The 9/11 Attacks: Pardon Me But This Is Just Absolute Comedy!

the government has already been proven beyond a shadow of unreasonable doubt to be complicit, the real question is why would OSHuggers watch a murder then fence and side with the murderers.

 

The reason that rational men accept the official narrative is that it is not written by obvious Nazis and lunatics like Da Twoof.

 

You're making an assertion, nothing more. There is NO evidence the gov "was in on it".

 

Geeze,shouldn't a 'lawyer' know that it's a shadow of a 'reasonable' doubt,not unreasonable?

 

Shhhhh your in a different reality than some. They usually readjust the tinfoil upon awakening but let em rest for now.

 

there are mountains of evidence

its posted here all the time

what are you talking about?

be specific

 

you're back???

lol!!

 

No, no there isn't. What you post are assertions, nothing more. You assert all the photos and videos are fake based on misunderstanding of video compression, poor quality images or stuff that's not even in the photos. You dishonestly fail to address how all those photos were gathered and altered to have the plane added in correct context of the photos location, angle, quality....and then uploaded to the net within a few days....ALL WITHOUT THE PEOPLE WHO TOOK THOSE VIDEOS AND PHOTOS, COMPLAINING!!!

You assert the claims of those in and around NYC who eyewitnessed the crash are somehow false unless they are "certified"?...what the (*)(*)(*)(*) does the even mean?

You assert the "nose-in, nose-out" hypothesis from A$$ Baker is proof of CGI when its not. You dishonestly fail to show the rest of the video which clearly show the "nose" shape losing its form as it moves away from the building. Why, because it's debris!...not the nose of the a CGI plane. If it were CGI, it would not have not lost it's shape.

...and that's just for starters. Your BULSH is old and tired...as are your claims of being an Attorney.

 

Do bring some next time. None of what you have posted is evidence.

 

It is evidence of something, but not what Koko thinks.

 

you assert there has been some kind of a misunderstanding when you had ample opportunity to point out the differences and failed to do so?

I am sure fang would really appreciate your going in and bailing him out.

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=335441&page=22

feel free to clear it all up for us.

well you see its impossible to "dishonestly fail to address how all those photos were gathered and altered" since its just another irrelevant red herring and I never addressed it. LMAO No need to lecture me about "honesty" cough.

Which people? which videos? Got a list?

"nose-in, nose-out" is not a hypothesis anyone with functional eyes can see it.



a rock is debris too but its still a rock. LOL

 

a rock is a solid, highly dense mass.

the nose of an airplane is not.

 

It is a comedy of errors.