White nationalists aim to take over tiny North Dakota town >>>MOD ALERT<<<

The prosecution had no case against Zimmerman. They failed to prove anything, besides having Obama, Holder, and Al Sharpton on their side. Get over it.

That's not true. Affirmative Action is legalized racism and discrimination.

 

Henry Ford and Harry Truman didn't fail in life. Neither did James Watson. I guess every white person who lived before the 1960's was a failure?

This whole argument of yours is silly. PC cultural Marxism is an ideology that hasn't even been mainstream for 50 years. For most of the country's history a spade was called a spade. You assume that just because whites aren't joining Nationalist groups, and are not as open with their views on race, they aren't racist, and would be willing to live in black/Hispanic neighborhoods. The high concentration of wealthy whites in New England is fairly compelling evidence that there are still many whites in this country who would rather live amongst their own kind, and would resist "diversity" efforts to turn their neighborhoods into ghettos.

Here's the real hypocrisy, though: you argue that racist whites are failures who "need somebody to blame", yet you don't apply the same standard to blacks. Are black racists failures who need somebody to blame? Considering how often they blame whitey for all their problems (and backed up by white left-wing progressives), I'm interested in hearing the answer.

 

1) Where is the crime?

2) Where is justifcation for this 'SPLC' to make such a mental fuss over something so trivial(and no crimes being committed).

3) Did the gentleman in the OP steal the other houses? Bulldoze them after stealing them? Or did he buy them? If it's the last one, again, what is the problem?

4) How much does it cost to run the SPLC annually?

5) Where do they get their budget from?

 

You right if you were in denial and I have gotten over it, its not as if its the first time I have seen it.

Yea another one of those myths that folks like you keep repeating and hopefully someone will believe it.

 

Not really sure what your point is?

Not even sure where you get the notion of 'supremacy'. Define supremacist then prove that the man in the OP fits that lazy term.

I am pretty sure you would find that there are not many Bangladeshi and other third world immigrants living among the rich, what do you think?

You equate rich with good/better? Who the hell would want to live among the twisted freaks of Holyweird? They fit your millionaire model. They are a mess. Drug addicts, adulterers, and the biggest problem in Holyweird... paedophilia.

I also see no evidence of how the man in the OP is a 'failure'. He managed to buy all those properties, did he not? Is that really a sign of 'failure'? Not seeing where he 'blames' anyone.

But apart from ALL of that - well done.

 

What a lot of utter garbage.

Seriously.

Zimmerman wasn't even WHITE.

He was multi racial. The day that blacks stop wallowing in this crap will be a giant step forward for them, rather than keeping them enslaved to such truly sad notions.

- - - Updated - - -

What a lot of utter garbage.

Seriously.

Zimmerman wasn't even WHITE.

He was multi racial. The day that blacks stop wallowing in this crap will be a giant step forward for them, rather than keeping them enslaved to such truly sad notions.

 

How can you call it a "ideological talking point" when you had not even heard of it, just two hours ago?

 

Oh that justifies it, he wasn't white.

Again the mindset of the sheetwearer rears its ugly head.

 

You need to stop making stuff up.

Quote where I said anything was 'justified'?

I am just pointing out that it wasn't racially motivated, and that you can't blame whitey for everything.

I've even heard blacks themselves say that people with your position merely hold them back as people.

- - - Updated - - -

What is a sheet wearer?

And what is that mindset?

 

Had Trayvon been white Zimmerman would have never profiled him so it was freakin racially motivated. BTW Zimmerman's dad is 100% white.

And your point? There were black folks who called Dr. King a troublemaker and a agitator, so I feel in good company.

Think for a minute it will come to you.

 

Isn't it funny how the left claims to have compassion for the poor, yet they never miss an opportunity to trash "blue collar types" as "failures"? The contempt they have for white working class people is that this demographic is unlikely to vote for Democrat politicians. That's really where it comes from. White progressives never trash poor blacks, Hispanics, or any other voting bloc. Those are the people they shed crocodile tears over in their appeals to raise taxes to redistribute wealth. Poor, innocent victims who would surely go on to become NASA engineers if it wasn't for those evil white racists at the top.

 

That's just tin foil hat paranoia.

Zimmerman was not white.

Martin was not white.

Whatever else this was, it was not racially motivated.

And as far as I can make out, whitey must have been among the officers that made an arrest, right? Whitey must have been among the officers the charged him, right? And how about the entire jury? Were they all 'crackers' and 'sheet wearers' as well, and it was ALL a conspiracy to get the black man?

Self pitying arguments like this are never going to help black people.

Tommy Sotomayor speaks well. Perhaps you should listen to what some of what he says.

[video=youtube;F-cTLUCIMpo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpag e&v=F-cTLUCIMpo[/video]

 

Not the first time you've seen justice when someone who committed no crime did not go to jail? Good. The system must work.

Affirmative action isn't a myth. It discriminates against people based on race, and gives preferential treatment to others based on race. And you're in support of it.

 

I am asking you outright.

Why?

Because I believe that in using 'sheet wearer' you are attacking my race, the white race.

And there are rules against that on here, as you would be SCWEAMING about if someone used 'spear chucker'.

But let me guess... double standards.

 

How many black people are in the United States? Hundreds of millions? Are you making the argument that every black person who has a job got it because of affirmative action? Do you know how asinine that sounds?

But because you like to report anyone who proves your argument invalid, I will just leave you to your delusions and wish you well.

 

Excellent point.

But no surprise with the self hating whites. They have been brainwashed to self hate since birth. Which is then augmented by BS Holywood and cultural Marxism.

They often try to pass themselves off as peaceful as well, yet are often the most aggressive and violent.

Don't forget that other thread though.

Remember?

When they called this 'pushback'..



[video=youtube;qIUIUqPYbng]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qIUIUqPYbng[/video]

 

It's okay for blacks on here to call whites 'sheet wearers'.

It's okay for blacks and self hating whites to arrogantly dismiss that disgusting hate crime (see previous vid) as 'pushback'.

It's okay for whites to be called 'crackers'.

It's okay to take pot shots at a man for being a security guard. Honest work. What's wrong with it? Better that than car jack two kids for a living.

It's okay for homosexuals to pour hate daily on hetrosexuals that don't meekly go along with whatever they say.

It's fine for Jews to call whites 'Nazi's', and 'German officers', and 'Islamonazis', and a wealth of other things.

How can we PROVE it is fine? By simply reading it, day in and day out.

We (on the other hand), are forced to sit in silence and take this.

We HAVE to tolerate it.

If we try to defend ourselves, the cultural marxism that that exists on forums (ironically manifests). Dare a white non Jew try to defend himself against ALL of that..he is penalised. Right away.

Here's some 'sheet wearing crackers' speaking in a far right newspaper.

The Guardian: Racial murders: nearly half the victims are white

Home Office release official figures as police claim that political correctness is stifling the debate

The figures also overturn the assumption that almost all racial murders are committed against ethnic minority victims.Senior police officers have admitted that 'political correctness’ and the fear of discussing the issue have meant that race crime against white people goes under-reported. One chief constable has claimed that white, working-class men are more alienated than the Muslim community.

Peter Fahy, the Chief Constable of Cheshire and a spokesman on race issues for the Association of Chief Police Officers, said it was a fact that it was harder to get the media interested where murder victims were young white men.'The political correctness and reluctance to discuss these things absolutely does play a factor’, he said. 'A lot of police officers and other professions feel almost the best thing to do is try and avoid it for fear of being criticised. We probably have all got ourselves into a bit of state about this.

'The difficulty in the police service is that the whole thing is being closed down because we are all afraid of discussing any of it in case we say the wrong thing - and that is not healthy.'These latest official figures give the most complete picture of racially motivated murders in the UK, revealing the situation to be much more complex.

'There are a lot of young white working-class lads, particularly on the more difficult estates, who are hugely alienated. Yet very little attention is given to that’

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/oct/22/ukcrime.race

 

Sheet wearer refers to the KKK, because they wore sheets when they met. There was a choice whether or not you wanted to be a member of the Klan. The only way for someone to call you that were if you made some comments or suggestions that sounded racist.

Spear chucker is a derogatory term for black people. I really have no idea why someone would call a person that, unless that person knows the individual is black and wanted to insult them.

 

And why would a black man say this to a white man in Northern Europe?

It's clearly an attack against ALL of the white race, much as it would be if we stated that all blacks were tribal people that lived in mud huts.

The fact you have to create a difference (rather than just saying both are wrong), is telling of your agenda.

 

Edit/Unnecessary comment

OK. I'll spell this out for you. You don't calculate how any Whites have been discriminated against by counting how many Blacks have done anything. You calculate it by how many Whites have there been in the workforce (over the course of 50 years), or attempted to be in it, since AA began, and by simply noting that they ALL have been discriminated against. Now since, of the total US population (2010 Census) there are 72.4% Whites in America adding up to over 223 million people, we can say there are hundreds of millions of Whites being discriminated against right now, just by the existence of Affirmative Action. Adding to that, many millions more, because of the constant turnover in population (young White people entering the job force, replacing older whites leaving) we have far more, total Whites having worked in the workforce over that 50 year period than are there now. Hundreds of millions.

Get it ?

 

You don't have to wear a white sheet to have the same ideology as the Klan. You don't have to be from America to have the same beliefs as the Klan.

Basically, what I'm getting at is, one is a choice (you can choose not to say or act racist). The other has no choice (you cannot help being black)

You can be a white person and never say or act racist, so more chances or not you will never be called "sheet wearer". On the flip side, what does a black person have to do to be called a "Spear chucker"... Just be black?

Did I say one was right? Just because you don't agree with the explanation, does not mean it is any less valid.

 

I could be wrong but weren't the criminals who committed this crime prosecuted and sentenced for the crime they committed or did a jury of all black folks find them innocent.

 

Okay.

But you best now go prove I have the same "ideology as the Klan", beyond all possible doubt, else it would be just as fair to say that you don't have to be African to embrace the ideology of viscous black tribalists.

The thing is you cannot do so, for I do not do so.

So.

On that basis, please keep your emotions in check and tell me....

Where is the crime being committed in the OP?

- - - Updated - - -

I fear you somewhat missed the point and not for the first time.

 

First you need to remove Hispanics from your metric of 72.4% (since white nationalists love to complain about the Hispanic factor skewing their numbers when taking about crime), then remove white women. What are you left with?

 

Yeah really. Sometimes. And I gave you one example. So what's the matter ? Are you not up to speed on the case, and unaware of the Miami-Dade school police coverup that took place regarding Trayvon's Martin's (and lots of other Black kids) crimes ?

http://theconservativetreehouse.com...ckpack-with-stolen-jewelry-and-burglary-tool/