No one said it does but your not going to get pregnant without it. Perhaps you haven't. Speak for yourself.
Yes, dodges all you got left? What was the purpose of the activity that created the pregnancy she now has?
What activity is the woman, along with the man you know that heterosexual thing, engaged in, what was it's purpose if it wasn't to get pregnant, would you say having an orgasm?
Then why does she get to kill the human being created because she wanted an orgasm? What's more important the orgasm or the human life?
Most humans are programmed to seek and react to an orgasm. It's basic biology. It's not basic biology to abstain.
She doesn't "get to kill the human being created because she wanted ana orgasm". She gets to kill her fetus because it's her body and she has the right to bodily autonomy.... As much as you dwell on women's orgasms they have nothing to do with their rights..
Yes I know people like to have orgasms does that trump the life of a human being it creates? Which is more important?
Yes she gets to kill the human being it created, why does her right to the orgasm trump that right of that life?
SHE cannot kill the fetus. She requires someone else to do that. There is no right to receive an abortion.
What TF does that have to do with the topic or your views on the topic??? Why are you so obsessed with something having so little to do with anything??? ???? It looks like you'll do anything just to make some kind of "point" whether it has meaning or not...and you still failed
FoxHastings said: ↑ She gets to kill her fetus because it's her body and she has the right to bodily autonomy.... Yes, she can and even if she has someone else do it you have no point as usual. That was in response to my : "As much as you dwell on women's orgasms they have nothing to do with their rights.."" No where in that sentence did I say there is a right to abortion ...however, there is a right to bodily autonomy which everyone has and it covers abortion...
So does that mean you also want to ban having bowel movements too? Feces contains "human life" too, or are you not aware of the billions of bacteria that live in your gut? It's personhood that is the issue here, not human life.
ROFLMAO no feces do not contain a human life..... These arguments are getting stupider by the day, aren't they?
Yeah, right "doctor". Get back to us when you learn a little bit about biology. It's tempting to think of feces as simply the used-up remains of the food you ate — the stuff that makes it through after digestion. In reality, this stuff is present, but 50 to 80 percent of your poop (excluding water) is actually bacteria that had been living in your intestines and was then ejected as food passed through. Many of the bacteria in poop are still alive, but some are dead — carcasses of species that bloomed as they fed on the indigestible plant matter you consumed, then died shortly afterward. ... The other 25% of faeces is made up of solids, which are mainly organic (relating to living matter) materials. A small proportion of solids is made up of inorganic material such as calcium and iron phosphate as well as dried constituents of digestive juices. Around 25-54% of the organic material is made up of microbes (dead and living), such as bacteria and viruses.
