Yeah I did so did about a million or more others.. I suppose it was all mass hallucination...Only a social parasite propagates this kind of garbage...
a million huh? wow yeh I know the government mooches off of the public but hey everyone has come to accept it is as normal
I also saw it on TV. Not the same, from your perspective, probably, but there was nothing inately wrong with the video I saw.
SO you honestly believe no one watched it hit live? Seriously man, how old are you? !0? Lot's of people saw the plane hit,it's not news.. You want to peddle despair, fine, but calling everyone who saw it liars or wrong, isn't making you seem like a guy with any answers.. It makes look like a nut who wears a foil hat... Good luck getting loyal followers ALex Jones...
So your defense for calling me a lair is to deny doing it...Okay noted, you're most likely not all there...
what defense, there are several people who were looking up at the tower at the time the alleged plane hit and saw nothing but (*)(*)(*)(*) coming out of and NO plane. Besides with all the chaos and PSTD there is no way we can depend on your version anyway.
Nobody standing where that photo was taken could possibly have seen the plane. There was a huge building blocking the way and probably baffling the sound for some time prior to impact. At that distance from the ground, the noise would not even have arrived at the street level before the fireball was fully-evolved.
My version? You are the one peddling a "version" here. I watched it happen on CNN the plane hit, you are claiming it wasn't a plane or some batch of nonsense. I am afraid YOUR VERSION is the unreliable one here.. Did you watch the catastrophe live? Did you see it?
He was not looking at the empty sky where the plane came from. He was looking at the flaming disaster in the north tower. He would not have heard the plane coming in that low before it hit the other tower.
you know I am going to have to start saving all these wacked out bul(*)(*)(*)(*) theories you people make. unreal nice to know that 767 can travel faster than sound DUH!
the problem with troughers is they keep trying to sell their fantasies, anyone can see that was blown from the inside out, when fuel tanks burst they look like this not a pyrotechnic demolition LOL
What in the hell is that and what has it to do with this topic? Could you at least once show an entire video of what you are nattering about? I can tell just from the background that we have some problems of scale here. I would also like to know where they would have stored enough fuel on the impacted floors, in occupied office space, to produce a mist of fuel that would have time to expand a bit before it deflagrated.
deflagration, it is what the alleged impact should have looked like not like this: or this now how a highly qualified fire chief could possibly miss that ball park by 10 universes beats the (*)(*)(*)(*) otta me,
This is absurd. There is no comparison between the two. ALL THREE parts of the Fire Triangle must be present in order for deflagration to occur. I see the words "Molotov cocktail" in the URL, which tells me that all three are present, because you have an actively burning wick when the fuel is released and atomized. That was not the case in the WTC attack. <<<Mod Edit: Personal Attack Removed>>>
as you can see one is missing in the alleged impact, nothing like hanging from the troughers own rope.
You just agreed with my point. There was no source of ignition immediately available, so the fuel had a chance to spread begfore it ignited. When it did ignite, from somewhere inside near the entry hole, it progressed exactly as it should have, from the inside out. There is no sign of an explosive charge going off.
aside from those brite white flashes as the alleged plane went in. pretty big sparks, and to deny there are no ignition sparks when a plane collides with a building or the ground is frankly insane. not that it would change the real visuals that should have been seen if you were correct.
The fuel did not reach the hot spots in sufficient concentration to ignite until everything slowed down a bit. Not all crashes even catch fire at all. Everything in the MiG incident stayed above ground where it landed. I am not even sure that the MiG has foam-filled fuel cells like an airliner. Just rupturing a non-filled fuel tank can cause a spark inside it.
you still get a flame ball outside the building, if it were real. and you always get a spark or enough heat to get ignition upon impact. you keep ignoring the flats lol
not to a physicist, I explained it already and have even shown a presumed firefighter a picture however I cannot think for them too.
