The 9/11 Attacks: Pardon Me But This Is Just Absolute Comedy!

Discussion in '9/11' started by Quantumhead, Dec 18, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the government has already been proven beyond a shadow of unreasonable doubt to be complicit, the real question is why would OSHuggers watch a murder then fence and side with the murderers.
     
  2. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The reason that rational men accept the official narrative is that it is not written by obvious Nazis and lunatics like Da Twoof.
     
  3. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You're making an assertion, nothing more. There is NO evidence the gov "was in on it".
     
  4. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Geeze,shouldn't a 'lawyer' know that it's a shadow of a 'reasonable' doubt,not unreasonable?
     
  5. EggKiller

    EggKiller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2012
    Messages:
    6,650
    Likes Received:
    483
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Shhhhh your in a different reality than some. They usually readjust the tinfoil upon awakening but let em rest for now.
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    there are mountains of evidence

    its posted here all the time

    what are you talking about?

    be specific
     
  7. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you're back???

    lol!!
     
  8. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, no there isn't. What you post are assertions, nothing more. You assert all the photos and videos are fake based on misunderstanding of video compression, poor quality images or stuff that's not even in the photos. You dishonestly fail to address how all those photos were gathered and altered to have the plane added in correct context of the photos location, angle, quality....and then uploaded to the net within a few days....ALL WITHOUT THE PEOPLE WHO TOOK THOSE VIDEOS AND PHOTOS, COMPLAINING!!!

    You assert the claims of those in and around NYC who eyewitnessed the crash are somehow false unless they are "certified"?...what the (*)(*)(*)(*) does the even mean?

    You assert the "nose-in, nose-out" hypothesis from A$$ Baker is proof of CGI when its not. You dishonestly fail to show the rest of the video which clearly show the "nose" shape losing its form as it moves away from the building. Why, because it's debris!...not the nose of the a CGI plane. If it were CGI, it would not have not lost it's shape.

    ...and that's just for starters. Your BULSH is old and tired...as are your claims of being an Attorney.
     
  9. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do bring some next time. None of what you have posted is evidence.
     
  10. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is evidence of something, but not what Koko thinks. :crazy:
     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you assert there has been some kind of a misunderstanding when you had ample opportunity to point out the differences and failed to do so?

    I am sure fang would really appreciate your going in and bailing him out.

    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=335441&page=22

    feel free to clear it all up for us.

    well you see its impossible to "dishonestly fail to address how all those photos were gathered and altered" since its just another irrelevant red herring and I never addressed it. LMAO No need to lecture me about "honesty" cough.

    Which people? which videos? Got a list?

    "nose-in, nose-out" is not a hypothesis anyone with functional eyes can see it.

    [​IMG]

    a rock is debris too but its still a rock. LOL
     
  12. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    a rock is a solid, highly dense mass.

    the nose of an airplane is not.
     
  13. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,828
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It is a comedy of errors.
     

Share This Page