Why Does Hillary Clinton Always Wear Pants?

Why don't we see Donald in shorts... I mean what are you expecting to see?

 

Perhaps https://www.google.com/search?q=var...X&ved=0ahUKEwjd9q2P5_nKAhVDQSYKHcZyAPEQsAQIRA.
I never paid much attention to her dress attire..as i never gave a S#$t...but does that help?

 

I think some of these posters have a Really Weird Need to see under Hillary's clothes ....

...you'd think they'd want to check out their own candidates, like Trump, because those old guys need their prostates checked....

 

They help hide the cloven hooves and snake scales.

 

Maybe you do. Most of us have already said that's she fugly. But still no answer from you. Is her continued use of Chairman Mao colorful pant suits cosmetic or is she hiding health issues? Hell at this point, a simple yes or no answer would suffice.

 

Funny how you don't even realize that you clearly reveal that you have no clue about real issues and have to attack Hillary's legs .....

I'll leave you to your dreams about seeing Hillary's legs ............

 

"Why Does Hillary Clinton Always Wear Pants?"

a better question is why do some people want to see Hillary without pants?

.

 

Typical. A liberal that won't answer the basic question. She's ugly to be sure, besides becoming an almost comical figure in her Chairman Mao outfits.

 

An even better question is why Hillary has obviously been coached for body language, yet is not capable of wearing clothes that might help her win an election. We all know that Palin got a bit of a boost from being so porkalicious. We know that Obama had more than a few wet panties to deal with ala obamagirl. JFK didn't try to dress down for the occasion. He won because he looked better than Nixon.

She knows that if she had a bit of cleavage to show, it would help her in the polls, just as she knows that waving to a crowd of people she doesn't know helps.

So why does she wear chairman mao clothes? Even Donald Trump knows that he's got to wear a garish red tie to appeal to a particularly dumb section of the audience, and the other more intelligent set understands why he wears that ridiculous tie so he is forgiven.

So what's up with her inability to dress for success?

 

did GW have a Bush Girl

Mr Clinton I think we all know had a few

.

 

Your "logic" leaves a lot to be desired.

 

Dubya had a ton of people who wanted to have a beer with him. Hell, I'd love to sit down with him and get wasted before going bar-hopping. The guy was funny, could take a joke, and seemed to take the country a lot more seriously than he took himself.

What is Hillary's claim to this "I'm just a normal person like you" claim to fame?

I just think there's something weird with the pantsuits that she refuses to give up. They are as fashionable as granny panties, and not even her supporters would want to sit down with her for... a power brunch?

Just a question to ponder. At the end of the day, politicians do what they can do to get elected, and nobody is going to vote for Hillary because she's a fashionista. So she has to work on some other things to get people to vote for her.

And so far, I have yet to hear one reason to vote for her. Hell, if she wanted to build a wall between canada and the united states, then I could understand her. As it is, nobody knows what she will do if she managed to become president. Maybe order another pantsuit?

This isn't much to get excited about.

 

Why Does Hillary Clinton Always Wear Pants?

Mebbe so's Slick Willie won't sneak up behind her...

... an' play hide the salamie.

 

neither party has any candidates that scream out to me, so I will just vote straight democrat this year

 

Has this year been any different from any other years?

After all, you've got a fair bit of divergance going on. You've got hillary who is in the pocket of big money interests, and Sanders who... well, he's all about giving whoever votes for him whatever they want. And the the republican side, you've got a few like Jeb that are hillary in suits rather than pantsuits, and then there's Trump...

Vote for a democrat sight unseen? That's not really unexpected from a statist. You know that whoever the democrat nominee is, they'll be in the pocket of big money. Not a bad deal for fascists. but what about some of the pressing problems that you might want to see addressed?

 

we have a seat in the SC up for grabs, that is the most important issue of the election

that should be enough to get out the vote for anyone that wasn't planning to vote this election

.

 

No we don't. It'll wait until the next president gets elected.

In the meantime, Mccain didn't fare too well when his medicals were made available, and I'm guessing Hillary isn't going to fare much better.

 

confused, the next election is when the next President gets elected?

.

 

And then we can look at who the next president nominates, and deal with that then. But that's not now.

We always know that a president is important when it comes time to nominate SCOTUS judges. But right now, that's not important because it's going to wait until there's another President.

 

agreed, but if you want a liberal judge you vote democrat... common sense, that is the very point of waiting, to let the voters decide

which makes the next election even more important and EVERYONE should vote

.

 

And republicans need to vote for a conservative president because Scalia was the man.

sigh... this really does make the notion of voting for constitutional principles important. Scalia saw the constitution as dead, whereas the left thinks it can be changed, like Twain's huckleberry Finn can be changed, without changing the text, to mean something completely different from what Twain meant.

This is what they want. Not change the text of huckleberry finn, but to change what Twain meant when he was writing it, which just grinds my gears!!!!! These.... "people" who call themselves humans will stop at nothing to get what they want.

 

so you mean women should not be able to vote, slavery allowed, ect....?

.

 

You're not electing her for her brains or there wouldn't be an eMail scandal or four dead Americans in Benghazi.

 

Typical. Repubs judge women based on their looks , and hate them if they aren't good looking.

....and have no knowledge or comprehension of issues so HAVE to attack her looks..........and OBSSESS ON IT ...WEIRD!



And what's this basic question you need answered.......I answered all your questions and you just don't like the answers.



...I don't think you like the fact that women wear what they damn please

 

As do you posts.......but that's a good cop out......

Please do show YOUR "logic" by insisting that women who wear pants are lesbians......or lesbians never wear dresses.......

OR women are required by law to wear dresses so men can judge their worth through the shape of their legs and determine if they are lesbians or not ...


DUHHHHHHHHHHH