The truth is the truth and the lie is a lie. If you can't figure out the difference then don't blame me. NIST lied in their official report. That is fraud. NIST lied and 3000 Americans died on 9/11. That is too funny to the liars. LOL. He hehehe... lol. Jackasses.
Truthers said that a B-52 crashed into the Empire State building. They LIED. Truthers said that there are no witnesses to any planes crashing into the WTC. They LIED.
Funny, whenever NIST or any other government agency lies, others seem to justify it, if not completely excuse it altogether. When that is pointed out though, it's never relevant. Yes, only the non governmental agencies must be 100% accurate in every single thing that they say, or it's a lie. Strange standard these people adhere to.
So where is a description of the damage done to the bottom of the falling of the south tower in impact with the stationary top due to Newton's 3rd Law? psik
That's pretty broad statement....and not true. Gulf of Tonkin, Weapons of Mass Destruction, Florida vote count, Voter Fraud....all lies.
Actually its completely relevant to your blanket statement/claim. You base your entire black/white outlook on the premise that those who disagree with you are gov shills...as you have stated many times. I have just pointed/proved you are incorrect on your claim. Will you be honest enough to admit it?
No, I base much of my outlook on he available facts, and I point out that shills are a known entity, whose 'services', when it comes to 9/11, are highly instituted quite regularly. 9/11 has nothing the other topics you tried to wander into.
I thought you of all people would have no trouble using the search feature. I can sure you it's here.
Me spend time searching for something YOU suggest! Ain't gonna happen. If you want a chance of an answer provide a link. I don't guarantee it if you do. psik
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZT4BXIpdIdo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0kUICwO93Q Let's see you provide evidence of comparable exertion. psik
I helped run a professional speculative fiction magazine for 18 months. I think that far out weighs your arse wipe effort for entertainment value
Comparable info on 9/11. But then dummies who claim the collapse could happen can't produce a physical model that does what they say. We are supposed to believe that the Tacoma Narrows Bridge could be modelled in 1940 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rB008RAluyg at 2:45. They didn't have electronic computers in 1940. But in TWELVE YEARS with great computers they can't make physical models and produce detailed computer models for which they provide complete data. psik
Good Lord, 'truthers' are so lazy. No wonder their 'movement' was so impotent. The thread was right at the top. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=334262&p=1063366016#post1063366016
You can waste Brother Jonathan's time. You aren't saying anything worth paying attention to. The words "conservation" and "momentum" didn't both show up on any page. psik
