The Left Is the Culture War Aggressor

What does a dispute over judicial philosophy have to with this? But if you want to go down that road, how about the left's smearing of Clarence Thomas and Bret Kavanaugh? Pretty tolerant, huh?

 

Leftists hate the truth.

 

What truth.

 

Anti-grooming laws shouldn't be necessary, but, you illustrate why they are.

Hard to understand what is wrong with some folks. Thank goodness parents and elected Legislatures are finally stepping up.

I just read that parents swept the School Board Elections in WI last week. Good news.

https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2022/04/creepy-joe-biden-groomer-in-chief.html#more

If the parents say no, and
The Legislature says no.
Who the hell are you guys to say yes, by what authority to you claim to be able to countermand the Parents and the Legislature?

 

The truth that conservatives are more tolerant than liberals.

 

The mere knowledge that gay, bi, and trans people exist will not cause anyone to "become" gay, bi, or trans. However, tops on gender identity is very much NOT appropriate for 4-7 year-old children. They are incapable of understanding it, and they don't have any need to understand it. Most ESPECIALLY when it comes to pre-planned lessons.

That said, parents (not teachers!) need to be very cautious if their children say something that might sound like transgenderism. When I was 8, for a period of time that lasted about 2 weeks, I wanted to be a lawyer. I am not a lawyer. So just because a youngster might say something like, "Mommy, I'm a boy but want to be a girl" at those very young ages should not be in any way presumed to be real. Kids think and say things that are quite off the wall at times.

However, if they start saying something along those lines at a tender age, and continue to feel and think that through puberty and beyond, then it may need to be taken more seriously. At no point prior to adulthood should any permeant body changes be allowed, ever, and hormone treatment should only be taken under advisement, ultimately a decision made by parents with the advice of medical professionals and anyone else they may wish to consult with. But even that isn't appropriate until well after puberty.

 

Fake New. Biden blocked a Black Woman from the supreme court.

Why did Biden block her? Was it because she is black, educated and has a different judicial philosophy?

 

It’s time to Hold the Line and no longer go to Disney parks or buy their products or subscribe to their channel.

 

I don't know of any doctors who are performing "bottom surgery" on prepubescent kids, aside from "corrective" surgery on hermaphroditic infants and infants with ambiguous genitalia. As for hormone therapy, I agree that should be up to the parents as informed by medical advisement. As for whether that is appropriate before puberty, I also leave that up to the medical professionals, so that sounds like the only thing we disagree on.

But if you are going to say that no permanent body changes should be allowed prior to adulthood (I'm assuming you are only talking about genital surgery here, of course), then you'd also have to outlaw the corrective surgery for hermaphroditic infants/infants with ambiguous genitalia and circumcision.

 

Nothing fake about that XX. All three judges showed their own record on the same issue and was never called. It shows that the RW do not really care about child pornography. If they did, truly did, then none of those three should have been confirmed, right?

Yes, Joe Biden blocked through filaburstering a judicial nomination, but it was not because she was black though or political idealogy, was it? It was the end of the 108th term under GWB. GBW renominated her in early 109th term and then she was confirmed. The rules of the Senate that was used was that there was not enough consideration at the time. That is why Justice Brown was eventually confirmed, just not at the end of 2003.

You are comparing apples and oranges here XX.

 

Your choice whether to go or not go, but it won't make a bit of difference much the same way as boycotts did with the "Last Temptation of Christ."

 

Um, that's not true.

 

So you admit that your claims of racism are just more of your nasty slander. That's fine, just remember this the next time you graditiously pick a fight with your interlocutor and you won't end up with egg on your face again.

Jen Psaki, Groomers’ Spokeswoman.

“Groomers? Oh hell yeah. I don’t care how loud they howl, this is purely evil, and ordinary people have got to wake up to what schools, the Walt Disney Company, the medical profession, the media," elements within "the Democrat Party, and the President of the United States are doing to children and families.’”

It's not enough to just not join in their grooming, you need to be an anti-groomer.

Groomer Witch Jen Psaki: Yeah, we're coming after your kids, and we'll roll over you bigots if you try to stop us.​

Yeah, **** You. Try it. We'll have your groomer ass hauled into court so fast you won't know what hit you.

This Groomer Witch speaks for the highest Democrat in the land. They are coming for the children with scalpels, with pharmaceuticals that will destroy the lives of these children and they mean to do it by force over the objections of the parents and the objections of the The People's Elected Legislatures and Representatives. And this Groomer Witch claims this authoritarian maiming of children is 'authorized' by Federal Law and the Constitution. This dumb Groomer Witch didn't cite the federal reg nor the portion of the constitution that she claims authorizes this mad attack, by some Democrats on Parents and States.

Do the folks supporting this craziness ever step back and in a moment of clarity say themselves, "We sound like raving lunatics?"

From mad elements within the Left we have a total assault on parents and children:

https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1512510290843168768?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1512510290843168768|twgr^|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/jen-psaki-groomers-spokeswoman-transgender-children/

​

 

Did not admit anything. I gave you more information and context about the original no cloture vote than you did. Evenutally, she was confirmed by the Senate, gave a hearing, and all that. And not one argument was about race or political ideology. It was about timing, the end of the term.

Twitter is for anyone and everyone who thinks they can get their 15 seconds of fame. Nothing you posted proves a thing at all. To equate LGBTQ and transgender people with child pornography or "grooming" is really a stretch, even for you.

 

Actually I was replying to your accusations of racism reposted below, for your convenience, as you now seem conveniently completely unaware of your own posts.

You are welcome to your views, but the Goomers can stay away from the School Children when the State Legislatures, working with the parents, have passed anti-grooming laws to protect school children.

 

That wasn't accusations of racism. That was accusations of linient sentencing for people convicted of child pornography in their federal court before being appointment to a higher court under GOP support. I was asking why the all of a sudden change of heart when you had three white judges doing the same thing as Justice Jackson. The Do as I say and not as I do argument that the GOP is well known for.

 

Yes it was. Properly rebuked, now you're backpedaling, I graciously accept your surrender.

Yes, Some Democrats Really Do Want to Groom Your Children.

Thank goodness some State Legislatures are teaming with parents to stop this exploitation of children.

Hell no!

Quite a war of aggression some of the Left has launched on parents and children. Groomer Witch Psaki, who speaks for the highest Democrat office holder is threatening taking your children from you so they can irreversibly mutilate their genitals and destroy their health with dangerous, irreversible puberty blocking drugs. These folks are even sicker than we realized.

 

Then you were not paying attention to all the GOP arguments that Justice Jackson was "soft on crime." Again, nothing was rebuked here.

What I was attempting to do was the socratic method or arguments. By laying out the basic facts, that three republican judges did the same thing as Justice Jackson did, then why the GOP opposed her in the first place when they did not oppose the same thing in the past? Was it because she was black, educated, and have a different judicial philosophy? This question is for you to answer why the change and you still have not answered that question. You danced around it yes, but never actually answered it.

Your so called answer was another judge at the end of the 108th Congress in which the Senate believed was not enough time to vet and thus no cloture vote was granted. Bush understood then, renominated her at the early 109th Congress in which she received more than 60 votes, the old rules BTW. So, your response was not even close to what my argument was making.

So, try again here Zorro.

 

I'm unaware of the 3 judges you say the Senate confirmed who were equally as soft on child exploitation, but, if what you say is true, they shouldn't have been confirmed either.

 

So basically, the REAL problems in America like health care and the national debt are difficult - so politicians and talking heads fight about
gay rights and cartoons .... whatever. Just a bunch of silly-assed crap for keeping the circus attendees entertained. Real Americans rise
above this petty crap.

 

DISPATCHES FROM THE EDUCATION APOCALYPSE: Why some the left really wants to sexualize your kids.

Start when they are younger.

CRT is the set up punch. Fill the little children with guilt and then offer them redemption if the little girls with get their breasts cut off and the little boys will get their dicks removed.

Well, parents and State Legislatures are the solution, stay focused on that.

 

Your post is the prefect example of bombastic hyperbole. Congratulations.

 

Pretty much! If only the Democrat voters would follow their gut and REALLY look back at history and the DNC they continue to vote for.. I mean, even if history is to hard, they should at least be able to see current events ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

I take the genital mutilation of children very seriously.

Biden: 8-Year-Olds Can Decide They’re Transgender.

​

“Joe Biden tonight said 7 and 8 year olds should be given the authority to be ‘transgender,’ despite data proving that the vast majority of kids with gender confusion outgrow it by puberty. We’re talking life-altering, body-harming decisions made by 1st graders.”

“Here’s the science: 90% of kids who suffer from gender dysphoria outgrow it by the time they’re adults if they do NOT transition. Puberty blocking drugs are NOT FDA approved for children or for gender dysphoria. Yet, Joe Biden wants to let 8yos decide if they’re transgender.”

https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-8-year-olds-can-decide-theyre-transgender

Why are some Groomers in Schools and extremists on the Left pushing these drugs on young children, and concealing it from parents when the FDA has not approved these drugs for children or gender dysphoria, and 90% of these children will outgrow this by adulthood if we simply do nothing but let them normally progress to adolescence?

Psychologist Debra Soh:

Indeed.

National Review noted in January 2019:

Yes, we take this: “the consequences of this gender affirmative therapy (GAT) are not trivial and include potential sterility, sexual dysfunction, thromboembolic and cardiovascular disease, and malignancy” very seriously.

They are children. Leave them alone.

 

Republicans have been dodging health care and the National debt for every bit as long as the Democrats - claiming anything else is
pure bullcrap.