Are you able to provide any instance of my ever having expressed "support for third world immigration" or are you just imagining it?
Because there is not need to confront a reality that is an illusion in your mind. The Nazi's, white supremacists and KKK all support the Democratic Party and Hillary.
Looks like you've made about 200 post in the last week. But here's one anti-white post you made, anti-white unless you want to claim you agree with neo-NAZI's that the GOP should be white. "That may be hunky dory with the neo-nazi and other white supremacist organizations that have publicly endorsed the media celebrity, but racial purity does not enhance elective chances in an increasingly-diverse nation as Republican strategists are painfully aware. " Yes, White suburban women seem to be driven into political limbo or the Democratic column by the crass trophy wife collector, but Hispanic Americans - along with Black Americans, Asian Americans, and Arab Americans - are likely to exhibit a DIY ethnic cleansing of the GOP in November." I'll be back with more post of yours. Here we go, you throwing cold water on the idea to build a wall. "While such a symbol is enthusiastically supported by racists, it's a very expensive symbol. Most illegal aliens take airlines to enter the US, and building a wall high enough to keep them out, whether it's a matter of specific religious discrimination or unspecified xenophobia, is impractical. Meanwhile a shovel to tunnel under a multi-billion dollar wall costs > $20. " FROM "WHY IS A BORDER WALL RACIST" your post #36
Claiming a person cant do the job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment." Why, bejeebers, did establishment Republican stiffs that have been sucking up to the Tantrump lately think neo-nazis and other white supremacists have been supporting and endorsing him?
So, I acknowledged the empirical demographic reality - the the US is an increasingly diverse nation - and that evokes Leon Trotsky in your mind? That strikes me as being very weird.
Kinda like claiming a Jewish Judge (almost half of the scotus) should recuse himself from a case involving a Palestinian -American.
You should have a little patience. I hadn't got through the 20 min time limit to edit my post, which I did. Your poring cold water on efforts to build a wall is gosmere thin cover for being pro-third world immigration. I know why Jews support third world immigration. They feel they are safer the more minorities there are in a country. Kinda confuses the Eagle with too many rabbits to nail. Not to mention Jewish organization mobilizing minority voters against Whitey. This also explains Jewish attacks on religion in order that they can drive Christianity out of public view and influence. Jews decided after WWII that any white Christian nation such as Germany was in 1930 is likely to turn NAZI at some point. Jews then promoted mass third world immigration and forced integration in order to blend whites out of existence. So it has been a two pronged attack. If you can destroy American Christianity you can make America safe for the Jews. If you can destroy the white race you can make America safe for the Jews. But in pursing these twin goals you inevitably bring about the hatred for Jews that you worry about in a NAZI America. You are full filling your own prophecy so to speak. As an intelligent Jew, Albert Einstein is reputed to have said, "Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is insane" or something to that effect. There is nothing I hate more than willful stupidity. And you people seem to be the world champs.
Your racist prattle is not only repugnant to Americans, it is misplaced. "You people" are prominent conservative White male Republicans such as Speaker Ryan and former Speaker Gingrich that have publicly denounced the crass show business performer's ugly, vicious remarks as "racist" and "unAmerican."
It's very stupid for hardcore Trumpies to underscore their messiah's insistence on his infallibility.
We are a very ethnically, racially, and religiously diverse people. Quite honestly, I am surprised that you have not heard of us before now. (I like your black-faced Chinese pooch in pancho and sombrero, incidentally. He'd be right at home in America.)
To Trump supporters: Very SERIOUS talk of changing GOP rules to prevent his nomination. Hopefully they fail. Trump will lose in a landslide. Go Trump!
WHY SOME OF THE SMARTEST PROGRESSIVES I KNOW WILL VOTE FOR TRUMP - ‪http://www.politico.com/magazine/st...16-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-213931‬
Antiestablishment American voters will vote for Sanders or Trump. Antiestablishment voters are now a supermajority. At this point change is a prerequisite for any progress. Yes, many progressives will vote against Clinton and for Trump - if they have to. They will vote for Sanders today.
If you want change, change Congress. Folks seem to think the President is the only person who matters in government.
If they want change they need to change every branch of the USG. Sanders and Trump are the only change candidates at the top.
That's my point. Focusing on the top alone isn't going to change anything. If you really want change, you need to be pushing to change Congress as well.
Supporting undifferentiated, unspecified "change" is silly. Replacing our government with a dictatorship would be "change"; is that what we're looking for? Shooting every other government employee would be "change"; is that what we're looking for? What you need is someone with specific ideas and solutions for change: Here is the specific problem, here is my specific and doable plan for addressing it. Trump doesn't provide that. he has identified some things he disagrees with (or claims to disagree with), but they tend to be general rather than specific (immigration policy, trade policy), and his "solutions" tend to be fantasy or simply "trust me". For example: Immigration: "No more illegal immigration! I'll build a wall that will stop it, and Mexico will pay for it!" The reality: It's simply impossible to stop all illegal immigration, just like you can't completely eliminate crime no matter how many police you hire. A wall would be hugely expensive and easily defeated, and Mexico is never going to pay for it. The most effective way to reduce illegal immigration is to reduce the incentives for coming here -- which means helping neighboring countries develop economic opportunities for their citizens, helping countries like Guatemala and El Salvador deal with their gang and drug problems, and cracking down on people who hire illegal immigrants. Do that and you won't need a wall.
I am not an activist. I am a voter. I will vote against every corrupt RP/DP candidate even if I have to write in an alternative. Trump and Sanders are the antiestablishment alternatives running for President. - - - Updated - - - Trump is not running for "Dictator". Surely you know that.
I find it refreshing that a candidate admits they don't know everything. Obama said he was going to do this and that only to find out when it came time to do this and that he discovered that he didn't have the authority to do any of this and that. And you fell for it during the elections. Now, you insist that all candidates follow suite and make Grand Exclamations about their plans to solve world hunger. What ever.