Washington’s enemy ‘doesn’t exist’

Hamas' Charter ought to be changed.

 

Palestine isn't a country and Israel acted in self defense in direct response to Islamic Imperialist aggression against all of those people in every instance any assertion is a flat lie.

 

The nation of Palestine is recognized by the global majority and most of the nations of the world. Followers of Israel need to reject the nation of Palestine because it conflicts with their racist illegal settlement expansion plans.

 

And that consists of a majority of tyrannical dictatorships so woopedy (*)(*)(*)(*). Palestine is not now nor has it ever been a state.

Palestine isn't a state because it's people are bent on the extermination of world Jewry just like the Nazi's whom they idolize.

 

Well technically speaking its a dormant nation. It exists as a country, it just isnt recognized internationally, yet.

LOL Well aside from the fact there is currently no such thing as
"Islamic Imperialist aggression", Israel did in many instances act in self defence before the middle of the 20 century. However 1967 marked the beginning of a staunch revival of old school Zionist aggression. From that point onward it has been overwhelming a conflict headed by the state of Israel.

 

Sorry mate, you've worn that one out. Calling people liars doesn't change the fact. Israel was and is a belligerent aggressor, in both actions and rhetoric.

 

Actually, the nation of Palestine is inhabited by Semites who are generally hated by Israeli racists, as your position demonstrates.

 

We are on the same side, that is to say, we have a common enemy - that being the Zion Nazi regime that presently persecutes the people of Palestine, and contaminates the US politic into a state of perpetual conflict.

Later this evening, I will be revealing the three faces of Israel.

As written by an Israeli Jew.

It should make for interesting reading.

Jack

 

Which races are you talking about??

So, when Israel complains about rockets from Gaza landing in schools you call that aggressive rhetoric?

You do know that Israel could kill every person in Gaza and many squatting on the West Bank if they had the morals that you claim they have??

 

No your laughable assertions that direct responses to illegal closings of the Straights of Tihran (a direct act of war) and hundreds of Fedayeen attacks conducted by agents of the Egyptian government could constitute an offensive war on the part of Israel is what has been warn out.

 

Semite is a linguistic classification not a race, which race are you referring to exactly? There certainly is no Palestinian race anymore than there is a Palestinian nation. What there are are a group of Arabs living on disputed territory which they never owned who are bent on the extermination of world Jewry as evidenced by whom they actions at the ballot box.

 

It is neither a state, nation, or country it is a territory and a disputed one at that.

Tell that to the non-Muslims currently being Arabized and ethnically cleansed from Egypt to Pakistan.

BS, the war of 1967 was in direct response to the closing of the Straights of Tiran which was a flagrant act of war on the part of Egypt not to mention the hundreds upon hundreds of attacks conducted by the Egyptian trained, armed, and directed Fedayeen.

Name an instance and I will refute your propaganda with the facts of direct Arab attacks upon Israel to which the IDF only responded too.

 

Followers of Israel are showing that the US of AIPAC is serving the needs of racism, extremism and anti-Semitism and their frequent smears of racist hostility against hated Semites do not prove otherwise.

Such Holocaust misuse and abuse is boring and designed to fool gullible Americans. Nuclear Israel is fine and needs to recognize and accept the nation of Palestine, as requested by the global community.

 

No it is a country, it just isnt a recognized one.

coun·try/ˈkəntrē/
Noun:

1. A nation with its own government, occupying a particular territory.
2. The people of a nation.

By definition, Palestine is a country.

What about the ones that aren't being Arabized (they aren't Arabic?) or ethnically cleansed in Egypt or Pakistan?

Wrong again my friend. The UN emergency meeting on this proves the point. No one considered Israel hadn't started the war, the only dispute was whether it had shared responsibility with its neighbors or was entirely to blame. Consequently the entire international community requested Israel return to its previous borders.

LOL That wouldnt be a refutation, that would be a nonsequitur. You dont defend the innocence of Israel by proving the guilt of Arabs on another situation. That makes no sense. But since you ask, why not continue with 67? That was the beginning of Israel's complete aggression. It war with Egypt marked decisively the fact Israel preferred expansion over defence in 1971.

 

*Yawns*.

Do you really think people fall for this lie?

Btw, and a word to the wise.

Is that really you in your avatar?

Lovely picture, but a word to the wise.

I knew someone that used their pic on an internet forum.

They were to regret doing.

Just trying to be helpful.

Take care,

Jack