Why do Zionist apologists demand special debating privileges?

So as to keep this thread relatively clean, I will create a separate thread for this on the Middle East board.

 

So the first thing you have to do in this case, is to go to a Turkish Sauna and spend some time with masseurs, and washers of everykind that would work on any part of your body until you are absolutely clean 'BODY AND SOUL' then start whatever turns you on... Can't wait for this... Ah take the ignoramuses lot with you... you will not stand a chance otherwise... Palestine existed your LEFT FOOT MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://v4.netlogstatic.com/v6.00/3864//s/i/smilies/big/clap_anim.gif


http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/laughing-smiley-face.gif

 

This poster has just been shown that the PLO made no attacks across the Lebanese border in 1982 contrary to the repetitious Zionist mantra, plus he was then shown that the attempted assassination in London on the Israeli ambassador was not done by the PLO. So POOOOFFFF went the Zionist Myth that "Israel does not initiate;Israel retaliates." It cannot be substantiated in the real world based on real historical facts; verifiable referenced facts that is.

So the response is a recourse to a rant about Spaniards (who have not been involved anywhere in the debate).

With that the OP continues even further reinforced.

But fear not. In a few days, weeks or months, he will return claiming full victory on the topic that Israel's invasion of Lebanon was fully justified and was simply a retaliation to attacks against it. Weird the debating flexibility that they demand; isn't it?

 

The above is BULL, BOVINE, BULLOCK, BALONEY, BANTER, BASE, BLEAK, BISCUIT, BIZARRE and BUFFOONISH...

YES what happened in Lebanon WAS FULLY JUSTIFIED, otherwise I would not have been here to redress your scatological posts... Jews are not anymore the Jews of the inquisition, the Jews of Europe to the gas chambers, the submissive Jews in the mind of some illiterate Muslims and some believers in chimeras... The Jews of today are proud and victorious, take that to the bank!!!

 

YAWN

http://www.politicalforum.com/middl...982-zionists-deny-guilt-3.html#post1061938244

 

I forgot another designation... INFANTILE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

See what I meant when I posted the OP?
I rest my case.

 

And to further confirm the OP, here we were asked by Slyhunter to believe that a hot-air Zionist bluster can carry the day against unrefuted and verified historical facts:

http://www.politicalforum.com/middl...eally-want-peace-israel-2.html#post1062057263

Slyhunter at his 'best' Many thanks for that classic example.

 

You are excused! Your case has been resting since you joined here.

 

For sure and for truth, Marlowe.
Now watch, there will be posts about Islam now.

 

Klipkap,
Whether the pro-Zionist crowd realizes it or not, their very posts prove what you stated about the lack of refuting what has been presented.

 

Why do Zionist apologists demand special debating privileges?

Because they are the Master Race, obviously.

 

indeed!

 

excellent post.well said.

 

Come and pat my shoulder too... You do not seem to be even handed... so in response let me state the following.



A FEW POINTERS IN RELATION TO THE UNITED NATIONS

The readers at large make it appear as if the United Nations has EVER supported Israel after November 29, 1947, and that, therefore, as if Israel OWES its member-nations something in return.

The UN ignored the May/June 1967 crisis, in which Nasser, as head of the Egypt-Syria United Arab Republic, challenged Israel to war by blockading its shipping.

The UN (U-Thant), in mid-May '67, released its unit, which served in the Sinai post as a buffer between Egypt and Israel, in effect signaling an "all clear" to Nasser.

The UN, to this day, has found no way to allow Israel to serve on its Security Council.

In 1967, Syria lost the Golan as a member of the aggressor U.A.R. Alliance. In 1973, after attacking and making some gains initially, Syria lost this territory yet once more. (One has to remember that part of the Golan Heights of today were "Part & Parcel" of the territory of the Mandate before 1923.)

Keeping the fruits of aggression?

Israel fought these two wars against Syria as the aggrieved party - not the aggressor nation, as Arab revised history evidently notes.

In 1948/49, Israel had to fight the armies of several Arab nations to secure its U.N.-approved independence - also with the vaunted UN membership standing by.

The Golan is Israeli until another agreement supersedes the cease-fire with Syria - namely a negotiated Peace Pact as is now being attempted.

Any referendum law passed by the Knesset will hold, as did the Golan's annexation by the Begin government back in 1981 - its so-called 'legality' notwithstanding, ESPECIALLY not concerning anything the UN has to say.

Today after the voting of the so called 'Palestine' as an OBSERVER STATE is the continuation of the UN duplicitous behavior 65 years later...
Again the General Assembly vote carries no weight!

 

Come and pat my shoulder too... You do not seem to be even handed... so in response let me state the following.



A FEW POINTERS IN RELATION TO THE UNITED NATIONS

The readers at large make it appear as if the United Nations has EVER supported Israel after November 29, 1947, and that, therefore, as if Israel OWES its member-nations something in return.

The UN ignored the May/June 1967 crisis, in which Nasser, as head of the Egypt-Syria United Arab Republic, challenged Israel to war by blockading its shipping.

The UN (U-Thant), in mid-May '67, released its unit, which served in the Sinai post as a buffer between Egypt and Israel, in effect signaling an "all clear" to Nasser.

The UN, to this day, has found no way to allow Israel to serve on its Security Council.

In 1967, Syria lost the Golan as a member of the aggressor U.A.R. Alliance. In 1973, after attacking and making some gains initially, Syria lost this territory yet once more. (One has to remember that part of the Golan Heights of today were "Part & Parcel" of the territory of the Mandate before 1923.)

Keeping the fruits of aggression?

Israel fought these two wars against Syria as the aggrieved party - not the aggressor nation, as Arab revised history evidently notes.

In 1948/49, Israel had to fight the armies of several Arab nations to secure its U.N.-approved independence - also with the vaunted UN membership standing by.

The Golan is Israeli until another agreement supersedes the cease-fire with Syria - namely a negotiated Peace Pact as is now being attempted.

Any referendum law passed by the Knesset will hold, as did the Golan's annexation by the Begin government back in 1981 - its so-called 'legality' notwithstanding, ESPECIALLY not concerning anything the UN has to say.

Today after the voting of the so called 'Palestine' as an OBSERVER STATE is the continuation of the UN duplicitous behavior 65 years later...
Again the General Assembly vote carries no weight!

 

Come on Bendor, a conspiracy nut (appropriately named '9/11 was an inside job') agrees with KK. I'd be worried if he ever agreed with you.

Congrats to KlipK though, he is in good company, who can possibly better validate the veracity of Islamofascist claims than people believing that the CIA blew up the WTC LOL

 

Why do Zionist apologists demand special debating privileges?


Because they really have no excuse for their Supremacist behavior.


The Jewish religion excuses lying or any form of treachery as long as it is aimed at outsiders.

http://rense.com/general45/kol.htm

You see this tactic used by them on this forum and elsewhere.

They insult you. When you respond they run like tattle tales and report you in an effort to get you banned.

Everything is about them. It is about getting what they want and to hell with everyone else.

Sure, people in general have a tendency towards selfishness. But how many of them make a religion of it?
Most of the world recognizes self centered behavior as a character deficit. At least they try to avoid being that way.


Judaism embraces the use of deceit in the pursuit of Mammon as a way of life. And they call recognition of their intentions "anti-semitism". As long as some Goy putz is willing to fall for this schtick they will continue to use it.

 

Ah, more ' bogus allegations of anti-Semitism intended to silence criticism '. Fodder for fools.

 

Thank you for describing yourself and the Arabs to a 'T'... run along now...

 

so very true.well said. best post on this thread.

 

All you have to do friend is just give us documented evidence from the State Department or any other well known source...

But you won't! I will tell you why... there is no such a thing... and the most charming episode is that you know about it!!!!

 

nice dodge,thanks for proving the truth scares you and you only see what you WANT to see.time for you to cry because I wont give you the pat on the shoulder that you arrogantly and childishly want.according to you frady cat deniars,its all just one bizarre conicidence that after 9/11 our freedoms and libertys were taken away from us with the patriots act that some senators even regretted signing when they found out about what it actually said later on and was never given the chance to fully look at allowing the government allowed to imprison us without a trial and no lawyer and indefenitly detain us and illegally spy on us and give us TAS body scans violating our human rights.all just a bizaare
coincidence in your funny little denial minds.

again,nice dodge there,thanks for showing your too arrogant to admit when your wrong cause the truth scares you.

 

amen to that bro,just look at the latest dodge by them.hee hee.

 

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??????? Your response is incoherent... are you OK? What is 'frady cat deniars'??? Where is the evidentiary proof... it is true that this is a free forum but the above is unbelievably silly.