The Homophobic Double Standard

I don't think you understand what I said.

 

I strongly doubt these "same people" comparisons that come up every so often.

As I remember, Tebow is a football player who has fans upset with his flamboyant attempts to connect religion and his success at professional sports. How that could turn into an actual issue is way beyond me. Both sides are about as silly as possible. And, it is amazing to me that there are people in America who think the reaction to Tebow is actually a reaction to God.

Jenner, on the other hand, is at least a case in point on issues that aren't well understood and are showing up in schools, courts, etc.

 

If that's the best retort you have, then trying to have an adult debate with you is pointless. Here's how I conveyed my points to Perriquine

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=411112&p=1065087804#post1065087804

- - - Updated - - -

translation: Perriquine was faced with some logical conclusions that belie his beliefs and social stances, so he cops out with this weak bluff. Here's what he can't deal with: http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=411112&p=1065087804#post1065087804

 

It's more than you can handle, obviously. If someone like you is to be educated, the first thing he needs to understand is that he has nothing to teach; and you're not there yet.

 

Not a bluff. In fact, I'll call yours: Learn to properly quote, then repost with proper quoting the failed post in question - if you really think you want a responsive answer from me. Until then, I can't be bothered.

 

So it's twice now that you "can't be bothered". Either you're just blowing smoke or don't fully comprehend what you're doing. Bottom line: it's no Herculean effort to click the little arrow in a quote to go back to the original post to verify/review something. You're pissed because I merely insert my answers into a post in addition to a bottom line response. Since I color code, it's not rocket science to differentiate who is saying what.

But this is just a lame ploy by you to avoid an honest discussion as to my points...for essentially you cannot refute or disprove what I state beyond your personal opinion. So you just blow smoke without any real discussion. Pathetic on your part, but not unexpected. So unless your willing to engage in some intellectual honesty in this discussion, I'd say we're done here, and I won't bother responding to your expected insults, accusations or general BS...as the chronology of the posts will be your undoing. Carry on.

 

My, but you do blow a LOT of smoke without any actual discussion of the subject matter or what others have stated. For those interested in what actually transpired: http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=411112&p=1065089978#post1065089978

As for yguy, seems he has little more than the gain saying of anything I posting here. No point in wasting further discussion on him.

 

Not the issue. when you engage in the practice described above, your in-line comments don't show up when the post is quoted to make a response. Only the "bottom line response" shows up. It makes no sense to say you want a response, and then engage in a practice that ensures the thing you want me to respond to won't show up automatically in the quoted post, so that I have to go looking for it (not easy for someone visually impaired, by the way), copy & paste it, copy and paste the code to properly quote it with a link back to the post, etc. Someone else trying to follow the discussion will have difficulty figuring out what I'm responding to as well, since the thing I'm responding to won't be quoted immediately above my response in that same post, unless I do the aforementioned copying and pasting. What you're doing is non-standard and doesn't follow forum etiquette.

But enough. We're done.

 

see folks, he's got nothing but to whine that it's too hard to click the little arrow in the upper left hand of a post next to someone's name if he can't see the entire post. Here, for the intellectually honest reader: http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=411112&p=1065087804#post1065087804

I detest intellectually dishonest people who use excuses to avoid conceding a point they don't like. So I say goodbye to Perriquine.