The vaccine causes deadly blood clots.

So tell me why health professionals are instructed not to assign post-vax AEs as what they are - vax-induced? And why have so many doctors been ostracized or have lost their license after questioning the safety & efficacy of vaxxes? Conspiracy? Of course it's a conspiracy because it requires a govt- and corporate-level plan to successfully carry this out. Dr. Michael Yeadon's expose of Pfizer is just the tip of the iceberg. This is a govt-corporate conspiracy.

But that doesn't matter. What matters is the scientific facts & data - that vaxxes are extremely deadly & provide no health benefit.

 

They aren't.

They haven't.

No, fabrication.

Hilarious. The competence of government knows no bounds, yet the bits where they are incompetent are only noticed by conspiracy theorists. Cue laughter-track.

It's the tip of a very small turd.

Nope. It's batshittery.

We finally agree.

Uhuh.

That's batshittery. They aren't and they do.

 

Here's the simple logic backed by science:

(a) There's no valid scientific study confirming the existence of a virus or viral contagion.
(b) It follows that all 'interventions' designed specifically to address a viral contagion, particularly 'vaccines', are useless.
(c) If follows that relatively sudden & unexplainable health disorders & deaths occurring within a short time to a few months of an inoculation can most likely be attributable to the vaccine.
(d) Conclusion: Vaccines are both highly toxic & confer no health benefit.

So, on this simple basis, VAERS cases (not to mention international data/cases on AEs) does indeed correlate to vaccine-induced AEs.

No, not noticed by 'conspiracy theorists' - but by those who are not given to blind belief, and who are willing to question the official narrative & do their own research.

There are hundreds of historic examples of govt (and corporate) conspiracies that are widely accepted & known - even by mainstream sources & scholars. So why would it suddenly be unthinkable to posit that the govt is still involved in conspiracies?

 

Explain this.

Why Did the CDC Silence the Million Dollar Harvard Project Charged With Upgrading Our Vaccine Safety Surveillance System?
https://truthsnitch.com/2017/10/24/...upgrading-vaccine-safety-surveillance-system/

 

Because those doctors are NOT following EBP. Look just as your mechanic has to follow the manual to fix your car so a medical officer has to prove they are following “best practice” and that is a system we call EBP or Evidence Based Practice AKA Evidence Based Medicine. There are a TON of EBP resources available to the health professionals few “government owned”. EPB is how we know that honey is better than manure for wound healing
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7693943/

Explanation of EBP https://wounds-uk.com/journal-articles/evidence-based-practice/

 

Because it probably didn’t. My first step would be to validate the claim made by someone calling themselves “truth snitch”.
I would also keep in mind that the USA and the CDC are not the only vaccine safety programs run by a government

 

Here's the latest stuff I've come across.

Funeral director John O’Looney - there are NO clots in un-jabbed people
https://www.brighteon.com/5d7291b2-9196-4744-942d-8c1c57a29502

Evidence in the Blood - A Visit with Funeral Director John O'Looney
https://www.brighteon.com/b12c6f29-ec53-44ea-a64f-dde4abe171ea

 

Here's a question: what is the definition of bias?

If a loony funeral director was a staunch antivax proponent, would you expect him to give an honest and detailed account? The answer is of course a resounding no. See batshit, post batshit, no scientific analysis whatsoever.

Leading anti-vaxxer finally admits COVID is real after being taken to ICU with virus
"A leading British anti-vaxxer has admitted COVID is real after being taken to an intensive care unit (ICU) with the virus.

Funeral director John O'Looney, 53, had claimed coronavirus was “just a common cold” and refused to be vaccinated.

He was due to appear at the 'Freedom Rally' event in Milton Keynes last Wednesday, alongside fellow anti-vaxxer Piers Corbyn, where protesters stormed a pantomime and NHS test site.

But O'Looney could not attend after being struck down with COVID last month and hospitalised.

In a written statement to his followers, shared last Friday, he admitted the virus was “an enemy to face”.

He wrote: "I was initially sceptical about COVID but I can confirm its validity and it is very nasty.”

 

Here's John O'Looney's letter. He's capable of modifying his opinion when he gets some new info.

Whistleblower John O’Looney Rescued from Hospital by Team of Activists
https://bluecat.media/whistleblower-john-olooney-rescued-from-hospital-by-team-of-activists/
(excerpt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Sadly I was taken down 14 days ago with suspected Covid and whilst I have always said there is a “virus” I can confirm I genuinely believe this is man-made virus, in fact it is an awful virus. So let us make no mistake, there is an enemy to face but does it require endless bouts of injections after injections after injections? Clearly not – all man made and man driven. I standby what I have said from day one – as a funeral director I have seen first hand huge efforts made to deliberately inflate Covid death numbers.

There were no excess deaths in 2020 – it is that simple, and nothing will change my mind – all the minds of those in the industry who have their eyes open to this lie – and there are many.

The reality is the death rate only soared the moment they began putting needles into arms in January 2021. You can believe it or not, but I was one of the people picking up these poor souls and a huge amount of them.
Fast forward and now we see a huge increase in thrombosis related deaths exclusively in jab recipients.

Very interestingly, recently I was admitted to ICU in Milton Keynes hospital after developing Covid symptoms. I took three lateral flow tests whilst there and was told at the time I was not positive only to be told later on the ward I was positive, so clearly it was inconclusive – so I will say I felt and feel terrible still.

But fundamentally for me things have changed very much in the hospitals, and one of the very first people to visit my bedside was a representative from Oxford University (funded by the Gates foundation) begging me to trial new medicines (whilst being unable to look me in the eye) not even related to Covid – naturally I declined.

I was told I would die and these medicines would be my last chance, again I declined and stuck to my guns. Trust me that’s not an easy thing to do laying there in a hospital ward on your own, unable to breathe easily and denied any family support or visits.

It is deliberate and it is done to break you. There seems to be more emphasis on encouraging me to be a guinea pig than actually treating me, and I looked across at other people in the ward with sadness. They were all vaccinated without exception – in fact to my knowledge I was the only one in the ward unvaccinated – they will probably be all gone now…

And I was reminded “how selfish I was” even in the ambulance on the way there, I **** you not…. The Hospital environment has fundamentally changed beyond recognition for me, and whilst there were shadows and echoes of what it once was, it’s a very different place now ,and I suspect it is already being fully privatised we just haven’t been told.

The “food” was appalling and all tasted the same. I’m not sure if this was due to Covid symptoms, but there was like a horrible oil over everything – puddings & dinners. It took at least 3 or 4 days to get the taste out of my body, it was disgusting.

Moving forward, I suspect as people come down with Covid there will be greater and greater efforts made to target children especially in the new year, with injections, and I would urge you to take your children out of school rather than allow this to happen. When I attended a meeting in September I was told in no uncertain terms that up to 70% of these children would be sterilised as a side effect and there will be many that will die as a result of myocardia.

If given these injections many will die of myocardia if received, and this I do not doubt will come to pass so please keep in mind what I have heard in this meeting, and I have sat in front of Sir Graham Brady at Westminster.

I feel very fortunate to have escaped hospital (I never dreamt I would have lived to say that) with the help of family and friends.

I was initially sceptical about Covid but I can confirm it’s validity and it is very nasty.
But I can also tell you it is 100% man-made, this is not a natural virus and it is an attack on all of us – it’s a bio weapon. My advice to you moving forward is network, prepare and under all circumstances try to avoid going into hospital because I suspect many of the poor souls I saw in there will never ever leave having become test tubes for the Gates foundation.

The sinister whispering, the secrecy and the guilty looks amongst certain members of staff spoke volumes to me. It was honestly very chilling and traumatising just seeing how it has changed – especially when I asked to leave. The tactics used to try and force me to stay were sadistic to say the least and that is as much detail as I can go into except to say I feel very very lucky to have gotten out.

Thank you for coming today I wished I could be with you but it has actually exhausted me even just dictating this message to you all. I will recover and get stronger over the next few weeks and then resume my duty’s caring for others.

Please appreciate this time I have to focus on myself and my family and it has been a rollercoaster of pain at this time.

I just need time – please bear with me and leave me to heal and eventually I will be back.”

John O’Looney – Funeral Director Whistleblower
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This video says "2 days ago" but I'm not sure when it was made. He still thinks the vaccine is causing clots. I think that if he gets some proof that shows otherwise, he'll modify his opinion.

John Waters and John O'Looney had a candid discussion regarding the CULLING of HUMANITY
https://rumble.com/v5jwn9x-john-wat...candid-discussion-regarding-the-culling-.html


Here's more on John O'Looney.

https://odysee.com/$/search?q=John O'Looney
https://rumble.com/search/all?q=John O'Looney

 

OMG, again!? The most inept "culling" attempt in history!

 

You mean these dissident doctors are being ostracized & losing their license because they're following the principles of evidence based medicine. That is, their knowledge of a patient's medical & personal history + clinical research confirms that the vaxxes are causing the post-vax events - even if they're unfamiliar with the plethora of negative research concerning vaxxes. The medical industry (and its media surrogates) in the US is highly controlled by big pharma - from medical school to actual practice.

You can read Harvard's 3-year report on its ESP:VAERS investigation here:

https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/defa...ion/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf

The report makes it clear that the CDC is not interested in pursuing a thorough process of monitoring vaccine AEs.

Under 'Results' the report states:
Unfortunately, there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessments because the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available and the CDC consultants responsible for receiving data were no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation.

Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS)
Results: Restructuring at CDC and consequent delays in terms of decision making have made it challenging despite best efforts to move forward with discussions regarding the evaluation of ESP:VAERS performance in a randomized trial and comparison of ESP:VAERS performance to existing VAERS and Vaccine Safety Datalink data. However, Preliminary data were collected and analyzed and this initiative has been presented at a number of national symposia.
https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/defa...ion/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf

But there's still a problem with the new ESP:VAERS:
They followed the records of these individuals for 30 days only, and identified a possible 2.6% of them that may have had a reaction to one or more of the administered vaccines in that time period?? This doesn't even get into possible effects that begin to show after 30 days (autoimmune disorders or many cancers, for example). And we're seeing 2.6% and the awareness that FEWER than 1% of possible adverse events are being reported? One would think that the CDC, if truly looking out for our best interest as consumers; would have immediately started to implement the model used by the Harvard Pilgrim group and indeed would have extended out the observation period so they could begin to determine what to study next to best refine their definitions of vaccine adverse effects and multi-vaccine effects. However, as you saw above it was quite the opposite and remains so to this day. CDC, where art thou?
file:///C:/Users/user2/Downloads/CDC-2022-0111-84601_attachment_3.pdf

-----------------------------------------------

Further unresolved issues that clearly show the govt is deliberately working with big pharma to cover up vax AE reporting.

Problems with VAERS
* staffing levels failed to keep pace with the unprecedented number of reports since the rollout of covid vaccines
* there are signs that the system is overwhelmed
* reports aren’t being followed up
* signals are being missed
* The BMJ has spoken to more than a dozen people, including physicians and a state medical examiner, who have filed VAERS reports of a serious nature on behalf of themselves or patients and were never contacted by clinical reviewers or were contacted months later.
* Our investigation has also found that, in stark contrast to the US government’s handling of adverse reaction reports on drugs and devices, the publicly accessible VAERS database on vaccines includes only initial reports, while case updates and corrections are kept on a separate, back end system. Officials told The BMJ that this was to protect patient confidentiality—but this means that patients, doctors, and other public users of the database have access only to an incomplete and uncorrected version.
https://welcometheeagle.substack.com/p/the-bmj-investigates-the-broken-system

Less than 1% of vax AEs are being reported.
* Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.
* Most parents aren’t even aware the VAERS system exists, much less aware that they are supposed to be reporting to it.
* Health care providers are “supposed” to report adverse events, but we have no idea of the efficiency level with which this is occurring, and more than a hunch that this reporting is grossly neglected for a variety of reasons.
* Furthermore, many vaccine adverse events are never reported because either the parent, patient, or doctor is completely unaware that a subsequent adverse event is in fact due to a vaccine.
file:///C:/Users/user2/Downloads/CDC-2022-0111-84601_attachment_3.pdf

VAERS reports are deleted, reports are not entered, symptoms are fabricated/altered, followups are not done, and publications are throttled
Like others interviewed by The BMJ, Sullivan experienced limited follow-up after submitting his VAERS report. He received only a temporary report number months after his initial submission.
A physician named “Helen” (pseudonym) told The BMJ that fewer than 20% of concerning reports get follow-up, including many deaths she reported.
In consultation with Benavides, an audit by React19 found that 1 in 3 COVID-19 vaccine adverse events reports in VAERS were either not posted publicly or were deleted. React19 is a nonprofit that collects stories of people injured by the mRNA vaccines.
According to The BMJ, of those queried by React19, “22% had never been given a permanent VAERS ID number and 12% had disappeared from the system entirely.”
Benavides, who publishes the VAERSAware dashboards documenting many of the problems with VAERS, said there is even deeper dysfunction in the VAERS system — from inventing symptoms to deleting reports.
“VAERS does not publish all legitimate reports received,” Benavides told The Defender. “They throttle publication of reports. They even delete legitimate reports.”
https://expose-news.com/2023/11/15/cdc-runs-two-vaers-systems-the-public-can-only-view-one-of-them/

CDC Runs Two VAERS Systems – The Public Can Only View One of Them
Recently an investigation by The BMJ into VAERS, found multiple deficiencies in the system, including the revelation that the government runs two systems — one for the public, and a private back-end system that contains all of the corrections and updates, including deaths that occurred after an initial injury.
https://expose-news.com/2023/11/15/cdc-runs-two-vaers-systems-the-public-can-only-view-one-of-them/

You mean V-safe, the VSD, and the CISA Project? They're all carried out under the auspices of the CDC & FDA - none of which are reliable or can be trusted to reflect the true scope of vax AEs.

 

This only shows that O'Looney wasn't familiar with the no-virus research. If he was, he wouldn't succumb to the pseudoscientific claims of virology.

Where's the science? Where's the evidence that O'Looney was sickened by a 'virus'? O'Looney believes in viruses, and so naturally he would blindly believe he was sickened by a 'Covid virus'. I didn't know assumptions were part of the scientific method.

Why was it not a very bad 'flu' (caused by 5G, and the adding of more 5G towers & 5G satellites)? All I can say is that O'Looney is fortunate not to have taken the shot. He may not have survived this illness - and is lucky he survived the hospital treatment.

 

The "viruses-don't-exist" batshittery is as bad as the Flat Earth. Luckily, very few people are taken in by this absolutely absurd horseshit.

p.s. Those who advocate 5G as the cause for covid-19 hospitalizations are of a similar category.

 

A wall of red batshit. News alert, nobody cares, nobody is reading it and highlighting virtually all of it in red is as useful as a chocolate fireguard.

 

You got a better explanation than the pseudoscience of 'viruses'?

We know that artificial EMF causes numerous health disorders (including hypoxia, respiratory problems, and mitochondrial dysfunction, among others), and sudden, unusual health disorders were observed since the days of the telegraph lines - and have only increased since in concert with the substantial increase in EMF. So why wouldn't 5G do the same - but be worse? There's also evidence that solar activity (cycles of lows & highs) can cause flu-like illnesses and occurred in parallel to early 'pandemics' (eg, the 'black plague'). And if a person is extra sensitive to EMF (many are, and some have committed suicide because they couldn't get relief), they will fair much worse - although EMF affects every person & animal (and even plants) to some degree.

And this EMF assault is added to by the assault from multiple vaccinations that virtually every person on the planet has had - not to mention the assault from exposure to toxic pesticides, industrial contaminants, fluoride/other chemicals in tap water, poor air quality, junk food, food additives, medical drugs, and so on.

 

Yep. Oh, and it isn't "pseudo".

You aren't a "we".

Nope.

 

If it wasn't pseudo, you would've posted some science studies confirming the claims of virology. But still, after all this time, you still can't produce a single scientifically valid study.

 

Hilarious. Can you think of any other reason why I didn't? Here's a few. Don't care. Can't be bothered. What's the point? Waste of time.

I thought you'd got it:

The "viruses-don't-exist" batshittery is as bad as the Flat Earth. Luckily, very few people are taken in by this absolutely absurd horseshit.

 

No because they are NOT following EBP. There would be NO, NADA, ZERO basis for even a mild reprimand if they were.
VAERS has nothing to do with EBP

 

It is worse than horseshit because at least THAT is good for the roses!

 

Oh! Dear! Take a walk to your nearest medical library - usually even private libraries will let you walk in and do some reading, then look at the stacks or just ask the librarian if there are any texts on virology. I think the term “small mountain of data is a vast understatement

 

What is this?

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-73162-5

 

'EBP' is meaningless if (1) scientists/doctors continue to look in the wrong place for the cause of diseases - eg, not considering the possibility of vax-induced poisoning, and (2) if the data is doctored, deleted, not reported, or lack followups. Govt-big pharma collusion is making every effort to obstruct the proper channels for scientific inquiry & data transparency.

I've asked Betemax to show me just one valid scientific study - and I'm still waiting.

There's even a sizeable reward for anyone who can.

1.5 million € prize for proof of a coronavirus! An update from Germany
https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/15-million-prize-for-proof-of-a-coronavirus

<sigh> So much is wrong with this 'study', but I'll just mention the two biggest issues:

------------------------
The authors state:

* SARS-CoV-2 isolate (HIAE-02: SARS-CoV-2/SP02/human/2020/BRA (GenBank accession number MT126808.1) was used in this work.

This is not an 'isolate'. The 'isolate' the authors are referring to is actually a non-isolated/unpurified sample provided to them from elsewhere, and claimed to contain or be 'infected' with said virus. The GenBank submission was created entirely in silico - not from an actual isolated/purified viral particle that was physically characterized, identified, and dissected to extract its genetic material for sequencing.

It is this fabricated “genome” that was submitted to GenBank on the 5th of January 2020, and seized on by Drosten et al. to help produce their phoney PCR protocol assay sequences - which in turn were published with indecent haste by the WHO for all the world to use, thereby turning WH-Human 1 into the world’s reference genome for a claimed pathogen.

The genomes said to belong to 'viruses' are never sequenced from purified/isolated particles taken from the samples directly from a sick person. They are either sequenced from unpurified bodily fluids containing many sources of host and other 'non-viral' microorganisms or they are taken from unpurified cell cultures which contain numerous sources of foreign contaminants.

Here you go. Why don't you learn in the following video how an in silico genome is created. Then come back to me if you can cite a single study in which a genomic sequence was derived from the physical extraction of an actual, physically isolated/purified viral particle.

https://ugetube.com/watch/dr-andrew...at-is-a-in-silico-genome_rPpez4qPblLcRvI.html

------------------------
The authors state:

* The virus was grown in Vero cells (Monkey African Green kidney cell line – ATCC CCL-81) in the Laboratory of Molecular Virology, at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Vero cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS; GIBCO) at 37 °C and 5% CO2.

If the 'infected' sample they received for their study actually contained viral particles, then why the need to 'culture' the sample with Vero (or any other) cells? Why couldn't they simply isolate the viral particles directly from the sample & take photos of it? Why the need to 'grow' it?

And if they had to 'grow' the viral particles, how did the makers of the 'infected' sample confirm that the sample had any viral particles - let alone any viral contagions that can cause disease? This then begs the question: If a sick person is diagnosed as "Covid-19 Positive" by some 'test' and assumed to be 'infected', why should any scientist have to 'culture' or 'grow' the viral particles in foreign material (or any other material) if they're already in the patient's blood, plasma, lung fluids, snot, etc?

Do you not see the problem here? Do you not see that it is the lab procedure itself - the use of 'Viral Transport Media' - that causes what is called the "cytopathic effect"? Further, what virologists call 'isolation' is the cytopathic effect, which they assume is the result of a virus. There's no actual (physical) viral isolation, let alone purification, involved in their so-called 'isolation.'

NOTE: Vero cells are commonly used in 'viral' cell cultures because they're susceptible to destruction from the antibiotics/antifungals (among other sought-after properties) used in the 'Viral Transport Media'. When destroyed, these cells break open, releasing numerous internal components. Some of these components include exosomes & extracellular vesicles that look identical to what are called 'viruses' - ie, identical in shape, size, appearance, and contents (like genetic material). Hence the reason why lab scientists believe (falsely) that the cells were destroyed by viral particles rather than from exposure to toxins.

The proof is clear that 'virologists' are confusing 'viruses' with cellular components. I already posted a good deal of info about EVs (extracellular vesicles), MVBs (multivesicular bodies), exosomes, protein corona, staining, and other elements of cellular components here.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/face-masks-made-‘little-to-no-difference’-in-preventing-spread-of-covid-scientific-review-finds.608252/page-8#post-1074138152

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/face-masks-made-‘little-to-no-difference’-in-preventing-spread-of-covid-scientific-review-finds.608252/page-7#post-1074107453

Here's an excerpt from my post:

(Feb 2021) Hunting coronavirus by transmission electron microscopy - a guide to SARS-CoV-2-associated ultrastructural pathology in COVID-19 tissues
Compared to other in-situ techniques, transmission electron microscopy is the only method to visualise assembled virions in tissues, and will be required to prove SARS-CoV-2 replication outside the respiratory tract. In practice, documenting in tissues the characteristic features seen in infected cell cultures seems to be much more difficult than anticipated. In our view, the hunt for coronavirus by transmission electron microscopy is still on.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32981112/

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15744573/

A chance for denial. It really is the same with flat earthers. Notice also the comedy "reward" for anyone who proves it? Notice who decides the "reward" is handed out.

 

This is only an abstract. Where's the rest of it? It appears, with the exception of the horse feces, the entire 'study' was carried out in silico. The authors state...

* Virus DNA was isolated from horse faeces and cloned in a sequence-independent fashion.

How was the 'viral DNA' 'isolated'? Was it physically extracted from an isolated virion - or was it free-floating DNA in a soup of other genetic material & cellular debris, and assumed be of viral provenance because it happens to match closely with GenBank's database? We've already seen how 'isolation' is a term used by virologists that means something other than physical isolation. And how did they know the DNA they're referring to is actual DNA from a virus when all they're doing is comparing it to GenBank submissions - when not a single GenBank submission (of viral genome sequences) has yet been confirmed to have come from a virus?

* 268 clones were sequenced and 178140 nucleotides of sequence obtained.

How was it 'sequenced'? Physically or in silico?

* Statistical analysis suggests the library contains 17560 distinct clones derived from up to 233 different virus genomes. TBLASTX analysis showed that 32% of the clones had significant identity to GenBank entries.

How did they populate their 'library'?

Note that TBLASTX analysis was used, which is a computational procedure with no actual (physical) viral particle required:

TBLASTx, or translated BLASTx, is a program that compares nucleotide sequences to protein sequence databases by translating them into amino acid sequences and comparing them at the amino acid level:

• How it works
  TBLASTx translates both the query and database nucleotide sequences into six-frame amino acid sequences, and then compares the resulting 36 protein sequences.
• Why it's useful
  TBLASTx is a sensitive way to compare transcripts to genomic sequences without needing to know any protein translation. It's also useful for annotating coding regions on a nucleotide sequence and detecting frame-shifts in those regions.
• Computational intensity
  TBLASTx is computationally intensive. MegaBLAST is often faster and can be used for batch analysis of short transcript sequences

It's simple: Produce or cite a single study that includes the following:

1. A valid control
2. Physical isolation & purification of the virus
3. Genomic sequencing via physical extraction of genetic material from an actual isolated virus

And the following would be nice too, but impossible to do without first carrying out No. 2 above.

4. If the virus can be physically isolated & purified, prove that said virus is infectious & disease-causing by administering it into a healthy subject.

Note that Dr. Robert Willner deliberately exposed himself to the blood of an 'HIV-positive' individual live on TV - twice - to prove that HIV doesn't exist.

Dr Willner (a medical doctor of 40 years experience) an outspoken whistleblower of the AIDS hoax.

In front of a gathering of about 30 alternative-medicine practitioners and several journalists, Willner stuck a needle in the finger of Andres, 27, a Fort Lauderdale student who says he has tested positive for HIV. Then, wincing, the 65-year-old doctor stuck himself.

In 1993, Dr. Willner stunned Spain by inoculating himself with the blood of Pedro Tocino, an HIV positive hemophiliac. This demonstration of devotion to the truth and the Hippocratic Oath he took, nearly 40 years before, was reported on the front page of every major newspaper in Spain. His appearance on Spain's most popular television show envoked a 4 to 1 response by the viewing audience in favor of his position against the "AIDS hypothesis." When asked why he would put his life on the line to make a point, Dr. Willner replied: "I do this to put a stop to the greatest murderous fraud in medical history. By injecting myself with HIV positive blood, I am proving the point as Dr. Walter Reed did to prove the truth about yellow fever. In this way it is my hope to expose the truth about HIV in the interest of all mankind."