Would you become a terrorist against a UN led World Government?

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by SiliconMagician, Jan 21, 2011.

  1. DivineComedy

    DivineComedy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,629
    Likes Received:
    841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No.

    I would suggest a US flag (or some sort of Battle Flag if the US flag was a State flag of the UN), on the arm and carry arms openly with the minority of the States that did not vote for the Party of Treason's treaty establishing the one world government through treaty.

    Most likely since that possiblity is way off, even with a Party of Treason in the Senate, and a treasonous president who supports only some protections from politically motivated procecutions at the ICC, the young ones would have to get a lot of easy chairs and prop many of us up in the back of a pick-up trucks like Beverly Hillbilly's granny.

    The "Technicals" would defininately have to make war against our own people; the heart of the establishment (HERE) would be our own people.

    For such a One World Government to be legal our Constitution would have to be amended. If it was, amended, I would just be a disgrunted old fart figuring that We the People get what they deserve.
     
  2. AceFrehley

    AceFrehley New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    8,582
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have a pretty simple view on this. The US is the greatest country in the world. Why on Earth would we let inferior nations determine our destiny? But to answer the OP subject heading question: OH HELL YES.
     
  3. AceFrehley

    AceFrehley New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    8,582
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hmmm... interesting you didn't mention the cost of government in your (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) list.
     
  4. AceFrehley

    AceFrehley New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    8,582
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, it's been bastardized by lunatic liberals. "Freedom and liberty" now mean "free stuff provided by taking money from some other guy".
     
  5. AceFrehley

    AceFrehley New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    8,582
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wow, you must have slept through the OWS protesters' violence, threats of violence, intimidation and coercion.
     
  6. skeptic-f

    skeptic-f New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Messages:
    7,929
    Likes Received:
    100
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It would all depend on what principles such a UN world government operated. If it was mainly acceptable I'd probably grit my teeth and put up with it; if it was mainly unacceptable I'd go about getting that sniper rifle.
     
  7. darckriver

    darckriver New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    7,773
    Likes Received:
    239
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I dunno... hell, imagine how many problems would be solved right now with just four nuclear bombs - one for each of Washington, DC, New York, Chicago, and LA.
     
  8. Kurmugeon

    Kurmugeon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2012
    Messages:
    6,353
    Likes Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    83
    No, the question posed by the OP is un-realistic and/or irrelevant.


    What you're suggesting is like asking; "would you commit undeserved acts of violence and vengeance against NAZI SS concentration camp guards?"..... You CAN'T, they deserve anything you give ‘em.


    Or, to use your scenario: "if you won $1M in the 2nd term ObamaNation, how would you spend the money"..... You CAN'T, because having $1M in the ObamaNation, and not being a Socialist Party Elite, the new wealth would make you one of the EVIL Rich, and you'd have 99.999% of it taxed away, and rampant inflation would make what is left useless.


    If the U.N. were to get total control of the world via some sort of socialist utopian dream government, the various already corrupt leaders of the U.N. would be at each other's throats before the news of the new government could travel from New York to Bangkok. You would not be able to act fast enough to attack it before they destroyed themselves.


    Now if the Pseudo-Communist Chinese Authoritarians managed to get a hold of world power, something that would endure long enough to be a threat, Yes, I would join the resistance to pull down such an evil governing body.


    I would not live under a world wide authoritarian socialist government, and all of the abuse and evil that would entail. But you would not need to attack a U.N. lead government, just get out of the way and let it destroy itself.

    -
     
  9. jonesy

    jonesy New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I guess it would depend on their reach. I wouldn't go out of my way to be a terrorist, but I would defend my property in all circumstances and may possibly be labelled a terrorist if the would-be world laws barred such defence.
     

Share This Page