The Batman movie massacre so obvious it is a false flag to take your guns away

That may have worked in the latter part of the 18th century,, but today,,,,,,nah.

 

seems more important today than EVER before.

 

What is it with you JIDF clowns playing dumbos pretending that you don't know what is going on?

that comment was made by Netanyahu to Jonathan Pollard upon exiting Pollard's jail cell in 2002, Pollard the biggest traitor the US has ever had in history. Oh and by the way the self proclaimed chosen ones (nut cases) have already screwed the USA into a financial basket case, or are you still listening to CNN for advice?

 

Whenever some one starts to examine the details of some event like this one, and propose various hypothesis about what the various clues might mean, there are the war crazies right there to yell at them and call them names.

In discerning the truth of what really happened in a society that rigs all the news, being open for all the clues, no matter what they may indicate, is the first step in sorting them out.

Those who object to extensive examination of the facts available, do not want those facts known, let alone examined for what they may indicate.

The multitude of Talmudic objections to examining the facts in itself indicates that there is very likely much more to these events than our nice Noahide News media & officials tell us.

 

Yes I know. I said there will be blood sacrifice.Very first screening .I mentioned the U.N and .Lucifers agent's are comming for your guns. No coincidence this was planned. 13th Zodiac ATS poster.


Lucifer is coming. We are in the end game stage. Your world is about to be flipped upside down.

Atheism is about to vanish in the blink of an eye. Unfortunately they will chose the wrong side.

 

Hi Mandy, how ya doin?

No use replying to anything on this board, the mods have deleted so many posts on here that the thread has stopped making sense.

Anyway take care mate!

 

I think some mods get more offended than the posters that are being mildly insulted.

lol.

 

Yeah, I can't make heads or tails of this thread anymore. Anyway, Cascade is having a bit of a meltdown on the Cornfield. I'll have to pop over there for while and watch.

 

Yeah seems a bit silly to come on here when you are having a discussion with someone and somebody that isn't involved in the discussion kills the discussion. (where the hell did they come from?) Man it's like a nosy neighbor butting into your affairs.

 

This did not take long. I was talking to a friend the other day and we were talking about what happened. I said to him, "you just wait, some whackjob on the internet will try to make a conspiracy out of this". Happened faster than I expected. If this kid was a medical student he had the means to afford these weapons. How do you think he was able to afford to go to school? He was getting money somehow, either from his parents or student loans.

I do believe there are people in the government that would like to see all firearms off the street. However, they are a very small minority. No where near enough politicians support removing guns off the street to ever pass a bill to do so. There is also very few people who support such a thing. The minute the government tries passing a bill, you can bet those responsible would not survive another term and someone would be voted in to reverse those laws.

Either way, you conspiracy nuts need to find something more constructive to do with your time. Or at least keep your conspiracies locked up in your bunkers.

 

Dunno what planet you live on but here on earth University students get student loans from the government to pay their study, and as is well known now they end up paying those debts for most of their lives. Maybe before you start to lecture people me thinks you should first have some freakin iota of of reality!

 

Im not sure if you intended to argue against my point there, but somehow you managed to prove it actually.

 

So how was he supposed to afford 20k worth of military grade equipment if he was a med student probably hundreds of k in debt because of that? please reply when you make some sense!

 

That is how you get 20k of military grade equipment, is you go hundreds of k's in debt.

 

Um no they give you enough money for tuition and rent depending on how much debt you want to go into and they give it to you in cash, there are, also, lapel grants of upwards of $10,000 payed in $5,000 chunks again in cash, quite frankly you don't have a clue what you're talking about.

 

enough for tuition... so how much is that for a Med university placement Einstein? we are talking above the 100k plus all the extras you mentioned, however in your amnesiac state you forgot to mention that it has to be paid back to the Government hence the student is in debt for that amount. So again tell me how he was able to afford 20k in military grade equipment?

 

If I did say that little straw man quote then yes it would be ridiculous.. But the problem is you don't understand what "all the time" even means or how it's being used. "all the time" is not a specific indication of a specific frequency of occurrence for any and all types of event.

Rather, it is an informal, vernacular usage that's just meant to have a general meaning, that is relative to that action to which it refers.

This can mean either of two things, both of which apply. It can mean that something happens on a somewhat some kind of periodic basis, or it happens much more than it should or more times than you want or expect.

It's relative to the type of occurrence.. For example if I say, "I get fired all the time" this doesn't mean every single time I wake up on the first day of the job, just means I have a habit of it, or I'm upset with the number of times I did it.

Or even further back, people argue global warming, people say "climate change happens all the time" means it's a cycle and relative to the geology it does happen again and again. Anyone knows what that implies, you wouldn't go and say, "what so you're saying that tonight you go to bed and it's ninety degrees and tomorrow you wake up under a glacier'.. No it's relative to a geologic timescale.

And subjective. Different people mean different concepts of it. Not necessarily yours. It's an imprecise colloquial term, not anything literal. If I wanted to be literal I would state a specific frequency.

I wasn't trying to have a go about massacre rates; I was just saying that it's happened before on enough occasions that you don't need a "false flag" because you've got real occurrences to use as your springboard anyway. A point you missed when extracting just three words out of context. It's not even the point.

 

I think the gap between "all the time" and "hardly ever happens" is too great not to understand that it is dumbo to say "all the time" when you mean hardly ever.

Last time I ate a peperoni pizza was about 6 years ago, it would be stupid to say I eat one all the time when I can hardly remember last time I had one.

Your argument is (sorry mods if I offend you) STUPID!

 

If that guy paid 20k for the stuff he had... he was an idiot... easily get all that crap for under 5 k here is a list of ballpark costs of medium grade readily available stuff he very likely used all available at your local tactical gear shop
M-4 clone for 600 bucks
ballistic Leg armor 100
ballistic vest for 300
CQB optic(scope) 200.
gas masks 50$
Ballistic helmet 100
clothing 150 bucks
Magazines 100
Ammo 300
Pistol 350

By the way.. any of you interested in purchasing tactical gear had better hurry because guess what is about to demonized and regulated into oblivion.

 

I Googled "List of worst gun massacres in the US" and got the worst ones. There are many, many more, like the massacre of those Amish school girls, or the one in California yesterday, but they didn't make the list:

Today's shootings in Alabama are the latest in a catalogue of shooting sprees that have led to calls for a tightening of US gun laws.

December 2008


A gunman dressed as Santa Claus kills nine guests at a Christmas Eve party before taking his own life in Covina, a suburb of Los Angeles in California.

December 2007


A gunman kills eight people and wounds five at a shopping mall in Omaha, Nebraska, before killing himself.

April 2007


Cho Seung-hui kills 32 people and wounds many more at the Virginia Tech college in Blacksburg, Virginia, in two separate incidents on the same day. Cho had been diagnosed with a severe anxiety disorder.

March 2005


Jeff Weise, a student at Red Lake high school in Minnesota kills five students, a teacher, a security guard, and then himself. Before school, he had shot dead his grandfather and grandfather's companion.

April 1999


Two students at Columbine high school in Littleton, Colorado, kill 12 students and a teacher before killing themselves.

October 1991


George Hennard drives his pickup truck to Luby's cafeteria in Killeen, Texas, then shoots dead 23 people before killing himself.



August 1986


A former employee enters a post office in Oklahoma and shoots dead 14 workers before killing himself.

July 1984


Twenty-one people are killed when a 41-year-old man opens fire at a McDonald's restaurant in San Diego. He is shot by police.

February 1983


Three men shoot dead 14 people in the Wah Mee club in Seattle's Chinatown.

August 1966


Charles Whitman, a former marine, holes up in the clock tower at the University of Texas campus in Austin, where he had studied. He kills 15 people and wounds another 32 before being shot dead by police.

 

First of all I'd like to nominate you for longest sentence of the thread award.

And I'll need to clarify some of your distortions:

1) The primary "bogeyman" being employed is the Arabs on the opposite side of the world, which is a grossly exaggerated and misrepresented threat to CONUS. Massacres happen; it's not some kind of government fear campaign, which you've still not shown evidence for.

2) The gangs don't "just kill each other". Innocents get murdered all the time by gangs. Stray bullets kill kids, old people, you name it, thanks to reckless spray and pray type driveby shootings, shooting into crowds that another guy's fleeing into, and such like that. Or killed from false ID as they don't exactly give you a trial to determine that you're a rival banger, they might just see someone on a certain street and that's a good enough indicator. Or because someone happens to close to a drugs operation or wrong place wrong time kind of thing. Or as part of a robbery or crime against an innocent victim. Or somebody is a threat to their enterprise. Or because someone said too much to the police when they got caught with their dime bag or witnessed a shooting or whatever. Or because they want to quit the gang (it used to be usually that's a beat up but they're moving on towards executions for deserters) Or because someone is wearing the wrong colors. etc. etc. etc. etc.

And it's okay mentioning you're not affiliated on the internet, but be careful not to say that too loud on certain blocks because that can also get you killed. Or if not killed, then you'll get the anti-Syria "opposition" foreign proxy militia treatment, that is a gun to your head saying take up arms and join our crew and if not then you get killed (family members potentially as well).

3) "no one is really scared of gangs" is probably your biggest whopper. Many people in affected areas are speaking out against the gangs, and "living in fear" is an extremely common theme.

4) You act like inter gang killing itself isn't bad or to be considered part of the problem. The FBI says there's about 1.4 million bangers in the US.. So this means 1.4 million justified kills? Not all these are killers. Not all of them have a choice either.

 

Synonymous question arises - how come "our free" media does not ask these questions

 

I don't mean hardly ever. In fact my post says exactly what I meant, and it was the opposite of hardly ever. All the time and hardly ever are two complete antonyms, both of which are subjective and relative to what it is.

Yes it would be stupid. That's an everyday occurrence. As I said it's relative to what kind of thing it is. Like when they say species evolve new traits all the time. They don't mean on a daily basis or anything like that.

And that's the difference you just pointed out. You can't even remember it. Do you think anyone still remembers Columbine, or the DC sniper etc.?

Why would the mods be offended when you're saying it about me?!?!?

Anyway since you didn't understand my explanation, try this:

all the time is an adverb clause, and like adjectives, their meaning is relative to that which they describe.

"Wow, look at that sumo wrestler! He's huge!" Would you agree with that as a valid statement, or would you say, "no he's not.. He's miniscule and tiny. The sun, now THAT is huge. That's like a trillion times as big!"

What if you got pulled over and the cop says, "I clocked you doing 70 mph in a 20 mph school zone on a school day while children are present. You were going WAY too fast." Would he be right, or would you say, "I wasn't going fast. I was going very slow. The flashes from your red and blue lights are flying at 186,000 miles per second! Why don't you pull them over?"

"all the time" simply means it's something that continues to occur. The trend of it continues without stopping.

Please answer...

Can "all the time" be used to mean "frequently"?

I tell you what.. Will you let me change from "all the time" to "periodically" or "from time to time"? Would that be better?

If you reply please answer those two.

 

Well, I followed the link and it was dated 2 weeks prior saying there would be a blood sacrifice, so ... that is creepy. I'll give you that.

 

What link? OP's link was dated July 20.