Why do 'pro lifers' only care about life inside the womb?

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Jack Napier, Jan 13, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Archer0915

    Archer0915 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,412
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    0
    one more then I stop this fish (Subdermal) is cooked.
    If over 1,000,000 babies is not significant then you have issues and there were people starving and this lead to the infant mortality rate. I think I did say I saw some estimates close to 2% but doing the math I think it lies close to ~5%. You do the math.

    Here you go:

     
  2. Subdermal

    Subdermal Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    12,185
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I saw your claim of a million babies - and I reject it.
     
  3. Archer0915

    Archer0915 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,412
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah you are right a million in 2-3 years. Lets see and the depression was how many years? and what about other deaths that can be attributed to this? The mothers mortality rate probably went up as well. Want me to investigate that as well? Hey how about suicides and sickness?

    You have rejected because you are blind and see what you will. You called me and rightly so and I upped the ante with things you can not just dismiss. Bury your head and walk away with some dignity while you still can. Or prove me wrong. I am a man and I have grown out of my childish ways.

    Gee this is a good reason for population control and I prefer personal responsibility and abstention. We can not have that though.

    But you go ahead and reject it okay.
     
  4. Subdermal

    Subdermal Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    12,185
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your evidence is insufficient, and your cites are absolutely uncredible. You have already been refuted.

    The Great Depression was a machinated event. If it were not for FED and Central Banker action, the damage that was done would not have been nearly as severe, or long-lasting.

    Every picture you or anyone has offered of people during the Great Depression were people who did not look emaciated. The claim is flatly rejected.
     
  5. Archer0915

    Archer0915 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,412
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So if I present radical data you dismiss and if I present government data you dismiss and even Princeton research is rejected. You even reject your own citations. Wow big FAIL for you then. When I am wrong I accept it because that is life but you are mighty and need nothing so you can reject whatever you choose.

    Well I am done with you. Hell reiver is more fun than you.

    Go live in your fantasy and I will not reply any more to you on this matter because you are a waste of time.
     
  6. Makedde

    Makedde New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    66,166
    Likes Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This thread is way past its 50 page limit and will now be closed.

    Feel free to start a Part 2 if you wish.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page