Trump's posts are 'the utterings of an insane person': former RNC official

You perceived what you wanted, and the left responded to perceived hate with actual hate.

 

Seriously, do more research and you will see exactly what motivates an authentic, DC establishment do business as usual, Never-Trumper Republican.

Tim Miller (political strategist) - Wikipedia

 

Well, lets see, he had Sessions and then Barr to run the DOJ and probably at least another 30 in different positions in the DOJ. Educate yourself, please. Your argument has little base in fact.

 

Yeah, you say that a lot when you know you're wrong.

 

That’s a lot of assumptions you just put in an argument before telling someone else to get educated lol.

 

Nope, I’m genuinely correct. And you are genuinely not.

 

Sessions was a worthless patron, Barr was riding the retirement train. Trump not being a career politician, didn’t understand the swamps rules.

 

They weren't in power so that's irrelevant

 

They were so no it’s not. You don’t know what power actually is, nor how it manifests.

 

Trump's campaign rallies had the "LOCK HER UP" cheers and rode it into the Presidency. Republicans also took the Senate and the House so they, the right, were in control of 3 branches of govenment. They were in power and spare me your condescending attitude about power.

 

What are we discussing that you need evidence of.

 

Because she objectively committed a crime. But yes my point about power is true. You don’t know it.

 

The entire point of all these Trump threads. Alleged crimes that none of you give evidence to.

 

So well said.

 

For about seven years the left has been salivating over the plan to lock up DJT and you want to make a campaign slogan an example of the Republicans extremism? That's just laughable.

 

You are objectively wrong.

 

And yet you have no problem doing the same to Clinton. I will accept your apology when Trump is rightfully convicted.

 

He won’t be rightfully convicted as you have no evidence. Clinton objectively committed a crime and evidence was present of this.

Though considering how irrational many on the left have become I could see a meaningless wrongful conviction occurring that doesn’t actually result in anything thiugh.

 

Nope, you are objectively wrong.

 

And if you want to "lol", read, once again, my statement..."most" not "all".

 

No, we would not know. Grand jury proceedings are always kept secret. Have you ever served on a grand jury? I have.

Go fish.

 

Under normal circumstances. But the bias of these juries is beyond question. If it was there, we would know.

 

You don't know that, because you don't know who these jurors are. That, too, is never disclosed to the public until after their terms are over, and only then if they say it's OK.

All you're doing is reiterating the right wing "talking points," whi have no factual basis.

Keep fishing.

 

I do know that. The evidence has been made publicly available, the DA has also been publicly open about his biases. No fishing needed, this entire case is riddled with bias to a point it’s beyond question. As are most witch hunts.

 

Well the Grand Jury and DA in NY think there is enough evidence to go to trial so I'm guessing you're wrong, as usual.

So......tell me again why they didn't "LOCK HER UP". Oh yeah, cause ya got nothin'.

So the jury will be made up of bias left jurors? Trump's lawyers suck then.