Why Does Hillary Clinton Always Wear Pants?

Compared to dresses, women look stronger and more independent in pants.

 

Wrong on all accounts. I admitted from the start I didn't like Hillary and I considered her unattractive. So do most people. There are two issues here, so simple that even a liberal could understand. The first is her relative unattractiveness. Even in the grandmotherly roles she can't make the pantsuit thing work. We, as a society really like our spokespeople to occupy a specific role, one that is defined in great part by appearance. That's why leading ladies and models look good. Do you see Tom Brady with Lena Dunham? Hillary could go neck and neck with Lena in the ugly department. The second thing is her health issues and is she using pants to hide what might be the obvious to a medical professional. Historically, the Clintons have been far less than transparent in dealing with the public.

 

Agree, but there are 4 threads about conservatives' appearance to every one on the left. Hypocrisy much?

 

I made the mistake of scrolling down to the pic of hillary in a 1 piece....bad idea. You need to put a warning up before posting a pic like that

 

She most likely suffers from libedema. She might end up looking like jabba the hut, and the fat around her legs and thighs is painful.
http://fatdisorders.org/fat-disorders/lipedema-lipoedema-description

She probably lounges around in a mu-mu at home.

 

"I don't know but I been told a big leg woman ain't got no soul".....Led Zeppelin was right!

 

Well then Givenchy, you know this just how? Lady Thatcher didn't wear pants. Even Golda Meir, hardly a beautiful woman, but a high competent one wore dresses. But lets compare her role as first lady to that of say, Nicholas Sarkozy's wife, Carla Bruni. They were about the same age at the time of their husband's time as president of their respective countries. Which one would like to be trapped on a desert island with? With Carla wouldn't even come up for air. Hillary would live on the other end.

 

I'd rather have Trump's hair than Hillary's cankles.

- - - Updated - - -

Her Thighness.

Sometimes it's hard to believe Bill's claim that Hillary got more pu--y in college than he did.

 

If you can find one where "I" referenced one's appearance as being relevant material for debate, I'll send you a video of me eating my hat.

 

Women are very insecure about their looks. Years ago I used to date a woman with cankles and she never wore a dress until I asked her to because I think it looks more feminine. But even then she wore black hose to help cover her legs. Insecure as hell.

Steve

 

It matters more to the republicans that value things like this over substance. Never mind Trumps horrible comb over, cruz's rat face, or rubio looking like he just competed in a 4th grade spelling bee.

 

There was no problem with Repubs when Trump denigrated several women including Fiorino. When your candidate looks like Trump , you really shouldn't mention looks, he is quite the most repulsive man I have ever seen....but HE bothers me, not his looks.

 

A. Do you judge all your political candidates on the shape of their legs? If you do , that would be quite ignorant.

B. How convenient for your tunnel vision that you haven't noticed that most political candidates are wearing pants!

Most members of congress are wearing pants.....did you want to see their legs ???


C. Most men in politics wear a PANTS SUIT everyday of their lives.........why are you so sexist ???

- - - Updated - - -

You must remember that Repubs seem to judge women on their looks ...and their breeding ability, like livestock...

 

Your problem is, you never mentioned health in your OP. That's on you. This is nothing more than a hate thread for you, while using certain physical features to vent that hate.That's really all it is. Creating this kind of thread about "anyone", is like creating a thread about handicapped people, calling them ugly and making fun of their disability. A person who feels the need to do something like this deserves being labeled one of the lowest bottom feeders imaginable.

 

There's a difference between quality and quantity. Besides money says Hillary's paramours were more like Lena Dunham.

 

There was also no problem with Hillary denigrating the women Bill raped was there. BTW how was what Trump said about Rosie not true?

 

BS. Most men don't wear skirts unless they're confused liberals.

 

Well, if you don't/can't address my post keep up the ignorant sexism.....

Want to try again or are you too frightened?

"""""""""""A. Do you judge all your political candidates on the shape of their legs? If you do , that would be quite ignorant.

B. How convenient for your tunnel vision that you haven't noticed that most political candidates are wearing pants!

Most members of congress are wearing pants.....did you want to see their legs ???


C. Most men in politics wear a PANTS SUIT everyday of their lives.........why are you so sexist ???

- - - Updated - - -



You must remember that Repubs seem to judge women on their looks ...and their breeding ability, like livestock...""""""


That post goes UNaddressed ...:

 

I'm not in the habit of repeating myself. The answer is the same. Most men don't wear skirts unless they're confused liberals. As well as being sexist? Hmmm. Guilty as charged. I'd rather look at Fox News girl than a dried up old prune like Judy Woodruff. Most normal men would too. Goofy liberal stances like feminism don't change mother nature.
As far as Hillary is concerned about the only thing she's changed with the Chairman Mao suits is to add a little bit of color. She still doesn't do much for them.

 

So you can't answer my questions. Funny how you can't see your own blatant sexism....or the fact that we're discussing politicians, not News "girls" (sexist, they are women)

Here, try again:

A. Do you judge all your political candidates on the shape of their legs? Why not??? If you do , that would be quite ignorant.

B. How convenient for your tunnel vision that you haven't noticed that most political candidates are wearing pants!

Most members of congress are wearing pants.....did you want to see their legs ???


C. Most men in politics wear a PANTS SUIT everyday of their lives.........why are you so sexist ???

 

Then I suggest you get some reading comprehension. Because you're a bit slow on the uptake I was nice enough to repeat myself once. BTW I'll call Fox news girls or any woman anything I want whenever I want. I could care less what you think is sexist. I've called them darling, honey, sweetie or just about anything I could think of. Most of the liked it and those that didn't could kiss my you know what.

However the thread is really about why does Hillary wear pants all the time? If you have some input into this why not just write your opinion. It could be health reasons. Or it could be that she has fat ugly legs and feels this is the best way to hide them. It's such a simple question that even a liberal could render an opinion.

 

Oh, so you have a leg fetish....

and you believe that " no woman may run for office without having her legs approved by you""....

....why didn't you say this was supposed to be a silly joke in your OP....it certainly looks that way....


...and I doubt any woman on earth cares what you call her ...but what you call her says a lot about you, not her....

 

SHOW ME THE LAW that says female political candidates must wear dresses.

 

I believe Hillary wears pants suits because of not only her ugly legs, but also because of her propensity to lesbianism.

 

Oh my! Gasp!....you actually think only lesbians wear pants!!! OMG! What century do you live in?!

Did you know women don't wear corsets anymore?? Or hooped skirts? But hey, judging a political candidate on the shape of their legs says it all ...and none of it good....


Maybe YOU can SHOW ME THE LAW that says female political candidates must wear dresses.