Top Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Aug 30, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,812
    Likes Received:
    1,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [video=youtube;G6gtqAr241I]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6gtqAr241I[/video]

    I think this is well covered and within reason not disputable.

    Does anyone have a factual dispute?
     
  2. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I've been saying all along, there were NO hijackers
    & for a multitude of reasons that it simply could not
    have been as the official account tells it.
     
  3. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yet you have ZERO proof on that...
     
  4. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    and there is exactly zero proof that there were hijacked airliners used as weapons.
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wrong...wreckage, DNA,passenger luggage,manifests,plus people SAW them crash
     
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    His very first falsehood: #10 The hijackers names do not appear on any passenger manifest.

    This is patently false. The names were listed on the manifests. Premise of the thread has now been proven false.

    Try again.
     
  7. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The original news releases of the passenger lists, did not include the hijackers names and the later correction to that included the lame excuse that it was out of compassion for the victims families that they didn't list the obviously middle-eastern sounding names.
     
  8. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Source this claim.
    What you are saying here is a falsehood started by 'truthers'. It has no basis in fact.
     
  9. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So based on your dismissal of one point in the presentation, you dismiss the whole thing... (?) or? what?
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I was discussing the points one at a time.
    Do you agree that the first point (#10 since they are counting backward) was false? If so, we can move on to the next.
     
  11. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Given that the lame excuse for the list discrepancy is the difference between "victim list" & passenger list.... oh my! I am not going to give it the benefit of calling that one a journalistic mistake.

    there are bits that are pivotal to the argument such as the physical evidence that the airliners were actually crashed at the locations alleged by the mainstream media.
    this is the sort of thing that should be discussed in reference to proving the whole hijacker fiasco to be total fraud.
     
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The OP's first point is James Fetzer saying that the hijacker were listed on none of the flight manifestos. This has been proven a lie. Will you agree then that the first point raised in the video is incorrect? If so, we can move on to point number two. Scientifically, rationally.
     
  13. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Since it is debatable about the "lie" vs "journalistic error" in the reporting of the flight manifests or victim lists or whatever, its a non-point here. Therefore let us simply consider this one unresolved.
     
  14. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Stop hedging.....it was FALSE,the airlines used the manifest to connect names to seat numbers provided by flight attendants
     
  15. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    on the subject of wreckage, the argument has been raised that since everybody already knew exactly what happened, there was no need to examine the aircraft wreckage to note how much of it was recovered, however to then present the fact of there having been "wreckage" without any real data as to exactly how much of it there was, is completely BOGUS! because without a certified inventory of aircraft bits, it is a moot point as to the actual event that is did an airliner actually crash in the location where alleged?
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why did there need to be a 'certified inventory of aircraft bits'?.....
     
  17. jcarlilesiu

    jcarlilesiu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    28,330
    Likes Received:
    10,818
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Except thousands of eye witnesses and it caught on camera?

    Seriously?

    Wow.
     
  18. jcarlilesiu

    jcarlilesiu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    28,330
    Likes Received:
    10,818
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes.

    Get the facts straight, or be quiet.
     
  19. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The facts are that there isn't any physical proof that the alleged hijacked airliners existed at all, and that WTC1, 2 & 7 were destroyed by controlled demolition. The whole mainstream propaganda machine story is a CROCK!
     
  20. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,024
    Likes Received:
    3,624
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Those are falsehoods not facts
     
  21. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where is it documented that either "FLT11" "FLT175" "FLT77" or "FLT93" was actually accounted for in the recovered physical evidence?
     
  22. jcarlilesiu

    jcarlilesiu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    28,330
    Likes Received:
    10,818
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So... thousands of people all imagined things at the exact same time, while cameras caught it all on film?

    Good lord.

    You can't have a rational conversation with somebody that attempts to blatantly re-write history to align with their agenda.
     
  23. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What pictures, cite a reference.....
     
  24. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who said anything about pictures, bob?

    The evidence is overwhelmingly against your opinion.
     
  25. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,024
    Likes Received:
    3,624
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Asked and answered
     

Share This Page