That's incredibly ignorant. You're turd polishing for a truly defective character and it's making you sloppy. Character and temperament are essential if your job is to be the leader of a country.
That's wrong. Bush was amply warned that his pretext for Iraq was flimsy, but he was hell-bent on avenging his dad. The rest is history.
Why in the world would you give someone like Bob Woodward any sort of credibility in believing an "anonymous" source he is using? Quick fact: if it had been a Democratic Party presidential administration that attempted a break-in into the Republican Party headquarters at the Watergate Hotel, Ben Bradlee would have told Woodward and Bernstein to simply ignore their source and move on to another story. How do we know this? We saw it occur time and time again in the Washington Post, New York Times and other left-leaning news organizations during the Obama administration. Anyone paying attention is well aware of this, which is why these "journalists" lost their credibility with normal Americans years ago. Woodward might have a source within the Trump White House. He might have embellished what this source said, if he did, indeed, actually have one. Or he is simply repeating gossip he read online. Or he might be making stuff up. And a New York Times editorial? It is no better than Tass was in promoting party propaganda. I am not a Trump guy, by any means. But the mainstream media has lost any credibility they might have had based on their unhinged attempts to advance the liberal/progressive/socialist agenda they wholeheartedly have embraced...
This has nothing to do with Bob Woodward. And the NYT is fully aware of who the writer of the op-ed piece is. The NYT didn't write this piece, the high level Trump official wrote it - which is why the White House is busy trying to find this individual. I do believe the administration will find out who this is, and if they have any smarts at all, it shouldn't take very long.
Sorry, but there is no dispute about the nature of Russia's meddling. This, as opposed to quite a bit of dissent inside the intel agencies about WMD's, not to mention the work of the UN inspectors who consistently reported a lack of evidence of an active WMD program. Unfortunately, the links to most of the articles list here....... The Reporting Team That Got Iraq Right https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/17/the-reporting-team-that-g_n_91981.html ...........are no longer active. I read all of them when they were and they make the case that the narrative of consensus among the intel agencies is a myth.
I don't understand your issue here, even Trump has admitted they meddled so what is the problem again?
Yep; Woodward's book is along the same lines as the NYT editorial, right? Which, more than likely, was written by the second cousin of the nanny who watches a Trump administration's senior executive's kids. With help from the NYT editorial staff, of course. That paper is well invested in the 'resistance,' which is why it lacks credibility amongst most normal Americans. The bias of the NYT is overwhelmingly obvious, and its propaganda so plain to see, that only the most fervent of Team Blue actually believes what they read...
I saw this coming before the election.. How has he banboozled so many Americans.. or are they just stuck with their mistake and too stubborn to own it?
It's very telling that some do NOT think character and temperament are important....but they support someone who has no character and the temperament of a spoiled 2 year old so what do they know
Face the fact that the New York Times and other Democratic Party mouthpieces are abhorrently biased? That the Democratic Party operatives posing as journalists for these 'news' organizations are Goebbels-like in supporting the liberal/progressive/socialist agenda? It could have been Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio or Jeb Bush in the White House instead of Trump and we'd be seeing the same blatant behavior on the part of 'journalists.' Normal Americans have finally been able to circumvent the leftist propaganda coming from these clowns, which is why leftists are so intent on gaining control of social media. But it's too late...
What's to face? The left has found themselves another band wagon to coalesce around now that team Mueller seems unable to get the job done.
Lol...I think you miss the point. It's not another bandwagon, it's just one more nail in the coffin for trump. Every day, he proves yet again that he is temperamentally unfit to lead our country, and apparently even his own staff agrees. Why would you doubt trump's own team? Aren't they the very best people?
It's not that normal Americans doubt Trump's own team; rather, it's a deep, compelling mistrust of the Democratic Party operatives who pose as reporters for the New York Times and other "News" outlets. Virtually everything the New York Times touches is suspect: "But President Trump should relax and remember it is the New York Times after all. The paper has a scandalous history of lying about the seniority of officials it quotes anonymously - especially when that source parrots their agenda." https://townhall.com/columnists/phe...ing-seniority-of-anonymous-officials-n2516340 The leftists who staff the New York Times are so deeply invested in undoing the 2016 presidential election – overturning the will of normal American voters – that they could care less about the consequences of their actions. Liberals/progressives/socialists, if they obtain a majority in the House, will attempt to impeach Trump, And unfortunately for the leftists, the right will begin to follow the new rules established by the left. The casual violence that the Black Lives Matter communist, AntiFa, the clowns wearing ***** hats, Media Matters, the cop haters and other assorted thugs has been closely followed by normal Americans. Hillary and her minions were caught dirty when the corrupt Democratic Party failed to get her elected; now they are scrambling to become even more leftist than the extremists who seem to be calling the shots (in the case of the Bernie Bro shooting Republican congressmen, literally) about the new direction today's Democrats will take. This is why we need the First and Second Amendment; whenever leftists are able to disarm the population, death and destruction will follow...
They do not respect the votes of Americans. They do not respect elections. They do not respect free speech. They do not respect the 2nd amendment. They are totalitarians. Things end up badly for totalitarians.
The Soviets failed, proving once again Marxism sucks, so now Democrats hate Russia and want to kill them.
We are beginning to see a deterioration with his base. I am not sure if it was his performances with Putin and Un or his increasingly out of control tweets, but they seem to be tiring of him.
Remember- You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time. Abraham Lincoln Sadly, some will never be able to see their great orange hope for what he really is. The rest of us will have to be patient with them when it's over. There should be no gloating or dancing in the streets. We really do need to get along more, as poor Rodney King said after they beat the **** out of him.