Would you become a terrorist against a UN led World Government?

Who, exactly, do you think runs the UN? Same folks who run Wall St.: globalist bankers.

Jesus...

 

"Would you become a terrorist against a UN led World Government? "


Terrorist? Freedom Fighter? Patriotic Citizen?


Where do I sign up?

 

I'm from the left, I'd welcome a shooting war with the Tea Party.

 

Maybe we should.

 

Truth.

 

I highly doubt that, since a lot of them are ex-military. However, I'm sure that you can throw coffee mugs or say bad things about them from your iPad.

 

No such job is available... In fact, I would interview you for the "beating down wallstreet protester" position, and you would send up a red flag. I am making notes in my new-world-order iPhone app.

 

Terrorism is based on attacking innocent people to cause fear and get your point accross. it is never acceptable........(Which is why I commonly condemn the use of the A-bonbs during WWII).

If such a government rose up, and was corrupt, I would fight against it politically, and militarily if there was need, but not through terrorism.

 

What makes you think a UN-led world government would be working against my interests any more than the government we've had right here for the last 30-40 years?

 

Because humans run both entities.

 

How do you not realize that Wall Street is what is helping to build the world government? Goldman Sachs alone is slowly taking over Europe because they've implemented their economic advisors in key positions of all of the major European governments, including prime ministers/presidents. They control the European Central Bank that is literally buying Greece up right now.

The IMF/World Bank is financed primarily by the Federal Reserve, which itself is dominated by powerful international bankers. The IMF/World Bank is slowly becoming the central bank of the world.

Are you seriously not paying attention? How do you not realize that Wall Street is the one pushing for this world government?

 

Because we have more freedom now than we would under a world government, which we would have absolutely no freedom.

 

Well,I think more than half of the World would become terrorists against such a state.

 

Yep, without any choice in the matter.

 

Right. So why would I become a terrorist fighting against the UN?

 

Alright, smart guy, here's your chance to explain the meaning of the terms to me.

 

Well, if you roll over and allow the thought police into your home, if you don't mind having no privacy, if you don't care about GMOs or what you eat, what you drink, how much food you can stockpile, if you're okay with pot smoking being criminal, etc. then you're all good.

 

See, I'm not sure we don't have all that stuff right now. Some computer somewhere can pull your complete profile together in milli-seconds if it wants to, the last time you filled your tank, bought a can of corn, had a chest x-ray, everything. I don't think the government particularly cares about your profile, but the corporations who want to sell you stuff surely do.

 

Freedom and liberty are based on the principles of Individualism, not collectivism.

 

They only care about the profiles of "suspected terrorists" (ie. political dissenters).

 

The Tea Party is in league with the UN and World Government?

 

I might fight against them, but I wouldn't be a terrorist. They might call me a terrorist.

 

These guys were called "terrorists" by the British:



You can call me what you will. But if it comes to fighting the New World Order and the UN on US soil? I will kill anyone associated with them.

 

Because people don't read anymore, that's why.

 

In your world, should corporate ownership and shares of stock be illegal? Even a partnership is a collective. What the hell is a corporation if it is not a collective? Why is it that so many people voluntarily join collectives if collectives are so evil? Ergo, I believe your song and dance about freedom and liberty is just more Randian shuck 'n jive.