Who poisoned our culture and sexualised our children?

\

My point was clearly that most do not need to be "Schooled", and that perhaps an education might be of benefit to one who sees sex with non human creatures as something worth discussion.....as it indicates some measure of fixation.

 

I merely note the fact you seem to wish to focus on animal sex in a discussion about human sexuality.....and wonder why?

 

Which is? That Jews have poisoned the American culture? Again, so what? Just them? That, again, is why I posted the religion of those that decided Roe v. Wade. Not a Jew among them.

If Jews are telling people they are, every last man jack among them, perfect, then there would be a point to this article. Otherwise, it is just screaming, "all Jews are not perfect!!!" to which, a reasonable response should be, duh.

Am I missing something?

 

Those who continually petition the courts to remove Judeo-Christian philosophy from the public square under the false interpretation of separation of church and State. They use the courts to make and change law because they know that the majority of Americans would never vote for removing Judeo-Christian philosophy and its basic morals and values that are an intregal part of American society.

 

Nothing strange at all here, and only a 'hater' like me would even mention it.

***
Did you know that this man (Jack Straw), in the year 2009, made it ILLEGAL for any Child to complain about abuse while in the care system ?

Want actual proof?

Not a problem.

Sunday 15 February 2009

"But as of April, because of a change in legislation being introduced by Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, the media will no longer be able to identify those involved in cases such as the Websters. It will also be illegal for any children currently in care to speak out, even if they feel they are being maltreated....."


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/m...s-from-telling-their-own-stories-1622154.html

 

I see...so the separation clause need not be adhered to?

Ever wonder why non Christians decide to fight back?

 

Nothing abnormal here. Only a 'hater' would possibly object or even have cause to mention it..


**

Did you know?

Between 1978 and 1982, Harriet Harman was employed as the Legal Officer for the National Council for Civil Liberties which later became Liberty.

At the time the National Council for Civil Liberties was officially affiliated to two organisations, the Paedophile Information Exchange and the Paedophile Action for Liberation, whose members argued openly for the abolition of the age of consent.

When Harriet Harman first entered politics this matter was brought up, but a friendly media and other politicians accepted her claims that the NCCL no longer had any connection with P.I.E./P.A.L. when she was Legal Officer between 1978 and 1982 . However it later transpired that P.I.E./P.A.L. had been officially affiliated with the NCCL until 1982, when Harman left and P.I.E./P.A.L. went underground.

She has since repeatedly veered between denying any connection with P.I.E. and P.A.L., and claiming that as a Legal Officer for the NCCL she had no choice in who she represented".

As with a lot of liars Harman has different versions of events for different audiences.
Let’s look at the first lie that she was never connected or in contact with P.I.E. or P.A.L. in any way:

Documents now in the Public Domain show a NCCL letter signed by Harriet Harman objecting in the strongest terms to any laws against child pornography, unless it could be proved by the prosecution that the child was harmed.

The NCCL also submitted a response to the Government arguing for lowering the age of consent and stating “ Childhood sexual experiences , willingly engaged in , with an adult result in no identifiable damage.” When the Government moved to crack down on child pornography , the NCCL’s response, again signed by Harriet Harman , claimed the new law could lead to “ absurd prosecutions and increased censorship”. As Legal Officer for the NCCL she also argued to abolish incest laws.

- - - Updated - - -

Name some names?

 

Probably because you said you had 'no problem with it'.

Funny that.

- - - Updated - - -

Evidently.

 

Watch this clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6OI_Ia5Qdg

Two of our inventions are working against us, television and movies (visual media), and a thirth invention is callled politics, it advances from a poisoned society.

 

At last.

 

If your wishes were to come true in this matter of Zionism, what would the headlines read tomorrow?

I'm trying to get an idea of what exactly you want to happen.

 

You're missing the point entirely. Yes, people don't want this filth pushed into our culture. But you were presenting this as an example of our culture being poisoned. Um, no. By all means, to extend the analogy, this is our immune system working perfectly. The actually problematic things (the sexualization of children, for example) is quickly denoted and eliminated to the best of our ability. I don't see how this is evidence of the harm of an oversexualized society, when said society is so quickly able to see the problems in its midst.

 

I challenge you to provide ANY indication I did as you suggest....and strait call you a liar.


Please shoe my confusion or error in this statement.

 

Would you say that Jack Straw (whose brother has a sex conviction), making it illegal for children in care homes to report being abused, is an example of something dark and sinister?

- - - Updated - - -

My apologies.

I got you mixed up with another person who did say this(word for word)..

"This is probably why the idea of someone porking a horse really doesn't bother me that much -"

 

So do you blame all Anglicans for this?

 

You miss the point.

Again.

Keep trying though.

 

no you blame all jews for the actions of a few. You do it all the time. So the question is relevant.....sorry you don't read your own posts.

 

Did this all start back in the 50's with the Wolfenden Report? Remembering the girls on Bayswater Road rounded up and forced to trade their wares indoors.

 

First I've heard of it. I personally wouldn't draw any connection between this and his brother, but I would say that something is clearly not kosher. What does this have to do with the sexualization of society? Also, any comment on the fact that abortion, rape, and teen pregnancy are all at record lows and have been trending down for a while now and what this has to do with your theory? Maybe some sort of societal trend that would back up your base hypothesis, rather than individual anecdotes which are to analyzing societal trends what Burzynski's anecdotes are to cancer science?

 

The separation clause is ALREADY being adhered to.

 

Who poisoned our culture and sexualised our children?

Nature.

 

I'm not familiar with this?

- - - Updated - - -

It is the opposite.

- - - Updated - - -

Like what?

And why?

 

Which is? Because unless you have a really good explanation, this is exactly what I'm warning people that it is: an effort to mindlessly spread hatred.

 

It seems likely that making it so that children can't legally complain about their situation would make it harder for abusive households to come under criticism.

 

Just a few items you might read to get an understanding of today's screwed up sexuality:


Wolfenden and beyond: the remaking of homosexual history, by ...
www.historyandpolicy.org/papers/policy-paper-51.html
Today it has one of the most liberal and tolerant. That is not the result of the Wolfenden report, ... The report made a dramatic impact on publication, ...
... erroneous assessment of his sexual nature, he would get away. Today, ... its deterrent effect the law can save a

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~​

COMMONWEALTH LAW BULLETIN LESSONS FROM WOLFENDEN …
www.hirschfeld-eddy-stiftung.de/fileadmin/...learningfromwolfenden.pdf · PDF file
paedophilia. Sexual attraction to under-age children is no more common ... read again the Wolfenden report, fifty years after it was written. We