Texas AG Says Trump Would've 'Lost' State If It Hadn't Blocked Mail-in Ballots

You're Wnelcome...

 

Facts matter. Not only was that signature audit done by the very same people who are being accused of allowing the fraud to occur in the first place but furthermore the idea that they looked at 15,000 ballots and only had TWO people get fit these qualifications is completely preposterous:

Election workers may analyze the following aspects of a voter's handwriting in order to compare and verify signatures:

• Slant: Signatures from the same voter's hand should be slanted, or angled, in the same way. For example, if a voter's registration record signature includes letters that slant noticeably to the right, an election worker might look for the same slant in the voter's ballot return paperwork signature.
• Size and proportion of letters: When comparing signatures, an observer would expect the letters in each to be approximately the same size and share the same rough proportions to other letters. If, for example, one signature features a capital "A" that is noticeably larger than the capital "A" in the signature against which it is being compared, it might be determined that the two do not match.
• Shape of letters: Individual letters in signatures from the same voter's hand should share the same shape. For example, if the capital "A" in one signature is written in block letters and the "A" in another is written in traditional script, an election worker might determine that the two do not match.
• Ending strokes: Some signatures feature long ending strokes. If one signature features a long ending stroke and the other doesn't, they may not have come from the same hand.
• Speed of writing: A signature lacking fluidity, that appears halting, might suggest that the individual signing it was writing slowly in an attempt to replicate someone else's signature.
• Pen lifts: If someone is attempting to replicate someone else's signature, there might be observable pen lifts (i.e., marks indicating that the pen was lifted from the paper) in the forged signature.

 

And you want us to believe that out of 15,000 ballots only TWO had one of those problems?

You can feed that bullshit to somebody else.

Even if there were no fraud you would still expect more than 2 out of 15,000 based upon that criteria and the fact signatures change over time. The idea they only found two is COMPLETELY preposterous.

 

Reality matters. It's literally impossible to forge enough ballots to throw a national election without getting caught. Explained over and over. You keep trying that forged ballot angle though. You might convince a Trump voter.

 

Then you shouldn’t have a problem with as many signature verifications as we want to do. What’s the problem?

But no instead the democrats are fighting tooth and nail to stop them at every opportunity. Including suing them to stop checking.

 

We don't need a verification. Show me the duplicate ballots. Then you'll have something. How many ballots you think we're forged? 100,000? We should see at least 25,000 duplicate ballots submitted. Where are they?

 

Is there any doubt?

"Cheating," wasn't the point; that's the word Trump-Republicans loose upon Democrats, like candy from a pinata. The idea was that he was against doing anything that might encourage more people to vote; especially if they were the wrong people.

 

Such desperation.

 

Give us authorization to do signature verification and we will find out.

 

If duplicate ballots are received they're caught instantly. You got nothing.

 

And shockingly the democrats are doing the same thing NH they did with the audit in Arizona. They’re saying yeah you can do an audit, just don’t match signatures with voter records without our permission.

Now why the **** would they do that? Why is it okay to do an audit but not okay to match signatures? And I’ll remind you AGAIN, matching signatures is the ONLY way to authenticate a ballot.

 

Privacy. Value it.

 

Oh that’s interesting because they have access to the envelopes with ALL of the identifying information on it but they’re simply not allowed to match them to the voter registry.

Imma give you a mulligan cause you clearly didn’t think it through. You wanna try again?

 

Lol. Didn't think it through. Such projection.

Show me the duplicate ballots? Don't have any? Good. No signature fraud. Case closed.

 

Lies. There are a multitude of ways they could have produced the ballots.

For instance, without a signature verification audit, how do you know that the democrats didn’t simply introduce a ton of fraudulent mail in ballots (without a matching envelope) during the count?

The ballots have already been separated from the envelopes and placed into batches. A democrat operative walks in with 10 boxes of ballots that the democrats simply reproduced somewhere and put the votes on it.

Without a signature verification recount, exactly how do you know that didn’t happen? Because if you just do a recount, those ballots look legitimate and there ARE NO DUPLICATES.

That’s just one way they could cheat. There are a plethora of others if you don’t authenticate the signatures and match the number of envelopes to the number of mail in ballots.

 

Which part of "illegal" are you not agreeing with?

 

Which btw would explain the statistically anomalous spikes in the vote count.

 

Weren't you (plural) been making fun of Trump, doing the same?

You (plural) were.

 

That's why Democrats are not complaining about Utah. No matter what cheating, Republicans will win Utah.

 

Talk about not thinking things through.

Lemme help. If your Amazon order never shows up, do you just forget about it?

 

What are you talking about?

 

Lol. Think it through.

 

Ah, so you are not upset by the metrics instead you are upset more people were not robbed of their vote.
Interesting

 

Conservatives have a long history of denying fundamental rights to people since the founding of this nation. From black freedom to women votes to civil rights to gay marriage to LGBT rights. American Conservatism is such a sad and failed ideology.

 

No my point is that IF the signature verification was done properly using those principles we would have expected to see many more flagged for those issues described above than two.

Which MEANS they didn’t do the signature verification process or they didn’t do it correctly.