Utah's Westminster College offers 'Porn' class where students will watch pornographic films together

~ It certainly did not hurt Richard Simmons .

​

 

Don't be silly it's okay if they're progressive brother and do it but if anyone on the conservative side does it there worthy of shame and ridicule!

 

Really? First I find pornography to be rather boring when I have indulged I fast forward most of it.

I've tried watching pornography with my partner and I found it... Uneasy. Pornography is a strange concept to me in the first place.

Did you have any of those issues with it when you and your girlfriend did it?

 

We are talking about the party that thinks it's perfectly okay for an adult man to dress as a drag queen and read to children.

 

If I was this guy is be proud of it. Refusing to be ashamed is the ultimate middle finger to those doing the shaming.

 

Do whatever it is you want just don't ask me to call you a woman!

A dude can wear a woman's clothes all day long as long as he's aware he's a dude wearing women's clothes.... When he starts thinking he is a she and the rest of us are required to entertain his delusion, that's where the problem begins!

 

Ahem…if someone on the ‘other side’ dressed in drag in public like Cawthorn, there’d be a flurry of hand-wringing and DeSantis-like comments of “groomer”, “perverted”, “sick”, etc….

 

And then folks like you would come along and call them homophobic bigots but it's okay if you do the same thing...

 

Mate, it’s the hypocrisy…

People on this thread are falling over themselves to provide Cawthorn with some cover for his behaviour. Let’s not insult both our intelligences by ignoring the reality that, if this had been a young Democratic politician, there would have been howls of condemnation…..

 

Even Christ didn't tolerate blatant hypocrisy.

 

Oh really…? Please point out any homophobic slurs I’ve made towards Cawthorn…?

 

~ The truth ... people are jealous.


'' If Democrats are mad they can't date me they can just say that instead of projecting their sexual frustrations onto my boyfriend's feet. ''​

 

Are you not trying to shame him?

If you are not, at least your Lefty comrade who posted it is trying to

 

That's why he could never be a Democrat.

Okay, in all fairness he would not be a republican either... But he sure as hell would not be a Democrat.

Are you going to step up to that challenge I mentioned you in and the other thread?

I mean, you like his post after all.

 

That was one of my favorite semesters!

 

No, it was softcore, which neither of us had been exposed to, in a theater with 350 other students or so, French with English dubs and for some reason we found that hilarious, and we all laughed, I mean seriously, the French noises of love-making are pretty much the same in English, we really didn't need the dubs! BAHAHAHAHAHA!

So we all laughed, the very serious professor did his speal at the end of each class about the "deeper meaning" of it all, which we all found to be even funnier, so a great time was had by all. My wife (now) and I still laugh about it. I did find the lack of gun play a little disappointing. French porn, English dub, and a cutie with a gun? Would have been even better!

​

 

I'm not sure that there is any do you have any recording of him saying that Ben shouldn't wear lingerie or have a drink once in awhile?

I'm not so sure about that being condemned for wearing lingerie or having a drink?

 

Only for his (and his colleagues’) hypocrisy mate….the twerp can wear whatever drag outfit he chooses. The pathetic thing is that poor Madison wouldn’t even see the hypocrisy…he isn’t very bright…

 

Didn’t mention a “Ben”…?? Anyway, the hypocrisy is writ large. He is a member of a party which is obsessed lately with uncovering “perverts” and “groomers” and who regularly attack the “gay agenda”. He also claims in his bio to be a committed Christian…is he unaware of the passages condemning men who dress as women..? To be clear…I don’t care. He can do whatever he pleases, as long as it doesn’t involve me or mine. It’s entirely about the hypocritical stance…

So, you are going to insult both our intelligences…?

 

Not a degradation of culture. A study of culture. A culture that you might believe is already degraded.

There are a lot of sociological issues that could be studied.

 

I do apologize that was an error I meant to say men

first this doesn't have to do with perverts groomers or the gay agenda.

Second he's not dressing like a woman if he is he's failing miserably because even without knowing who he was I could tell he was a man.

Wearing women's clothing doesn't mean you're dressing like a woman.

yeah I get you're trying to call out some hypocrisy but you're failing to point it out.

You tried to make this about perverts and the gay agenda and it's rather homophobic for you to assume gay men crossdress. Many straight men crossdress in many gay men don't. So there's absolutely no hypocrisy there other than the stereotype you are placing on gay people. And we all know the Bible verse is about fooling people into believing you're the opposite sex and that's not what he was doing.

Seems you beat me to the punch.

 

Don't oppress him. We support his right, as a man, to wear lingerie if he wants to!

​

 

And so do I…….his much-touted Bible on the other hand……

 

Does the bible have a problem with men wearing lingerie? Maybe you have a special translation? Are you sure you aren't oppressing him for wearing lingerie? I hope not, because that wouldn't cool. Or maybe the leather cover on the bible is something that you find to be kind of hot? Not my gig, but, no judgment. We're the big tent. As long as you respect the rights of others, and love guns, everyone is welcome.

 

The Supreme Court has said it cannot define "pornography". How is it defined in this course?