What is 'objective reality'?

Discussion in 'Religion & Philosophy' started by Incorporeal, Jun 27, 2014.

  1. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,819
    Likes Received:
    18,296
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't know about all of that.

    He just seems to be a theist and I presume you are atheist, (my apologies if I am mistaken). But just because you may believe (or not believe) in a different thing, doesn't mean we have to be enemies.
     
  2. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I am AGNOSTIC....and I have no issue of any person of any Religion....as long as they are not shooting at me or trying to sell me...pardon me...get a donation...for some Religious Books early in the morning at my front door!!!

    I don't care what sexual preference a person has...don't care what skin color or race orwhether they like to fly kites!!!

    I DON'T CARE!!!!

    What I care about is REALITY!

    Because I live in it...and it is a B!#@H!

    AboveAlpha
     
  3. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,819
    Likes Received:
    18,296
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Okay, I don't care for door to door things myself.
     
  4. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What does going door to door have to do with defining 'objective reality'?
     
  5. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    79,135
    Likes Received:
    19,982
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    duh, a door is objectively real.
     
  6. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Not after you have analyzed it and have come to a conclusion regarding its status. Your analysis and conclusion are subjective.
     
  7. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Until you walk into one or have one slammed into your face!!!! LOL!!!

    My definition of REAL.....If it physically effects me....it is REAL.

    AboveAlpha
     
  8. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Well, that is good to know, because you don't place any restrictions on the source of the object that effects your physically. Therefore, as long as there is a physical effect, you are not concerned with the source of that effect. Hello book of Psalms.... Hello to the Greater and Lesser Keys of Solomon.
     
  9. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Notice the words....if IT......IT being defined by the Scientific Method.

    AboveAlpha
     
  10. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    yes, I noticed the word "it" being used twice. However, the 'scientific method' is not a physical thing, but a process that involves physical things... at best, the scientific method is a concept. Now, because it is a concept, it cannot be real, but rather a subjective thing/practice.
     
  11. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    By your logic the BELIEF IN A GOD is a not a PHYSICAL THING but a concept thus cannot be real!

    That is what YOUR idea of Logic is saying.

    Try to stick to irritating members with rhetoric.

    AboveAlpha
     
  12. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You finally realized what I have been saying all along. I have repeatedly told you and others that God is not Physical but rather Spiritual. I must say,,, it took you long enough to realize what I have been saying. Try paying more attention to what I write, and it might not take so long in the future to realize what I am saying.
     
  13. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Simply PROVE IT.

    AboveAlpha
     
  14. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I am not an advocate of the scientific method, therefore the onus of proving the scientific method is not upon me.
     
  15. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    LOL!!!!!

    You realize that you are using the Scientific Method....RIGHT NOW...or at least when you replied to me....in order to LOGICALLY FORMULATE A REPLY!!!

    The Scientific Method is simply a Method to properly apply LOGIC and thus is sort of a CHECK LIST in order to figure out things or Reality.

    Every Theologen uses the SCIENTIFIC METHOD....in a manner to best understand their Religious Text or Bible or Koran or Torah...etc.

    Example....LINK....http://catholic-resources.org/ChurchDocs/PBC_Interp-FullText.htm

    Baptists, Protestants...etc....use the SCIENTIFIC METHOD and use this method in all their theological research of the Bible in order to better understand some of it's meanings.

    AboveAlpha
     
  16. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    79,135
    Likes Received:
    19,982
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No. Wrong again. Nouns are objectively real.
     
  17. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Well that is noble of you to ascribe such a prestigious trait upon my being. However, there are likely to be some on this forum who would disagree with you in regard to my techniques of presenting argument on this forum.

    Then you admit that 'things' constitute 'reality'? That is great. www.tfd.com/thing
    "hing (th[​IMG]ng)n.1. An entity, an idea, or a quality perceived, known, or thought to have its own existence."




    Can you show PROOF of that claim?

    Again, can you show PROOF of that claim?
     
  18. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Then "God" is objectively real. Very good.
     
  19. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Objectively definition....adverb

    Using facts and not personally influenced by beliefs.

    Thus....since the existence of a GOD or GOD'S has not nor cannot be proven to be REAL....

    It is a false statement that a GOD is Objectively Real.

    The BIG BANG is OBJECTIVELY REAL.....WHY?

    BECAUSE WE HAVE EVIDENCE....TANGIBLE, PHYSICAL AND MATHEMATICAL EVIDENCE!!

    As far as a GOD......NUTTHIN!

    Hey...I WISH this was not so...but it is....we have absolutely ZERO EVIDENCE that a GOD exists or is real.

    AboveAlpha
     
  20. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48


    You see that "n" at the end of the pronunciation key? It means "noun"... therefore, the term 'god' meets the requirements established by dairyair... it is a noun and as dairyair stipulated "all nouns are objectively real".
    Take your argument up with the one who made the claim regarding the status of 'nouns'.
    "god (g[​IMG]d)n.1. God
    a.
    A being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions.
    b. The force, effect, or a manifestation or aspect of this being.

    2. A being of supernatural powers or attributes, believed in and worshiped by a people, especially a male deity thought to control some part of nature or reality.
    3. An image of a supernatural being; an idol.
    4. One that is worshiped, idealized, or followed: Money was their god."
     
  21. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    GOD......definition

    1. Something made up or not by people who have no clue.

    2. Possibly existing something or somewhat...somehow...maybe....but no existing proof it exists.

    3. Something people pray to when afraid of dying or facing REALITY.

    4. Supposed Loving Entity that although to all evidence to the contrary...such evidence being starving, dying and diseased newborns....innocent 1 to 10 year olds butchered....laid to waste.....BUT HEY!!

    IT'S ALL A PART OF GODS PLAN RIGHT!!???

    If there is a GOD we need to FIRE IT'S ASS and get in a Temp. to do a better job until the possition can be filled by properly EVOLVED HUMANS!!

    AboveAlpha
     
  22. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    really? What is the source of your definition? My source (in relevant part) was www.tfd.com/god .

     
  23. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    LOL!!!!

    That is like using a Priest or Minister as a source to prove a specific Gospel was not made up!!! LOL!!!

    Actually....it is like a person who is highly addicted to a drug coming up to their dealer and asking the Dealer..."Hey....is it GOOD?"

    Now....what do you think the Drug Dealer is going to say in his reply to his customer?

    Would he say..."No!! IT'S TERRIBLE!! DON'T BUY IT FROM ME IT SUCKS!! LOL!!!

    OF COURSE NOT!!!

    Religion is the DRUG!

    Priests, Ministers, Pastors, Preachers, Imans, Rabbi's.....they are the PUSHERS....THE DRUG DEALERS!

    The praying and confessing of sin's or asking for forgiveness brings the euphoria of absolution WHICH IS THE DRUGS HIGH!!!

    Withdrawl is when a person does not go to worship for awhile and by coincidence things go badly in their lives so they confuse action/reaction and Causality to WRATH OF GOD.....that is WITHDRAWL.

    And when a person actually dies and either that is it or perhaps something does go on....and if something does go on and that would have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH MANSIONS IN THE SKY as the issues and wants of the body would have no need for a possible existing Consciousness or Soul....THAT IS THE CRASH!

    AboveAlpha
     
  24. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Seemingly then your addiction if an aversion from 'truth'. In this particular case, the truth of the definition of the term "god". Your refusal to provide an intelligent answer as opposed to a rationalization is evidence that your presentation of a definition was a definition of your own private interpretation and not one that has been socially accepted by those who publish dictionaries.

     
  25. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Again...for what seems the Millionth Time.....a TRUTH is SUBJECTIVE!!!

    I have no issue if people wish to believe in a TRUTH.

    I do have an issue when people try to state a TRUTH is a FACT or REALITY as it is NOT.

    If it was...it would no longer be a TRUTH but rather a FACT...as a fact is not subjective.

    AboveAlpha
     

Share This Page