Top Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Aug 30, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. EMTdaniel86

    EMTdaniel86 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Messages:
    9,380
    Likes Received:
    4,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Really? You're really asking that question?
     
  2. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    - - - Updated - - -

    YES, I am truly asking because the video that has been so often displayed as proof that "FLT175" actually crashed into the South Tower, is really proof that there wasn't any airliner there at all. what may have hit the building was a missile, but then that would be venturing into the area of speculation and I really want to stick with the bits that can be KNOWN.
     
  3. EMTdaniel86

    EMTdaniel86 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Messages:
    9,380
    Likes Received:
    4,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So you're saying that it wasn't an airline that crashed to the buildings? You would have a good argument expect you had how many people physical see a plane hit the building, Plus how many people around the world and country saw it on TV? That is what I love about 9/11 truthers, When one argument fails, come up with something that makes no sense.
     
  4. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In terms of the news-feed from the event, how many different cameras were active at the time? and the ONLY video that actually shows the south wall of the south tower being allegedly struck by "FLT175" were recorded and shown later, because there was NO live feed that showed a view of the south wall. and about the people who were in the street, I clearly remember a bit of live news coverage were an alleged airliner had just struck one of the towers and very clearly in the background somebody said "that is NO airliner", now the view from the street is far from unanimous on this subject, some witnesses state that it was a small commuter jet size aircraft ( most probably a missile at that point )
    and some reported seeing an explosion without any sign that there was an aircraft involved at all, that is no jet noise running up to the time of the explosion. Most people are NOT qualified plane spotters and for an alleged event such as was fabricated, the airliner would have been traveling at such a speed that any given individual at street level would only have a fraction of a second to acquire the target and focus on it and ID it before it was gone from view, the estimates vary from a sub-second flash to a 2 or 3 second window of opportunity to ID the ( whatever it really was ..... )
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    wrong...millions saw the second plane hit via live coverage,and no telling how many caught it on personal video recorders

    Give it up Bob,planes hit the towers and the pentagon....Quit tilting at windmills....
     
  6. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvCu8MlH0EU

    Here is an example of TV "news" coverage of the alleged accounting for alleged aircraft. Seeing something on TV is NOT proof that it happened, where is the physical evidence that PROVES "FLT11" "FLT175" "FLT77" & "FLT93" actually existed at all?
     
  7. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Seeing events unfold on TV has for YEARS been considered proof an event or crime happened bob,And the proof is in those 'buckets'...
     
  8. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    TV = Propaganda Machine, Vast Wasteland, (etc.... )
    NOT a source of hard evidence of anything!

    You can rely on what the talking heads on TV tell you,
    however there are people who KNOW, that all TV serves an agenda and that agenda is not always truth, but is indeed the total manipulation & abuse of the rank&file workers of this planet!
     
  9. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Now you're just being obstinate andignoring reality,bob
     
  10. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    so TV "news" = reality? ..... what?

    You are far too trusting of the mainstream propaganda machine.
     
  11. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes bob,despite your paranoia,it is reality,and has been used in legal proceedings as such

    You perhaps know something they don't?
     
  12. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - - - George Orwell
     
  13. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "The sky is falling!" -- Chicken Little

    Just as relevant.
     
  14. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I know something that you don't and that is the clear indications of controlled demolition in the case of the twin towers & 7 and also the signs of a total sleezoid cover-up in the case of not accounting for aircraft wreckage that wasn't there in the first place because the whole hijacked airliners story is fraud.
     
  15. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No .. you believe something that has no basis in fact.

    - - - Updated - - -

    No .. you believe something that has no basis in fact.
     
  16. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  18. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  19. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  21. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  22. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You claim it, but you don't link to it. Sad.

    Thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, were live witnesses as commercial jets impact the WTC towers ... one person (maybe) yells 'bomb!' ... I'd say that was an acorn, and not the whole sky falling, CL.
     
  23. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So, in your opinion of the scene on 9/11/2001, there were
    "Thousands, perhaps tens of thousands" who were looking up at the south wall of the South Tower at just the right time and had an unobstructed view of the tower so as to see the aircraft penetrate and were awake enough and skilled enough to spot the aircraft and positively identify it as a large commercial airliner?
    ( rather than a missile ) ......
     
  24. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,812
    Likes Received:
    1,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Really?

    Do tell, cite it
     
  25. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,812
    Likes Received:
    1,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    this is hilarious!
    PROOF??????

    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page