"...The Next Messiah." - Bawbwa Wawa on Obama

Silence is acquiescence and I take yours as a white flag.

 

I forgot that Evan Thomas bit. Thanks.

 

False. Prove it. Rule 10. Chop chop.

 

H.J.Res. 114 (107th): Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution ... (On the Joint Resolution)

Here ya go, both John Kerry and Hillary Clinton voted for the use of force in Iraq. Both of em.....

Told ya so... See, theyre just as evil as Bush.... Im sure leftys will be calling em "little hitlers" in no time...

[video=youtube;9-axJTzj0VU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-axJTzj0VU[/video]

 

That is not a vote to go to war as you falsely claimed. That is a vote to give the Bush administration the authority to use force if he decides it is necessary.

Where's you're proof that "Hillary Clinton and John Kerry both voted for war in Iraq, multiple times" Rule 10. Chop chop.

 

Really?? So you dont believe my link?

It says right on it, authorization for the use of force against Iraq, and you still dont believe it?

Heres the other one...

Iraq Resolution

Please provide and apology. thanks

 

Heres video of hillary supporting her vote...

[video=youtube;ZSu0zXCR9sE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSu0zXCR9sE[/video]

 

The biggest Pinocchios of 2013

John Kerry owns the number 7 biggest lie of 2013, obama has 3 of his lies on the same list....

“I opposed the invasion of Iraq”



At least twice in 2013, Secretary of State John F. Kerry claimed that he opposed the invasion of Iraq. But not only did he vote in favor of a congressional authorization for war, but there is a rich paper trail documenting his repeated support for the attack after President George W. Bush launched it in 2003. As Kerry put it on May 3, 2003: “I think it was the right decision to disarm Saddam Hussein, and when the president made the decision, I supported him, and I support the fact that we did disarm him.” This is another example of after-the-fact historical revisionism.




.

 

Walters is old senile and feeble minded. only camera she should be in front of is the registration desk at the nursing home

[video=youtube;Z4VdVA_JGI8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4VdVA_JGI8[/video]

sorry. didn't mean to stay on topic

 

Your link in no way proves your claim that "Hillary Clinton and John Kerry both voted for war in Iraq, multiple times"

You once again completely failed to prove your factual assertion.

Please provide and apology. thanks

 

Tell us, in your expert military opinion, how long does it take to mobilize units in Greece, get the air transport units landed there and loaded, fly to Benghazi, disembark at the airport, and then get transportation to the US consulate.

In providing your expert opinion, please describe where and what troops are avaialable in Greece for deployment, their state of readiness and time required to mobilize, the air transport vehicles that are available in Greece, what is necessary to get them deployed and how long it would take, how long it would take to get to Libya, and how the units would be transported to the consulate in Benghazi.

And after you've documented your expert opinion, we can see whether they would have made a difference in firefight at the consulate.

Unit then all you've demonstrated is your ignorance on the subject as armchair Monday morning quarterback criticizing and contradicting US military command solely based on your obvious political bias. But maybe you can prove I'm wrong.

- - - Updated - - -

LOL who made that rule? But I'll keep it in my back pocket for your future posts.

 

There's also a 'Biggest Blowhard Ever' list and Kerry has 6 of the top ten spots.

 

Im not surprised in the least....

- - - Updated - - -

Youre full of crap.

I provided 2 links from 2 different votes, both show exactly what I claimed.

Hillary Clinton and John Kerry both voted to go to war in Iraq.

 

There will be a few good cobbled up commercials where Hitlary was for it before she was against it.

Bonus question: When was the last time Hitlary had something in her mouth as hard to swallow as her Benghazi lie?

.

 

I undoubtedly already have. You yourself verified that anti terrorist response teams were sent on stand by to Tripoli and somewhere in Italy (Sigonella, most likely).

You are trying your best to make it seem absurd that help could have been sent to Benghazi in time to make a difference (even though the fighting there lasted for hour after hour) yet help was already assembled and waiting to be called on....and that never happened.

Gregory Hicks already testified on this (I linked it) though you prefer to act as though he never did. Now it's time for you to display your intimate command facts and knowledge and explain why the second in command in Benghazi was wrong, but you are right!
I enjoy comedy so go ahead and show Hicks up.

It's called giving up.

 

Thats kinda the left handed plan, supplant god with the government...

and Obama is the Messiah of the left handed progressive communist democrats....

 

Utter bull(*)(*)(*)(*). That is absolutely untrue and I prove your claim is false. The joint authorization is not a vote to go to war. Rush and Sean and your internet videos have mislead you once again.

- - - Updated - - -

Depends on whether she follows Fox news.

 

Fail. You yourself have demonstrated you have no clue as to what you are talking about and this is just another round of baseless partisan hackery.

Fail.

 

Nope, Its true. Hillary Clinton and John Kerry both voted to go to war in Iraq. Both of them gave bush the power.

Its a fact, youre going to have to find a way to deal with reality.....

Barack Obama
Hillary Clinton
John Kerry

Theyre all killers, theyre all guilty, and theyre worse than Bush, because they lie about their bloodlust.





.

 

LOL, classic conservative, calling Dems "killers" and "guilty" for their "bloodlust" for a mistaken war Bush started.

And no, there was no "vote for war" like Rush and Sean falsely tell you. Read your own link to the joint authorization, and then quote the text where it says they are voting to go to war against Iraq.

 

You mean the Iraq Resolution or the Iraq War Resolution (formally the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002)?

 

The joint Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002.

There was no vote to "go to war" in it, contrary to the claims of some deceived Rush listeners, who are now busily reading it for the first time to try to find where it says that they are voting "to go to war" against Iraq.

 

Nope, you are wrong. There was a vote to go to war against terrorists, and those who harbor them. and another vote to go to war in Iraq specifically.

Hillary Clinton voted for it, John Kerry voted for it. They lie about it now, but they voted for it. That vote is the reason why Obama beat Hillary for the democrat nomination....

Lets go to the "way way back" machine, and see the lies for exactly what they are....
Heres Obama opposing the Surge in Iraq.... Listen to what he says....
[video=youtube;ifuk5POMiTg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifuk5POMiTg[/video]

"We cannot impose a military solution on what has effectively become a civil war, and until we acknowledge that reality we can send 15,000 more troops, 20,000 more troops, 30,000 more troops. I dont know any expert on the region, or any military officer that Ive spoken too privately, that believes that is going to make a substantial difference on the situation on the ground."

Now considered what he has done as President.... The CIA and the Qatari's created the civil wars in Libya and Syria, supplied the terrorists with weapons, and when they started to fail, obama unloaded 212 tomahawk cruise missiles into libya....

Obama lied to everyone, to get elected, and once elected, he did everything he promised not too....

Interestingly enough, obama never got any congressional authority to supply weapons to terrorists, and then shoot cruise missiles in support of terrorists taking over libya. Then he tried to do it again in Syria.

Even Nancy Pelosi thought it was great idea to supply weapons to terrorists and invade foreign countries without congressional authority.....

Obama and his trusty league of liars are a disgrace to reality.

 

When you respond { virtually never " in kind " } you merely give yer entire mindset away.
Lock,stock & barrel. By always using Conservative icon { Rush & Sean et.al/ }
you overplay yer already overplayed hand.The fact that Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity
have more listerners and viewers than the ENTIRETY of liberals who occupy this once
land of milk and honey is a hardened fact.
You take ALL liberal talk radio PLUS PBS and NPR and CNN and MSNBC and
I doubt all those folk { touchy feely schnooks an haters } would ,add up to a half
of what Limbaugh and Hannity get on an average weekday.
So right there you lost the argument.Unless you feel Limbaugh and Hannity are losers
and that numbers mean literally nothing.
I guess that explains yer quandary.Yer Loop.The manifest reason you scour the
internet,frenzied in hope of finding aggressively PRO Government sites with charts and graphs
and yes ... Numbers.Plenty of numbers.
I just outed yer entire spiel. Yer incurably inconsistently driven like a Mad Hatter.

 

Bush made his case with General A$$ [Powell ] at the United Nations.Then Bush spend
more than 6 months preparing both the American People and Saddam with a 15-0
unanimous security council use of force vote.
Bush was running around 80% in favor of his Foreign Policy handling when he
launched his Iraqi Freedom call to arms.But first he got the needed Congressional
approval for his use of force.Bush even addressd the nation on national TV like he did with
Katrina a full 48 hrs. before the Hurrican hit.
Bush gave Saddam 48 hrs. on national TV to turn himself in or face the music.
In Contrast Obama used NATO and The UN to get his approval to Invade and strike
Libya and then have Gaddafi assassinated.Obama used Panetta to address concerns in
Congress over holding a vote.Panetta basically told Senator Sessions,that Congressional
approval was not needed with his new boss { Obama }.That the United Nations was
the binding authority.
That is why Obama tried to pull another fast one { same kind of deal } when he called
for forcing a head of state in Syria out by military strikes.It didn't pass muster,this time.