The Silent War Against The White Race.

Well done for totally missing the point.

Good job.

 

I understood Jonah to be speaking of Americans.

 

You have not managed ONE post on here that is not full of haughty arrogance and personal attacks.

And you are at it again today.

Apart from that, all else you have done is dodge the ONE question I did ask you, which you invited me to ask.

- - - Updated - - -

I don't know because he was babbling about Bible prophecy before. Kind of hard to understand when he starts throwing that in...

 

Here's a problem with your statement: Every nation, in of itself is segregated from another. Mexico and the U.S? A few hundred miles. Canada has some inter-high way connections, but it still probably takes a few hours. Every other nation is also separated by hours, sometimes a few, sometimes as long as a day.

Segregation, in of itself isn't "racism". In fact, http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/hbcu

There are several black colleges/universities, including "scholarships" on the merit and basis of RACE. How ironic.

The fundamental question, which hasn't been truly answered is how is it that these minorities could support themselves from a "racial" perspective, but why not the Caucasian-American?

If it's really because of a "get them back" mentality, that makes your side no different from the lynchers of that era.

 

There. I fixed that for you. If you don't notice what's different, I removed the comma before "by themselves." The sentence now reads more accurately. The bulk of the discrimination that most of these people face, they are creating on their own. It's all in their heads.

 

Dang, you're such a bundle of joy. Now you imagine we're out to do genocide on your silly tail, and hint at terrible retribution.

If the 'white race' were destroyed, it would be the destruction of an idea, and not one empty hair follicle on any skinhead's head would be harmed. You guys are the dreaming-of-ROHOWA haters. We're peace and love types.

Genocide? Like chill, man.....

 

You asked me two, as I recall; if I had Jewish ancestry and whether I condemned racism I think. I believe I answered both, but couldn't quite grasp the relevance of any religious belief to the discussion. I also do not recall an answer to my questioning you as to why you felt it necessary to include references to Judaism in a discussion of your absurd fantasy of the "genocide" of the white race

Oh, and while you're struggling for a coherent response, can you point me to where I attacked anyone, personally? Thanks for your help; I'd hate to have inadvertently insulted someone.

 

What the hell does being poor have to do with representing 33% of the total forcible rapes in this country?

 

You do know that genocide does not = all people murdered, right?

You do know there are various definitions.

Of course you do, because I posted them before.



- - - Updated - - -

I have been wondering that too. Indeed, I find that somewhat offensive to people that don't have much cash and who are good people.

 

I can't recall seeing your answer, I may have missed it. It is a long thread and I try to read most of what I can.

I asked you in advance if I could determine whether you had Jewish ancestory or not.

You said yes. So I asked. Not religious belief. Ancestory.

As to PA's, come on man, I am not going to do a full audit of them, but anyone reading your posts can see that most are just lashing out, and attacking anyone that does not agree with you.

Chill.

 

As I understand it-and please forgive me if my geography is lacking-America and Mexico share a border. The countries adjoin one another. How is it that they are segregated by "a few hundred miles"? I believe Canada also shares a border to the North. What on earth are you on about?

 

Sure, it can mean "maybe not killing all, but killing a real big bunch."

And it can mean 'a hyperbolic figure-of-speech for some sort of adverse action." Is that what you mean?

Sort of like the lawyer lady who screamed I "raped her office" when I borrowed a printer she never used?

 

Why not look up the definitions, or read those I posted before.

Comedy is not your strong point.

- - - Updated - - -

Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_definitions

 

So why did you feel Jewish ancestry might be even remotely relevant to the discussion. I'm actually a lapsed Catholic as I explained. Is that relevant? As to my ancestry I have no idea beyond about 1650; that's as far back as I can trace my recent ancestors to Scotland, my Baronetcy and Clan.

You'll have noted my family crest in my avatar.

 

He misspoke. He meant a few hundred feet, not miles.

 

Lol... in one ear and out the other.

 

Just that in my ten years of direct experience I have found Jews and people of Jewish origin to be the most aggressive in matters of third world immigration into the US and Europe, while of course not wishing it for the Jewish state.

Thanks for the clarification.

 

So you attack me. Good for you. Bigotry when challenged whines like a baby.

- - - Updated - - -

More bigoted lies.

 

Ah, I see instead of sticking to a simple definition from an online dictionary:

"

."

You decided to use Wikipedia so you could cherry pick from a several page article

Nice trick but right back atcha

Let's have some specific examples of where this is being done

 

Ah, you're willing to go with the far left position when it suits your play-the-victim purposes? The push to expand the definition of genocide remains controversial. But I would go with the UN Definition:

As is explained by William A. Schabas in his essay on the UN web page on the Genocide convention, "... judicial interpretation of article II has remained relatively faithful to the intent of the drafters of the provision. Thus, it remains confined to the intentional physical destruction of the group, rather than attacks on its existence involving persecution of its culture or the phenomenon of “ethnic cleansing”.

And don't start yelling 'rape' either.

 

........more crickets as expected. Supremacists in glass houses shouldnt throw stones.

 

It's either silence, insults, or personal attacks.

It shows it is all they have.

 

This whole thread is ugly. How is it still open? There's some racist mother (*)(*)(*)(*)ers around here.

 

It is open because it meets the rules and is a good thread. No one forces you to add to it, but if you choose to, I would not throw personal abuse out.

 

That's because you didn't address the issue at hand.