Who poisoned our culture and sexualised our children?

I had best ad the caveats first. I am not saying that erotic has never existed in one form or another. It has. However, there can be no doubt AT ALL that our culture has become one big cesspit of sexual promiscuity, the related disease and unwanted pregnancy that brings, there can be no doubt that we now live in an age when every possible sexual perversion is not only protected by law, but promoted on our screens, and taught in our schools.

There is no doubt whatsoever, that in an age when females were supposedly 'liberated' (they were conned), that never before have they been as sexualised and presented as pieces of meat, as they are today.

And this is not merely limited to the porn industry itself.

It has gone mainstream. Once upon a time you would need to have gone out of your way to see degrading imagery of women, and other sexual perversions. Today? Today, it is in our advertising, it is in our mainstream magazines and press, it is on the screens of mainsteam tv.

I absolutely assure you of two things.

1) This is no accident.

2) This is destroying your society from the inside out.

Abortions, children born to casual sexual encounters, huge numbers of STI's and STD's, rapes, never ending child molestation, pro paedophile groups gaining political status, Jack Straw making it illegal for childen in care to complain about being raped, and just this week, our hard working politicians revealed to have accessed porn tens of thousands of times, while supposely working for OUR country, at Parliment.

There is even talk of altering the term paedophile to 'minor attracted adult'.

We have one of the key voices of the so called LGBT movement saying that 'not all sex with children is harmful', while being lorded around by the liberal elite(Peter Tatchell)

A man that (for some reason) who feels a need to live behind a steel door, three inches thick.

And what of America?

Time was that if a typical film from the US had any interaction between men and women, there was always a really healthy and loving theme to it. At most it was slightly erotic.

Today?

Today, vile imagery and the sexualisation of children is everywhere in the US.


One day groups like NAMBLA will be protected groups, and those that speak against them will go to prison.

Today in the US, you need not look far for the ugliest possible torture porn. All you need do is watch the latest Eli Roth films, and you can see all the vile filth you want.

I said it was no accident.

It did not suddenly happen overnight.

Now, if I am right, it would beg the fair question - Who did it? And also why?

Let us go on a journey of education..

**


A story little told is that of Jews in Hollywood’s seedier cousin, the adult film industry. Perhaps we’d prefer to pretend that the ‘triple-exthnics’ didn’t exist, but there’s no getting away from the fact that secular Jews have played (and still continue to play) a disproportionate role throughout the adult film industry in America. Jewish involvement in pornography has a long history in the United States, as Jews have helped to transform a fringe subculture into what has become a primary constituent of Americana. These are the ‘true blue Jews’.

Smut peddlers

Jewish activity in the porn industry divides into two (sometimes overlapping) groups: pornographers and performers. Though Jews make up only two per cent of the American population, they have been prominent in pornography. Many erotica dealers in the book trade between 1890 and 1940 were immigrant Jews of German origin. According to Jay A. Gertzman, author of Bookleggers and Smuthounds:The Trade in Erotica, 1920-1940 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999), ‘Jews were prominent in the distribution of gallantiana [fiction on erotic themes and books of dirty jokes and ballads], avant-garde sexually explicit novels, sex pulps, sexology, and flagitious materials’.

In the postwar era, America’s most notorious pornographer was Reuben Sturman, the ‘Walt Disney of Porn’. According to the US Department of Justice, throughout the 1970s Sturman controlled most of the pornography circulating in the country. Born in 1924, Sturman grew up in Cleveland’s East Side. Initially, he sold comics and magazines, but when he realized sex magazines produced twenty times the revenue of comic books, he moved exclusively into porn, eventually producing his own titles and setting up retail stores. By the end of the 1960s, Sturman ranked at the top of adult magazine distributors and by the mid-70s he owned over 200 adult bookstores. Sturman also introduced updated versions of the traditional peepshow booth (typically a dark room with a small colour TV on which the viewer can view X-rated videos). It was said that Sturman did not simply control the adult-entertainment industry; he was the industry. Eventually he was convicted of tax evasion and other crimes and died, disgraced, in prison in 1997. His son, David, continued running the family business.


The contemporary incarnation of Sturman is 43-year-old Jewish Clevelander Steven Hirsch, who has been described as ‘the Donald Trump of porno’. The link between the two is Steve’s father, Fred, who was a stockbroker-cum-lieutenant to Sturman. Today Hirsch runs the Vivid Entertainment Group, which has been called the Microsoft of the porn world, the top producer of ‘adult’ films in the US. His specialty was to import mainstream marketing techniques into the porn business. Indeed, Vivid parallels the Hollywood studio system of the 1930s and 1940s, particularly in its exclusive contracts to porn stars who are hired and moulded by Hirsch. Vivid was the subject of a behind-the-scenes reality TV show recently broadcast on Channel 4.



Is there a deeper reason, beyond the mere financial, as to why Jews in particular have become involved in porn? There is surely an element of rebellion in Jewish X-rated involvement. Its very taboo and forbidden nature serves to make it attractive. As I written in these pages before, treyf signifies ‘the whole world of forbidden sexuality, the sexuality of the goyim, and there all the delights are imagined to lie . . .’ (‘Reel Kashrut: Jewish food in film’, JQ 189 [Spring 2003]).


According to one anonymous industry insider quoted by E. Michael Jones in the magazine Culture Wars (May 2003), ‘the leading male performers through the 1980s came from secular Jewish upbringings and the females from Roman Catholic day schools’. The standard porn scenario became as a result a Jewish fantasy of schtupping the Catholic shiksa.


Extending the subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. Some porn stars viewed themselves as frontline fighters in the spiritual battle between Christian America and secular humanism. According to Ford, Jewish X-rated actors often brag about their ‘joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies to the puritanical beast’. Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion.

Astyr remembers having ‘to run or fight for it in grammar school because I was a Jew. It could very well be that part of my porn career is an "up yours" to these people’. Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw, said (on lukeford.net ), ‘The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.’ Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged. Porn is no longer of the ‘what the Butler saw’ voyeuristic type; instead, it is driven to new extremes of portrayal that stretch the boundaries of the porn aesthetic. As new sexual positions are portrayed, the desire to shock (as well as entertain) seems clear.


Nathan Abrams


is a Lecturer in Modern American History at the University of Aberdeen. He has just completed a book on neo-conservatism in the United States.


http://www.jewishquarterly.org/issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38

 

So what you are saying is blame the gays and the Jews. I just don't understand why people care about what other people do and why they keep blaming the same small groups for all of society's perceived ills.

 

Lets get one thing straight jack, the jewish ppl you mention are EUROPEANS who have at one time or another converted to judaism in order to defame Israel. The link you are looking for is not real, it is EUROPE. Without no demand there is no supply.

 

From a truth speaker.

IMO - It would be dishonest of anyone to refuse seeing the
validity of what Mr Abrams (not stormfront or other so-called "Jew-hating site ) have said .

..

 

Did not take long for someone to come along with 'what you're saying'.....

What I said is moot.

Read the article and the quotes.

I did not say them.

I provided information about them.



- - - Updated - - -

In what possible way do those two lines have ANYTHING to do with the information in the OP?

 

Nathan Abrams is a Lecturer in Modern American History at the University of Aberdeen. He has just completed a book on neo-conservatism in the United States.

 

Out of interest, who was the founder and creator of 'Neo Conservatism'....

 

He is a European and he gives an honest appraisal of how corrupt Europeans are.

 

Except what he was speaking about in the OP was Jews and their motives for corrupting America.

Stay on topic for goodness sake.

 

The need to state the jewishness of such peddlers negates the fact that after all, we are talking about converts to judaism and not real jews, ithought that needed to be pointed out before you go on a tirade about Jews. Moving on...

- - - Updated - - -

They are not Jews Jack, you dont even know what one is having always declined an invitation to explain such.

 

Negates what 'fact'?

What on earth are you on about?

Read the item.

Take it in.

Comment on a specific part OF THE ITEM.

Quote something from it and offer a clear rebuttal.

Do.. something!

 

I dunno


But wiki says :

Neoconservatism is an intellectual movement born in the 1960s inside the monthly review Commentary.

Commentary is the journal of the American Jewish Committee, which replaced the Contemporary Jewish Record in 1945.[1][2] On the "theoretical" side of neoconservatism, most influential neoconservatives such as Norman Podhoretz and his son John, Irving Kristol and his son William, Donald Kagan, Paul Wolfowitz, and Abram Schulsky, refer explicitly to the ideas in the philosophy of Leo Strauss.[3] They often describe themselves as "Straussians



Two conservatives, Stefan Halper and Jonathan Clarke, in their 2004 book, “America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order,[4]" provided a succinct introduction to neoconservatism at that time.

It all sounds Jewish to me , WOT ?

..

 

That these people mentioned are not Jews but Europeans. Europeans are not Jews, they are Afro-Asiatic. Therefore you need to point the finger at your own ppl, Europeans. Man up.

 

European names, German, Polish, Balkan, these are not Jews, they are Khazars.

 

Please tell us what/who in your opinion is a "real Jew" ?

Take your time and please try being patient and carefully explain it to those of us who haven't a clue what is meant by a "realJew" as it seems Jews in general amongst them selves disagree on what a "real Jew" is .


.....

 

Its not my opinion, it's Yah's. Read Deuteronomy, it states in there the characteristics of the Jews and how to identify them.

 

Absolutely so, and for sure it is.

True American conservatism did not suit Jewry. Why? Well, for one thing, true American conservatives tended to be non interventionist. This clearly does not suit Jewry, as you are well aware. For another thing, true American conservatives (as quaint as it may sound), wanted to put America first. And Americans. Again, this is no good to Jewry, who want 'Israel first'.

Thirdly, true American conservatives would ALWAYS have been champions of sensible border control and immigration policy. Not so the Neo Cons, who LOVE unrelenting and damaging open border and lax immigration into America.

 

Okay, this is what you are getting at.

Khazars.

If only you had said in a clear and concise manner.

It is a fact that it was not just the nobility of that region the (for political reasons), converted to Judaism. It was mass conversion, I agree. It is a fact that they then fanned out all over E Europe, and beyond. I am willing to accept those things as having some truth.

But the fact of the matters is that in the eyes of Judaism, Jews, Israel, and the entire world, despite what you may say about Khazarian origin being true, they are seen as Jews.

It would be impossible to separate them all out.

 

Perhaps so, However , they claim and there are even posters on this forum , who recognize and endorsed them as being JEWS ,

Go ask any Jew /half/quarter-Jew here whether those named are Jews or Khazars and you'll get my meaning.

IN fact there are many, in the pro-Israel camp here who vehemently deny any Khazar connections.

(wink)

 

http://thoughtmaybe.com/the-century-of-the-self/

 

Indeed.

Besides, I do not wish to make this about 'Khazars'.

Let us listen to a Rabbinical perspective of what they think of non Jews.

In THEIR OWN WORDS.

[video=youtube;b2-h6Gam57o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpag e&v=b2-h6Gam57o[/video]

 

We keep blaming the same small group because the same group is responsible for just about every bad thing in society today. Our raped economies, low birthrates, sick cultural values - all trace their roots back to the jew.

 

Judaism is just like the other Abrahamic religions, all corrupted.
They are only seen as Jews because that is what YOU want to see, if that is not what you want to see then look through anothers perspective ie mine and look through another perspective and another etc.

It is not impossible to separate, we have the Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth to guide us.

 

Listen.

You go tell some Jews they are not Jews.

Get back to me with their answers.

Now.

Can we please return to the actual OP?

- - - Updated - - -

Well it COULD be that it is the same common denominator, over, and over, and over and over and over and over.

Or it could all be a rambling coincidence, and it 'just so happens' that Jews keep popping up that way.

 

Of course there is, that is a part of the mass deception headed by the European elite, began with the italian renaissance and the trans atlantic so-called trade in the 15th century in earnest.