The "Frog Boiling" Strategy of the "pro-life" movement...

Even if they dont, they still give a negative consequence.

Is there any evidence those laws work? Not asking if you agree with them, just asking for evidence.

 

so you are all for lying to get useless laws passed, but only if it adheres to what you want.

As far as I am aware there is no reliable evidence to show they do work.

 

How will they reduce abortion rates? Show PROOF.......sorry, I won't accept LIES.....

 

The highlighted comment above requires you to provide reliable evidence to support it .. please do so.

maybe there should be laws passed on firearms, after all "Just because its legal doesnt [sic] mean its wrong to pass laws to reduce it."

 

Thats not an arguement on why such laws would be wrongg.

 

I didn't say it was, it was merely showing how inane your argument is, hence the raised eyebrows emoticon at the end.

now perhaps you would care to address the other part of my comment

 

You CONVENIENTLY missed """Originally Posted by Fugazi View Post

The highlighted comment above requires you to provide reliable evidence to support it .. please do so."""



And :How will they reduce abortion rates? Show PROOF.......sorry, I won't accept LIES

 

Why are you trying to prove my arguement is inane if you werent trying to prove the laws would be wrong by saying that?

 

That doesn't make any sense.

Still waiting for you to answer those inconvenient things you avoid.

 

Honesty? The reason pro-lifers oppose abortion is plain to see. If the public could only see a video of what abortion actually is!
The visual facts don't need much embellishment.

It is choicers who are dishonest. All these myths they perpetuate—that women will be dropping dead in droves if they don't get abortion, that women need abortions because of rape, etc. The biggest deceit of course is that it's just a clump of cells or 'clot of tissue' with no soul.

There are a few feminist extremists bold enough to come out and state the truth though. They may be very misguided, but at least they have the facts straight and openly state their reasoning: The woman is simply much more important, and her life shouldn't be hindered by a pregnancy.

 

Why don't you address the actual discussion instead of flying off at a tangent like you usually do. It might help if you read the exchanges instead of just jumping in willy-nilly

 

You are correct: The woman is simply much more important, and her life shouldn't be hindered by a pregnancy if she doesn't want it to be.

And that is what bothers you the most. Quit pretending your only concern if for a fetus...

 

Why can't you EVER answer those INCONVENIENT questions? Don't you like things that are INCONVENIENT? Is it an issue of CONVENIENCE?

Why do you have a right to avoid INCONVENIENT things but feel no one else should?

 

What inconvenient things did i avoid?

 

I think you two may be projecting your pro-choice insecurities onto Sam. Think about what you wrote.

 

and that is just one of the many

- - - Updated - - -

I do think, do you .. obviously not.

I am very, very secure in my stance .. I don't need to make things up (unlike you) in order to justify my position.

so in essence the saying goes a little like .. pot ... kettle ... black.

 

I 'm trying to get Sam to think about how HE doesn't like INCONVENIENT things but he thinks women shouldn't abort because of INCONVENIENCE.

I have NO insecurities about being Pro-Choice....it's the right thing to be.

Those who can't answer those INCONVENIENT questions are insecure.

 

I havent read a specific study regarding certain TRAP laws, but I assume they would have some effect.

 

And again, another INCONVENIENT question: WHY should TRAP laws have an effect on a LEGAL activity?

 

why shouldnt they

 

Thank you for admitting, in your own way, that you have NO answer to my question. ...

 

Good gosh.....this young man cares nothing about truth OR reality.

I am absolutely positive....he has been raised on Fox News, Rightwing Radio, Drudge Report, etc.

 

Im actually a fan of TYT, which is a liberal news show. I watch that more than I watch Rightwing Radio.