Ronstar, et al, And again, you make a "prima facie" case based on the single reading of the law. (REFERENCE) See Post #27: USA: "settlements are illegitimate" (COMMENT) You cannot selectively enforce bits and pieces of the law. You have to look at the entirety of the situation. I am not saying that the Palestinian is wrong. In some cases, they may have a very valid cause of action; both on civil matters (International Court of Justice stuff) and that of a criminal nature (International Criminal Court stuff). What I am saying, this that there are non-violent methodologies involved, military exigencies, and security countermeasures to evaluate and prioritize; relative to a proper and coherent judgment. What you are doing here is spot sensationalization, not making a point that is both sound and valid (in which your premise is true but you conclusion is based on imperfectand incomplete knowledge). There is much much more to evaluate and consider than just these two citations in isolation. Most Respectfully, R
And the answer is.................. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14TH | 11 KISLEV 5774 Israeli Minister Erdan ‘Astounded’ by Kerry Remarks NOVEMBER 14, 2013 11:20 AM 8 COMMENTS Author:Zach Pontz Israeli Minister Gilad Erdan. Photo: Maxine Dovere. Israel’s Home Front Defense and Communications Minister Gilad Erdan struck back at John Kerry Thursday, further highlighting the widening gap between the U.S. and Israel when it comes to nuclear talks with Iran. Erdan told an audience at a security conference in Tel Aviv that he was “astounded” by Kerry’s remarks earlier this week that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s objections to a proposed deal between six world powers and Iran was “premature,” as no deal had yet been signed. “Netanyahu has to understand that no agreement was signed between Iran and the world powers and his adamant objections are premature,” Kerry said. Erdan responded: “I have not heard such a claim for many years; this is a country that wants to destroy Israel and the conditions that will enable it to carry out its wishes. What do they expect from an Israeli prime minister? Not to cry out when the knife is in the hand, but only when it is across our throat?” “It is only thanks to the discussion about the terms being discussed in Geneva, behind closed doors, that we have received an additional delay of several days and perhaps even an improvement in the terms of the agreement,” he said. “We must not be mistaken – an interim agreement will be a permanent agreement. All those involved in the agreement must understand that the moment Iran becomes a nuclear threshold state an arms race will begin in the Middle East and regional uncertainty will increase.”
Smith Poll: 55%:31% Israel cannot count on US for security on Iranian nuclear issue ~by Dr. Aaron Lerner - IMRA 14 November 2013 Here are the findings of a telephone survey conducted on November 13, 2013 among 400 people / the representative sample of the adult Jewish population (ages 18 and up) . Sampling error - 4.5 % carried out by Smith Consulting for Israel Radio Reshet Bet's Hakol Diburim program - results broadcast on 14 November 2013 . Details of findings Do you think Israel can or can not count on the U.S. to take care of its security in negotiations with Iran on the nuclear issue ? Can count 31 % Can not count 55 % No opinion 14 % Do you think the U.S. government gave or did not give Netanyahu a reliable and accurate picture of the negotiations with Iran ? Gave accurate and reliable picture 24 % Did not give an accurate and reliable picture 42 % No opinion 34 % What is your position regarding Netanyahu's criticism of the U.S. government regarding the upcoming agreement with Iran on the nuclear issue: Criticism was justified and the right amount 40% Criticism was justified but excessive 22 % Criticism not justified 9 % No opinion 29 % -------------------------------------------- IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis Website: www.imra.org.il
