The Batman movie massacre so obvious it is a false flag to take your guns away

How the hell does an unemployed (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) afford all this military equipment? the answer is simple, it was supplied! \

From another poster that is logical--

If you start to look at the really big picture here, the obvious question arises: How does an unemployed medical student afford all the complex weapons gear, bomb-making gear, "flammable" booby trap devices, ammunition, multiple magazines, bullet-proof vest, groin protection, ballistic helmet, SWAT uniform and all the rest of it?

A decent AR-15 rifle costs $1,000 or more all by itself. The shotgun and handgun might run another $800 total. Spare mags, sights, slings, and so on will run you at least another $1,000 across three firearms. The bullet-proof vest is easily another $800, and the cost of the bomb-making gear is anybody's guess. With all the specialty body gear, ammunition, booby-trap devices and more, I'm guessing this is at least $20,000 in weapons and tactical gear, much of which is very difficult for civilians to get in the first place.
__

Holmes was clearly provided with exotic gear

"He said pictures from inside the apartment are fairly disturbing and the devices look to be sophisticated, adding the booby-traps were 'something I've never seen.' One rifle, two handguns, a knife, a bullet proof vest, a ballistic helmet, a gas device, a gas mask, military SWAT clothing and unidentified explosives were also found in Holmes' car, a law enforcement source told CBS News. Oates said Holmes wore a gas mask, a ballistic helmet and vest as well as leg, groin and throat protectors during the shooting."

In other words, this guy was equipped with exotic gear by someone with connections to military equipment. SWAT clothing, explosives, complex booby-traps... c'mon, this isn't a "lone gunman." This is somebody who was selected for a mission, given equipment to carry it out, then somehow brainwashed into getting it done.

"Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes' apartment is booby-trapped with a 'sophisticated' maze of flammable devices. It could take hours or days for authorities to disarm it," reports Yahoo News (http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/suspect-neuroscience-phd-stu...).

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036536_James_Holmes_shooting_false_flag.html#ixzz21LyfeNlX

 

..In a false flag, wouldn't you want the perp to die, thus eliminating anyway he could provide evidence of said false flag? So why provide him with bullet proof vests and such? Also, the likelihood that anyway anti-gun legislation passes any chamber of congress (State or Federal) is 0 so it would all be for not anyway. In other words, no, you're wrong.

 

Why would that be needed when the Zionist own all the media and they just feed the sheep bollocks as news? Did anyone that did 9/11 need to die? obvioiusly not, as a matter of fact they perps made billions out of it. The patsy that is accused of doing the Port Arthur massacre to take Australians guns away is still alive but the Zio media call anyone names that questions anything about that.

Did anyone that orchestrated the USS Liberty false flag die apart from the victims?.....what's the difference with this?

 

But then there is the problem that nothing gun related with come us this anyway..

 

Yeh but they are trying to get the guns out of the citizens hands, which is the last line of defense from a tyrannical government. If you look at what happened in Australia when they disarmed the Australian people it was exactly the same, a false flag a massacre, when logic tells you that the more people that are armed in society the less of these crimes can happen. Look up Jeanne Assam who was employed by a church as an armed security guard and stopped one of these false flag massacres from happening because she shot the shooter dead on the spot when he came into the church about to start shooting. The Zio media have kept that really quiet about that haven't they?

 

"so obvious" is not an argument.

Even if an explanation fits all the facts, and makes perfect logical sense, this doesn't necessarily mean this thing is the actual truth of what happened.

There can be other explanations also which make logical sense and fit the facts. Rationalizing out an explanation that is "obvious" isn't actual proof. Actual proof should accompany accusations of this magnitude.

But this one doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

First of all, massacres like this happen all the time in the USA, ergo if they needed a shooting spree to serve as a "false flag" to take guns away, why couldn't they just have used any of the dozens of violent shooting sprees that have already happened?!?!? Or wait for the next one, which is usually just around the corner.

Also, how do you justify taking everyone's guns away using a case of a guy with automatic assault rifles and grenades and kevlar and all that or whatever you said his kit was.. Yeah we need to take away that little .38 you've got under your pillow, because Rambo here managed to shoot a load of people with 30,000 dollars worth of cutting edge military hardware.

Where'd he get the money?!?! Must have been the government supplying him? Maybe not. Maybe he just collected some dead relative's cash in an inheritance. Maybe he found a duffel bag in the woods. Maybe he took out a fraudulent loan. Maybe he robbed somebody. The guy's criminal enough to go shooting people but you didn't consider armed robbery as a means for him to get money!??

As far as firearms related false flags, it seems you're barking up the wrong tree. You've got a better chance barking up at the "fast and furious" tree.

 

It's obvious that violence in films has an effect on the mentally unstable.

_

 

What a load of nonsense.

Massacres like this don't happen all the time in the USA or anywhere else, you are making it sound like "let's go for a walk and witness a massacre", that is ridiculous. Killings happen daily but it is mainly gang related, some upset spouse, robbery, Goon cops killing people, etc. But when it happens like this which is rare it is made to look like no one is safe from the boogie man so the government (the mafia) has to protect us (from what they did) because no one is really scared of the gangs as they just kill each other and most of us are not in gangs, most of us are in happy relationships if not we just move on, most of us do not go on robbery sprees, so the government to take your guns away have to create a the impression that it doesn't matter where you are someone is gunna KILL YA, which if you look into it it, it is the Government doing it!

 

The United States has been gradually but consistently eroding away the rights of its people for a long time now. It's accelerated a bit in the last ten years.

I will not be surprised when they've taken away every single last right except for one. Do you know which right that is I'm referring to?

I won't be surprised if in ten or twenty years the United States makes North Korea look like Disney world.

The people won't revolt or rebel or anything when all the other rights get taken away.. They will all be walking around with microchip implants, driving through military checkpoints to report for labor duty, going home and saying the pledge of allegiance to the US flag in their living room in front of the CCTV camera and the black box voice recognition pledge of allegiance verification, swear word detecting, dissent alarm computer, then their TV will turn on automatically and display supreme leader's official news network, Uncle Sam TV, on the only TV station that is broadcast, before you report to the bedroom for labor force growing reproduction duties with your state-assigned surrogate female.

Nobody will revolt. People will live on.

Yet they go to take guns away?!??!

THEN it's revolution. MILLIONS of people will fight to the death and you'll have to pry the guns out of their dead hands.

Trying to take the guns it will require a war.

 

There was also 2 people involved. Ive heard 2 eyewitness accounts now. 1 has the shooter in a black trench coat and the other has him in camoflauge.

...also another mass murderer with connections to the neuro community. Just like ft hood, just like Teddy etc.

MKultra alive and well.


We live in sick times.

 

Conspiracy theory much.

After the Port Arthur massacre, Australians took to the streets to have gun ownership laws changed,, so horrific was the event. The Australian government listened and tightened up gun ownership. Democracy at work.

To add,, the Australian government did not take guns away from the people, it just made gun ownership more difficult to obtain.

 

His handler let him in and supplied him.

CNN
July 22, 2012

AURORA, CO — A man who was at the Colorado movie theater where a dozen people were killed this morning, says he saw the gunman.

[...]

“As I was sitting down to get my seat, I noticed that a person came up to the front row, the front right, sat down, and as credits were going, it looked like he got a phone call. He went out toward the emergency exit doorway, which I thought was unusual to take a phone call. And it seemed like he probably pried it open, or probably did not let it latch all the way. As soon as the movie started, somebody came in, all black, gas mask, armor, and threw a gas can into the audience, and it went off, and then there were gunshots that took place.”


There had to be two people because theres no way you risk leaving all of your guns outside of an exit unattended for an op like this. Too much risk for someone walking right up to them, and then you're foiled.

 

he wasn't unemployed

he was a student but also worked for that college from what I heard

 

Great post Ivor, the fact is in these false flag massacres there always is two or more people doing it. The Port Arthur massacee in Australia (the excuse they used to disarm Australians) there were witnesses silenced and called all the names under the sun by the Zionist owned media that said there was more than one gun man. The Norway massacre is another one that people said there was more than one gunman but the media buried that.

 

apparently it would not be unusual at all to have a car loaded like that in the USA as it was all perfectly legal

In fact I was hearing on CNN that there are many states in the lunatic US that allow people into restaurants with guns!!!!!

One minister was saying who is opposed to guns in the USA that there are no need now for guns to protect Americans according to their right.

That law was put in place to enable the invaders to kill and Indian opposition and then later to keep the black slaves under control.

Well thats what he said anyway but it doesnt sound surprising at all!

 

What if he bought used? Why couldn't he have purchased any of those weapons/armor at any pawn shop/gun show in the country? And who says he couldn't afford $20 thousand worth of weapons? And how do you jump from roughly $3,600 to $20,000 in the (*)(*)(*)(*)ing first place? Anyways this isn't even close to latest wold news it's bat(*)(*)(*)(*) crazy conspiratorial tripe, the only question is who you are going to blame in your paranoid delusions, is it the free-masons, the illuminati, or the Jews.

 

you mean you think it was like the underwear bomber, not real?

 

many of our business have signs saying no guns beyond this point

I do think every American should be allowed to own rifles and hand guns, but that is it


when someone invents a laser gun that can cut through a line of people like butter would that be an ok gun to have, no, it shoudl be illegal, we need to use common sense, people can own protection.. within limits

 

lol, yep how did I guess "It's zee JOOOOOOOSSSSS!!!!""" Oh and they apparently control the media too.

Um really don't think that Bin Laden and al-Qaeda (you know the people who actually perpetrated the 9-11 attacks according to those not suffering from acute idiocy) didn't make billions out of it and yes the hijackers did have to die. But congratulations, you managed to blame the Jews for shooting up a movie theater, accuse them of controlling the media, and relieve the Islamic Imperialists of their responsibility for the murder of 3,000 innocent American citizens, 0 to (*)(*)(*)(*)tarted in less than 3 posts!!!

The U.S.S. Liberty incident was not an example of a false flag it was an example of friendly fire as proven conclusively by the NSA transcripts of Israeli radio communications.

 

The media in Australia is NOT owned by Zionists ( where did you get this information? Links please).

Guns were not taken away from Australians but Australians demanded tighter gun control after the Port Arthur massacre. The government, after tightening gun control, offered a buy back scheme were gun owners could sell their firearms which were then destroyed. Many many gun owners took up this offer.

And for your information, guns aren't banned in Australia.

 

READ IT BEFORE THE FEDS MOVE IN AND TAKE IT ALL DOWN:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread859297/pg1-

 

: damm

 

Mario, massacres happen in the US all the time. Maybe not with this many in one place, but all the time.

The people of the US are not going to demand to have their guns taken away. Even if both parties in both houses of Congress passed such a law and the President signed it, they would have to pay a lot of people to take just mine and there are hundreds of millions of gun owners in the US. The US Government is not going to bankrupt itself just to take people's shotguns, pistols and rifles.

In the 90s, we had a ban on the production and sale of new assault weapons and limited ammo capacity, but they didn't take anybody's weapons: It would have cost too much money. Most of the politicians that voted for the ban eventually lost their jobs and later, the ban expired without a whimper.

You know so little about my country and just believe garbage that you read on kook sites on the internet. Think about this: Ammunition and Gun manufacturers have A HUGE gun lobby. These wealthy corporatists would never allow a gun ban and will most likely push the idea on gun nutter kook and conspiracy sites that if all those people had been armed with guns containing armor piercing ammo, that the only person to be massacred would have been the idiot with the assault rifle and helmet.

 

Read my previous post, Mario.

 

If anything comes of this, it might be a ban on the sale and manufacture of high capacity magazines like before, with those currently out there grandfathered in.