Nope. Neoconservativism was/is a movement that favored aggressive US foreign policy, particularly in Middle Eastern matters. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism Whether you consider it "evil" or not is a matter of opinion.
They're all retired or quietly displaced elsewhere.Thay had their time and place In the Sun.They were right to stand up for what this Country once stood for. Being the Lone Superpower.John Bolton is still actively making huge sense out of the sheer daffy Foreign blunders Obama and Hillary saw fit to allow. Never before has the Middle East been this precariously close to On the Verge. Thanks entirely to 2 Monumental Ego's { Obama and Hillary } with nary a dimes worth or real Foreign expertise between the two. Victoria Jackson was correct all along.
Oh he's definitely a "messiah"-figure, as in an Antichrist of some sort. Well, can't expect anything good out of mainstream anything. The gatekeepers who claim to be of truth are just as bad as the higher cheerleaders of the Carnival of Destruction. Let's all get together and watch the show! Popcorn, anyone? Gad bless America.
I suppose if one thinks our country stood for invading and occupying other nations based on "mistakes" you'd have a point.
W/o Iraqi Freedom there would still be a Brutal Dictactor and 2 Sadist Sons gripping the Iraqi landscape with hourly tales of terror and mayhem. Saddam would probably be on his 300th Palace.He had around 70 Palaces when he hit him { Shock & Awe }. Plus the grafting and manipulation of - Oil for Food - program.
There's always been governments we don't approve of. We didn't invade Iraq because Hussein was a "brutal dictator" though I agree the Bush administration tried to use that as a justification after no WMDs were found.