Top Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Aug 30, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,957
    Likes Received:
    1,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the manifests that they did not appear on were released immediately after the event, the version you are talking about was released by the fbi over a year later, the same people that put live explosives in the wtc in 1993.
     
  2. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Yes. Get one questionable "fact" wrong, it's doubtful the others will be any less wrong.

    My time is valuable.
     
  3. CircleBird

    CircleBird Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,811
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Truthers seem to be victims of debilitating confirmation bias.
     
  4. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So then, You have PROOF beyond a shadow of a doubt that 4 airliners were hijacked on 9/11/2001? where is it?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Please note that in the case of the taxpayer funded reports on the "collapse" events of WTC1, 2 & 7 there are a LOT of errors, so we then should throw out the entire lot, based on false info having been published?
     
  5. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    What is the point of trying to prove the existence of the planes to those who do their very best to ignore reality?

    The 'No-Plane' argument is up there with 'dustification' in its stupidity, and those who disseminate such inane ideas should be treated with the contempt they deserve.
     
  6. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So rather than actually supply evidence of the aircraft, its back to "truthers are crazy"
    or?
     
  7. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, the reverse burden of proof tactic was lame, and you can't demonstrate that the planes didn't exist, and all alternative hypotheses put forward are ridiculous....so...yes, 'no-planers' are beyond reason. Crazy is a bit strong, I prefer, 'intellectually challenged'.
     
  8. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The proving that airliners were NOT used, is a non-starter because
    you do not prove a negative. therefore the damning evidence is in the
    fact that there isn't any proof that the airliners actually crashed at the
    locations alleged by the official story.
     
  9. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL, is that jaMES Fetzer or something like that?

    WHO THINKS THIS ABSOLUTEL CLOWN-BOZO has any sanity to him?

    Once you guys show me a documentary with people on both sides and a panel that is actually credible, we can talk. For now, you have these bozos like fetzer as your sources, who no-one takes seriously (for a reason)
     
  10. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Boils down to a contest of "my experts are better than your experts" and I have to ask,
    do individuals exercise common sense these days?
     
  11. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nothing about the rest of his post,just what you cherry picked?

    VERY dishonest,Bob
     
  12. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-s...edentialed-professionals-need-only-apply.html

    Do you know any professors, or other qualified individuals who desire the bragging rights to having defeated the "truther" faction?

    Go for it guys!
     
  13. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Fetzer, Barrett, Chandler, Gage, Bollyn, Griffin & Jones aren't 'experts'.
     

Share This Page