Would things have been better or worse if Hilary had won?

Question:
Had HRC won,
would things be better, worse, or about the same?

Analysis: Had HRC won, it would have been a continuation of the
sameness of Bill Clinton, Bush, Jr., and Obama.
The same foreign policy, not talking to N. Korea, ignoring Euros not paying their NATO bills.
Same domestic policy, what infrastructure. What employment with job quality?
Same war policies. No explanation needed.
A continuation of those 24 years of policies would not make things better. Would it?

That leaves a choice between, worse or just about the same. Which is it?
Well it really don't matter, do it.
Trump has already made things better and that would beat the highest possible
choice for HRC.

​

How not so?


Moi

Supports HRC
That's Why Trump Got Tough With
​

 

Yea, the economy is tanking right now due to the removal of all the silly regulations imposed by Obama.

Oh yea, it's been miserable watching my pay increase, my bonus get reinstated, my 401K and stocks equities/dividends increase in value, employment hit a record low and to watch all the prosperity flow back into the nation despite all the screaming and crying from those that can't get over the election.

Oh yea, it has just sucked. I sure hope we elect another socialist idiot who has no idea how to run a country again. Maybe Bernie should be President. I hear he loves breadlines. I can't wait to stand in one of those.

LOL - Some of you guys are just hilarious. Failed experiment.... LOL

 

People vote for idiots who are preferable to those who sneer and denigrate them.

 

well heaps better for those who donated to her campaign

 

While I agree that we would be much worse-off as a nation under Hillary Clinton, it does depend on what is meant by "things".

If Hillary had been elected we would still be saddled with that horrible Iran 'nuke' deal. We would have North Korea setting off hydrogen bombs regularly. We would have our wonderful "trading partners" robbing us blind (although there is nothing at all new in that). Worst of all would have been the fact that we would have been stuck with two more hyperliberal Justices on the Supreme Court, as bad (or even worse) than Sotomayor and Kagan. THAT alone would have completely wrecked us for decades to come!

The odd thing is that I think the economy would be roughly the same as it is now -- because the REAL decision-makers regarding everything of any REAL importance in the economy are the "men behind the curtain" in the Federal Reserve System. Both "W" Bush and Barack Obama were perfectly OK with having to be house-pets for the Fed, and although Trump has bitched about microscopic raises in the interest rate, back to what they SHOULD be, not even "the Donald" has been able to enforce his will against this über-powerful central banking cartel.

It is surely safe to assume that someone as ignorant, stupid, doctrinaire, and corrupt as Hillary would have been only too happy to have also gone right along with the Fed, because the truth is that nothing as relatively insignificant as a mere "President of the United States" can tell the Fed what to do any more... certainly not since summer of 2007 -- that's for sure!

 

Yes, to watch them squirm and have to endure a President they hate for 4 (8?) years.

 

That's not a terribly intelligent reason to vote for an incompetent candidate.

 

I don't, but I'm sure a lot of Trumpers would have been calling for it even to this day for no reason.

 

For what?