As mentioned before: when asked for evidence RWaF goes into insult mode. "The boy who cried 'shill'." Pathetic and predictable. The face of the 'truth cult'.
I would bet RWaF won't argue against Phil's position on the letsroll forum. Even he knows you can't have your own point of view over there.
I am open to many reasonable and logical positions, irrespective or their origin. I do not support that conclusion, and actually I haven't considered researching it at all, because, quite frankly, it seems ridiculous. I see no point in picking a fight with Phil over it though. It only serves to reinforce the shill agenda and I choose not to do as you would like me to do (for your own obvious reasons). Hey...this is fun...(not taking you seriously). I kinda like it.
In other words, you are afraid to challenge Phil's positions, so you will remain in silent complicity - all the while advocating them as a 'fountain of free flowing truth'. How nice to be a 'truther' and not notice your own self-contradictions.
I can't believe you passed up a prime opportunity to prove you're the honest guy you pretend to be! The ONLY reason you wouldn't defend your "good name" is because you're lying your ass off. Then again, that isn't news, is it.
No.....in other words...I see no point in helping your side with your agenda. Isn't that simple enough to comprehend?
You claim they are truthful, and in the same breath you claim you don't believe them, but you are afraid to tell them so. Lame excuses are lame.
Perhaps you need a sip from the fountain of free flowing truth. Make sure you tell them how much you disagree with their positions. Or continue to dodge. Your choice.
Tough (*)(*)(*)(*). Come on. Grow a pair and do something right for once. Either admit you've been lying your ass off or prove you're right. Think of all the people reading this and what they must think of you and the fact you run as fast as you can from every opportunity to prove your claims.
In other words, you don't give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about the truth. It is all about "foiling our agenda". BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!! That is a good one! Thanks for confirming what everyone already knows; that to you the truth is something to be feared and avoided at all cost.
If 'letsroll' is such a great forum for the free exchange of ideas ... why is its biggest advocate cowering from posting his own ideas there?
There ya go Pat....I knew you couldn't last too long. Attack mode...right on cue. Could you please pass the Grey Poupon?
Your only interest in this particular post is to possibly instigate a fight where there is none. He's much, MUCH closer to the truth than any of your team could possibly be. Next subject.
You're trying to dodge. There's no fight because you swallow everything Phil puts out. Either you believe in your position, or you don't. Then again, you are the one who said you trusted him enough to give him all of your personal information. I claim that planes were flown into the WTC and thousands of people lost their lives because of that. Phil claims NO planes hit the towers and NO ONE lost their lives in the towers. Now ... tell me again how he's closer to the truth.
Well...it's kinda like preaching to the choir over there. More entertaining to interact with more "official" advocates (at least today). You are a fine dancer...how's the airport treatin' ya these days?
Ummmm....he's "closer" to the truth because he advocates that the "official" BS story is well....BS, and you guys (your team), pretend all is in perfect order. See how that works? Surely you can grasp that simple premise.
He also advocates that no one died on 9/11. So do you, by supporting him. Unless you find the stones to tell him he's wrong. Which you won't. Now we know your position, thanks for clarifying.
No victims. No planes anywhere. Hollow towers. Smoke machines in the WTC. Yeah ... I don't think any of that is very truthful. You keep lapping it up though, complicit in your support and silence.
