They should make it a crime to do vasectomies & tubals even if patient wants it.

Those who read my posts know that I believe that they must make sex change abominations criminal as that's surgically mutilating a man to make him a fake woman or in Chastity Bono's case, it's surgically mutilating a woman to make her a fake man. Transexuals are worse than the gays & lesbians. This post will be about something which should be abolished & it's sterilization surgeries. While I'm pro-choice on abortion, I'm against sterlizations. There's birth control such as the pill, condoms & old fahshioned Rhythm Method. Sterilization surgeries however are mutilations. Unless it's a hysterectomy to save a life, they must make it a crime to do sterilizations. Sterilizations are spaying & neutering people. Also they make less attractive. All things=, if you have an intact woman vs. a woman who has been spayed, most men would take the intact woman. Same thing with a man who is intact vs. a man who has had a vasectomy, most women would choose the intact man ve. the neutered man. Yet these are things you almost never hear. Anyhow, don't see mutilations as a civil right. Women right groups should be against tubals & it's not a sexist topic because it's also against vasectomies. Science must be about creation not destruction whether it's raising fertility, IVF and findin cure for menopause. If a cure is discovered for menopause, many women would take the cure. What do you think ?

 

LOL! Nearly fell off my golden throne here reading your attempt to get womens' groups, i.e. one like the feminists led by Gwen to weigh in on and agreeing to limit a woman's choice to have a tubal. What do you think fun, think the feminists will come aboard to help stop this nonsense? Btw, my Chinese sister-in-law is named Fun.

 

An argument women's groups could make against tubal ligations is this 'I'm a woman not a dog.' Science as said should be about creation not destruction. It must be said that if a cure is discovered, many women would take the cure.

 

I think it is a nutty fascist idea.

 

It's no surprise that an apologist for gay & lesbian sexual behaviors would say this. Spaying & neutering are to prevent pet overpopulations so that dogs & cats don't starve to death or end up being killed as nobody adopts these animals. But it would be interesting to know if there are any feminists who are pro-choice on abortion but oppose sterilization surgeries. There are feminists who are pro-life such as ex Governess Sarah L. Palin. Again, there's birth control such as pills, condoms & Rhythm method or a person can be celibate. Hope that women will also give their view in that would women rather have sex with a man who is intact or neutered, all things =. & all things =, most men would choose a woman who is intact vs. a woman who is spayed. When people have had sterilization surgeries then that is damaged.

 

Most women I know believe women have the right to determine their fertility- and that includes everything from birth control pills to tubal ligation.

Most men prefer to have sex- and hope that the women don't get pregnant at an inconvenient time.

As I said- your proposal is a nutty fascist idea.

 

I dated a Chinese girl name Fun Tang /rimshot

 

You have got to be kidding me. That post, and your opinion, is complete and utter rubbish.

You don't have the right to tell other people whether they can undergo surgery or not - and if you think that men prefer a woman who doesn't have her tubes tied, why are so many men still married to women who had that procedure?

 

With your second part, many of the men married to women who have had tubal ligations don't even have sex with them anymore. These men end up looking for women who are fertile because it's boring for them to do it with a woman who has been spayed. After a woman has become menopausal, many to most men stop having sex with her & sexless marriages are most likely to happen after a woman has become menopausal. What they must do is look for a cure for menopause & how to raise fertility not destructions. A woman who is spayed eventually becomes boring to their men that many of the men look for fertile women to have affairs with. I support other birth control such as condoms, the Pill & Rhythm Method. I'm also pro-choice on abortion. However, tubal ligations & vasectomies are mutilations which must be criminalized. Incidentally, they've found that vasectomies do raise cancer risks. Tubal lgations and vasectomies are useless. Yes we should have the right to tell people that they can't mutilate healthy body parts which is what tubals & vasectomies are. The worst case of medical mutilations are sex changes which must be criminalized.

 

Would you mind posting a link supporting ANY of the nonesnse in this post?

 

Having surgery to remove your appendix also mutilates your body and leaves a scar. I guess you are against that, too?

 

Having surgery to remove your appendix also mutilates your body and leaves a scar. I guess you are against that, too?

 

Yeah, pretty much. This one pinned the kook-o-meter.

 

An appendectomy is to save a person's life. If a person has diseased limbs which must be amputated so as to save a person's life, then that is 1 thing. Let me also repeat that if a woman has a disease which requires hysterectomy as no other known options are available to her, then that is also 1 thing. What I'm against is a Dr. mutilating a healthy person's body parts because the person demands this such as sex change mutilations or a Dr. amputating healthy limbs because the person thinks he or she has 1 arm instead of 2-amputee identity disorder. Vasectomies & tubal ligations are a Dr. maiming healthy body parts because a person demands this-that is what must be made illegal. It's also again not a 'man controlling women's bodies' as it's abolishing both vasectomies & tubals. If a woman were to say that she thinks vasectomies should be illegal, she would not be controlling men's bodies as she is also against tubals. Women rights groups should oppose tubal ligations as that's maiming healthy women.

 

I liked this post just because Margot didn't roflmmfao

 

You really just make all this stuff up don't you?

What 'men' are you talking about? If a woman didn't tell a man that she had had a tubal ligation he would never know.

And most men- essentially every man I know- would rather know that a woman is not going to have an unplanned pregnancy- most men- essentially every man I know or have known- do not find the prospect of an unplanned pregnancy 'exciting'.

What you propose is a nutty fascist idea, and you seem very uninformed as to what 'men' want.

 

Since SFJeff is an apologist for homosexual statutory rapist Harvey B. Milk and since SFJeff in past is an apologist for homosexuals who sexually abuse retarded boys as homosexual coward Stephen Starr did, SFJeff's views can't be taken seriously. Now SFJeff thinks it's Okay to spay a woman like a pet dog or cat, so SFJeff thinks of men and women as animals.

- - - Updated - - -

Since SFJeff is an apologist for homosexual statutory rapist Harvey B. Milk and since SFJeff in past is an apologist for homosexuals who sexually abuse retarded boys as homosexual coward Stephen Starr did, SFJeff's views can't be taken seriously. Now SFJeff thinks it's Okay to spay a woman like a pet dog or cat, so SFJeff thinks of men and women as animals.

 

I'm all for tubal ligations and vasectomies. There is so much more to life and being an incubator. Why exactly should we keep on making more people? We have enough already and could do with less.

 

What you propose is a nutty fascist idea, and you seem very uninformed as to what 'men' want.

 

But it's a good idea. World's replacement population such as in some European nations, Japan and China are below replacement population value. Population has gotten older as people live longer. We must be against gays, lesbians, and transexuals are the worst of all. Back to sterilizations, when population ages, then populations die off and you don't have enough engineers, workers, lawyers, accountants, and so on. We must raise fertility levels. Sex is mainly supposed to be about woman pleasuring man and viceversa incidental. Keeping wome fertile until they die keeps them sexually desirable which means as I've said finding cure for menopause and make woman who is 75 look like she did when she was 18 to 35 years old. Once woman becomes menopausal, it's recommended that man no longer have sex with her as she not pretty as she was when she was 18 to 35 years old.

 

Just nuttier and nuttier.

 

Tubal ligations and vasectomies are not the same as spaying and neutering. Spaying and neutering are taking out the ovaries and testicles. Tubal ligations are merely the fallopian tubes being blocked to prevent eggs from reaching the uterus. Vasectomies are just the cutting of the vas deferens, which is the tube carrying the sperm from the testicles to the urethra. Both are sometimes reversable. Spaying and neutering is NEVER reversible. Please don't post ignorant stuff. If you are against sterilization, just say it, don't make up lies conflating spaying with tubal ligations or neutering with vasectomies. Spaying and neutering is very much different from tubal ligations and vasectomies.

 

My view is right but nutty to apologists or homo&lesbian sexual behaviors & transexuality esp. those who are apologists for homosexual statutory rapist Harvey Bernard Milk.

Perdidochas, when I write 'spaying and neutering' I mean that vasectomies and tubals are the neutering & spaying of people. Yes, the spaying & neutering of dogs and cats to prevent pet overpopulation involves gelding & removal of ovaries. With pets, it's my view that cats should be returned to the wild as cats are meant to be wild but I know people who have cats as pets. While cats can be friendly & loyal, dogs remain man's best friend. Dogs can work as guides for the blind and handicapped. Getting back to topic, I'm against sterilizations of people no matter what they call this & believe in making sterilization surgeries crimes minus hysterectomies to save a life. Birth control such as pills, condoms and Rhythm suffice or be celibate. But no sterlization surgeries.

SFJeff, once a woman has become menopausal, there's no use in a man having sex with her anymore. It's like after a car has had 100,000 miles, most don't drive the car anymore & buy a new 1 or those who still do, usually don't drive as they used to. All things =, most men would want a woman with all parts intact vs. a woman who has been spayed. A tubal ligation is a damage to the body. If a woman has suffered cancer & had mastectomy, then she has become totalled and no reason for a man to have sex with her anymore. It's like if my 2011 VW Jetta (I like my car) got totalled in a wreck, I would not drive the car anymore & would go look for a new car. So for same reason, if a man's wife has suffered cancer which has required mutilation, then that's the end of ther sex life as the woman is now totalled. It's best for the couple to either become celibate or if the man wants sex, then the man should find young pretty women 18 to 35 years old to have sex with. Former Italian leader Silvio Berlusconi did the right thing when he paid young women to have sex with him after his wife became menopausal. Sex is mainly supposed to be about woman pleasuring man and viceversa incidental. Keeping wome fertile until they die keeps them sexually desirable which means as I've said finding cure for menopause and make woman who is 75 look like she did when she was 18 to 35 years old. Once woman becomes menopausal, it's recommended that man no longer have sex with her as she not pretty as she was when she was 18 to 35 years old.

 

Just nuttier and nuttier.

 

Just look at all the CRAP coming out of those toilets!