I can and I have. Multiple times now. Clearly you are just either to slow to get it or are justbpretending as if you did not hear it yet because you lack the arguments to address it. I will put it for you one last time, but very shortly this time; a newborn is an individual -- it is physically individuated from its mother (i.e. an individual) and an actual baby. Only individuals have rights and rights only pertain to the actual.
Oh yeah, sorry. My mistake. Yes, you have indeed said that total nonsense in that past. What I should have said was, you have not been able to stand by and defend that nonsense when placed under scrutiny by me. You do pretty well going back and forth with me, but at a certain point you just give up. You go silent and no longer reply. Let's give you another go shall we? Let's see how you do this time. Firstly, what makes someone "physically individuated?"
From another poster:Vocabulary word of the day: Eristic (adjective) given to disputation for its own sake and often employing specious arguments (noun) a person who disputes; who enjoys controversy (especially if specious)"""" OK, chris, I know you can't answer my question but this silly post of yours doesn't hide that fact. This is a discussion forum and anyone can address any post. Yes, I know your reply will be "what question? "...but that'll just be another DODGE because you have no answer...
And YOU haven't gone silent? Yes, you have .... I ask an inconvenient question and YOU go silent and no longer reply. ....and you have NOT proven that poster wrong in any way...maybe in your mind but not in fact. ...and "gone silent" ? What? He is replying to you for all to see so what you say is false....see post5026...
What makes it nonsense? Quite the contrary - I go silent because you never adress my arguments with anything but "muh nonsense" and then jump to another point pretending I did not adress it already. What do you mean? The answer is reality... Don't you know what physically individuated means?
Well there is no clear cut definition. Google certainly doesn't know much about it. If you were confident in your definition of it, you would have already provided it!
especially when you get those INCONVENIENT questions LOL, quite a childish post but that is usually all you have anyway.... I bet you feel better (relieved) now that you dodged that Really Inconvenient Question....
You seem to think that I have dodged a question but that you have NOT! I don't think I have, but at the very least we have BOTH dodged a question.
LOL, anything but the topic and an answer ..... I have not said I have not dodged a question but now you want to make it about that instead of answering the question YOU have dodged...and that is a dodge Don't feel bad, no other AntiChoicer could ever answer that question either, proving that to them it is all and only about punishing women for having consensual sex ... Thank you for helping me prove that once again...
LOL, anything but the topic and an answer ..... I have not said I have not dodged a question but now you want to make it about that instead of answering the question YOU have dodged...and that is a dodge Don't feel bad, no other AntiChoicer could ever answer that question either, proving that to them it is all and only about punishing women for having consensual sex ... Thank you for helping me prove that once again... I see you HAVE to stay off topic ....thanks for admitting you dodged that INCONVENIENT question. (Now try the topic if you can )
Learn to use Google (or a dictionairy) then. physically /ˈfɪzɪkli/ adverb adverb: physically [...] in a way that involves bodily contact or activity. Google "psyically synonyms": bodily Now.. individuate /ˌɪndɪˈvɪdʒʊeɪt/ verb distinguish from others of the same kind; single out. "it is easy to individuate and enumerate the significant elements") Now put the two together and figure it out. It really is nothing else but normal usage of the language and not a made-up term or very complicated at all.
When I asked you: "what makes someone "physically individuated?" - that was my attempt at getting you to put it in your own words. Just like you once asked me to define "natural rights", asking me to put it in my own words: You also asked me to: Did you not have access to a dictionary in 2021?
Ok, so then we both acknowledge that we MAY have dodged a question! We have something in common for once! I have admitted no such thing! The topic? I have been talking about the topic (abortion) this whole time!
Because it literally lives inside and of the pregnant womanäs (note: not mother) body. Duuuuuuuuuuuuh.
That does not mean that it cannot be "distinguished from others of the same kind." Different DNA = distinguishable.
No, you've been making excuses to avoid answering my question I asked you about abortion. Here's just some of your posts with no mention of abortion : 5028,5031,5034,5037,5040, 5042... All those opportunities to step up and answer my question and you couldn't Don't feel bad, no other AntiChoicer could ever answer that question either, proving that to them it is all and only about punishing women for having consensual sex ... Thank you for helping me prove that once again...
