- - - Updated - - - YES, I am truly asking because the video that has been so often displayed as proof that "FLT175" actually crashed into the South Tower, is really proof that there wasn't any airliner there at all. what may have hit the building was a missile, but then that would be venturing into the area of speculation and I really want to stick with the bits that can be KNOWN.
So you're saying that it wasn't an airline that crashed to the buildings? You would have a good argument expect you had how many people physical see a plane hit the building, Plus how many people around the world and country saw it on TV? That is what I love about 9/11 truthers, When one argument fails, come up with something that makes no sense.
In terms of the news-feed from the event, how many different cameras were active at the time? and the ONLY video that actually shows the south wall of the south tower being allegedly struck by "FLT175" were recorded and shown later, because there was NO live feed that showed a view of the south wall. and about the people who were in the street, I clearly remember a bit of live news coverage were an alleged airliner had just struck one of the towers and very clearly in the background somebody said "that is NO airliner", now the view from the street is far from unanimous on this subject, some witnesses state that it was a small commuter jet size aircraft ( most probably a missile at that point ) and some reported seeing an explosion without any sign that there was an aircraft involved at all, that is no jet noise running up to the time of the explosion. Most people are NOT qualified plane spotters and for an alleged event such as was fabricated, the airliner would have been traveling at such a speed that any given individual at street level would only have a fraction of a second to acquire the target and focus on it and ID it before it was gone from view, the estimates vary from a sub-second flash to a 2 or 3 second window of opportunity to ID the ( whatever it really was ..... )
wrong...millions saw the second plane hit via live coverage,and no telling how many caught it on personal video recorders Give it up Bob,planes hit the towers and the pentagon....Quit tilting at windmills....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvCu8MlH0EU Here is an example of TV "news" coverage of the alleged accounting for alleged aircraft. Seeing something on TV is NOT proof that it happened, where is the physical evidence that PROVES "FLT11" "FLT175" "FLT77" & "FLT93" actually existed at all?
Seeing events unfold on TV has for YEARS been considered proof an event or crime happened bob,And the proof is in those 'buckets'...
TV = Propaganda Machine, Vast Wasteland, (etc.... ) NOT a source of hard evidence of anything! You can rely on what the talking heads on TV tell you, however there are people who KNOW, that all TV serves an agenda and that agenda is not always truth, but is indeed the total manipulation & abuse of the rank&file workers of this planet!
Yes bob,despite your paranoia,it is reality,and has been used in legal proceedings as such You perhaps know something they don't?
I know something that you don't and that is the clear indications of controlled demolition in the case of the twin towers & 7 and also the signs of a total sleezoid cover-up in the case of not accounting for aircraft wreckage that wasn't there in the first place because the whole hijacked airliners story is fraud.
No .. you believe something that has no basis in fact. - - - Updated - - - No .. you believe something that has no basis in fact.
You claim it, but you don't link to it. Sad. Thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, were live witnesses as commercial jets impact the WTC towers ... one person (maybe) yells 'bomb!' ... I'd say that was an acorn, and not the whole sky falling, CL.
So, in your opinion of the scene on 9/11/2001, there were "Thousands, perhaps tens of thousands" who were looking up at the south wall of the South Tower at just the right time and had an unobstructed view of the tower so as to see the aircraft penetrate and were awake enough and skilled enough to spot the aircraft and positively identify it as a large commercial airliner? ( rather than a missile ) ......
