When noob truthers embarrass themselves, unseen debunkers emerge from everywhere

Who says it's missing? You?

Show any report that states such. There are reports of the debris and removal. There are reports of the found DNA, yet you ignore those. Why is that?

 

You haven't even clicked the link yet, drone.

 

You don't know if I have looked at your "blog" or what,
anyhow your assertion that you have 100 points of evidence....
right .... I'll tell you this, I've not seen any compelling evidence
that "FLT77" or for that matter any of the 4 flights existed at all!

Note that 9/11/2001 is the most poorly documented disaster in history!
& WHY?

Personally, I ( if I were the Judge in this case ) would label all that has been presented so far, as INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE to prosecute a case against any Arabs. 9/11/2001 = FALSE FLAG ATTACK.

 

Evidently you go through life with your eyes closed then.

 

Just a bit of a complaint about the data on your blog,
I notice that you have some airshow video to illustrate
the point that large airliners can indeed fly fast at low altitude,
exactly what airshow was this, ( makes a difference if it was Denver or Orlando ) and where is it documented that the airliner(s) in the video so much as exceeded 400 mph at that altitude?

 

Are you serious? I linked this page with over 3,000 gigabytes of information, documents, real world air traffic and military recordings, raw radar data, thousands of pages of documents and interviews, and you say "most poorly documented disaster"?

Unreal. If you honestly believe that, then it is obvious that you have not gone looking for these documents yourself. You sir are a waste of time. I will no longer bother with you.

 

WELL ....... I guess I've been told!
however, the question of the airshow video alleging that airliners can fly "real fast" at low altitude still lacks the actual speed of the aircraft to complete the INFO on this. anybody have any INFORMATION?
or?

 

`It may come as a surprise to President Obama, but he has actually proved that when it comes to foreign policy and the war on terrorism, President George W. Bush and America have been right all along. `

http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/09/14/obama-just-proved-bush-was-right-all-along

************************************
`Not only has obama turned all our friends to the point they no longer trust us, so lets all thank the democrats and obama administration for the entire mess they made and that someone else will have to clean up because no one trusts obama anymore...`

`Its amazing that the ignorant leftist still point fingers (blame) and work so hard to "differ" from the "real issues" going on `presently`...and to this day and still support and defend `o`s.....Failure....`

 

This whole thing is really NOT a "left" vs "right" contest,
its about what is good for AMERICA and really the Donkey & Elephant have been in bed together for at least the past century.
Retire them both, put them both out to pasture and lets all think outside the box.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaG4w-VUXtc

Just a bit of food for thought ..... Bon Appétit

 

Nature abhors a vacuum. What do you suggest it be replaced with and how do you plan to implement it?

 

That sounds like fringe claptrap. The first clue is assuming left and right automatically equal the two major parties. Maybe this is an American problem, but left politics doesn't automatically mean uncritical support of the Democratic party. The same is true for conservatives who may or may not be Republicans. But it's a common theme of fringe right Libertarians when they try to sell their crazy to the unsuspecting, because what Party hasn't had it's scandals? Then they offer a "savior" like Ron Paul.

The whole thing is really a sleazy political bait and switch contest.

 

In 1992 when Ross Perot ran, he pulled votes in the teens of the % of the total electorate and that scared the crap out of the Donkey & Elephant!
What if the "fringe parties" all together pulled maybe a third of the vote in any given election, this would make a statement that the public is fed up with the dirty politics as usual from the two major parties who make no secret of hogging the spotlight at the expense of all other parties.

Why is it that other nations have multiple parties ( that is at least half dozen of them) and AMERICA is stuck with a choice between Tweedledee & Tweedledum? or?

If we want REAL change, AMERICA is going to have to do it from the ground up, our politicians are NOT going to fix it for us, to expect change without effort is like asking for crops without plowing!

 

Leaving aside the fact America does have more than two parties, this is not a bad question. You must mean the viable parties, and it is true there are only two of those. The answer probably lies in a combination of lax regulation of political donations and inertia.

I don't think anyone expects change without effort. However it is perfectly reasonable to expect elected public servants to do their jobs. There are mechanisms to remove them if they don't.

Did you vote for Ron Paul?

 

Its a secret ballot so I could say I voted for J.C. and what difference would it make?

 

Yes, you could say a lot of senseless and untrue things since no one actually knows who you are. Nonetheless, that doesn't keep you posting other senseless and untrue things.

If you'd rather not answer, you can just say so. But your posts and political persective almost perfectly overlap with someone in sympathy with Ron Paul brand of objectivist libertarianism.

 

Some of what I believe parallels RON PAUL
however I am not a member of the Ron Paul fan club!
Just as with some of what I KNOW on the subject of 9/11/2001
parallels AE911TRUTH, however I am NOT a member of the
Richard Gage fan club. ...... does that shed light upon what is up here?

 

So you didn't vote for Ron Paul. You could have just said so. ;/

 

If the American ballot had a "none of the above" block, I'd use it.

 

Tolerance of different opinions is the key.