Would you become a terrorist against a UN led World Government?

A privately formed collective of voluntary participants is a far cry than using the coercive power of the State to force people into collective financial partnerships!

Freedom, in a political context, means freedom from coercion of the State. It does not mean freedom from the employer, or freedom from want, sickness, death or the natural laws that keep men from all achieving financial nirvana within a single lifetime. Freedom means freedom from State coercion and nothing else.

For the proletariat to use Democracy to steal the property of their social betters for redistribution by the State to them is morally abhorrent.

 

This is extremism, if there are any attacks on the UN, they will come to this thread first. Interpol, feds, etc..so tread lightly here.

Would I no, any form of violent resistance that isn't approved by our government, is called unlawful and will not be tolerated by the Obama administration.

So please take heed, and do not advocate for any violence, against the UN soldiers. Good Day.

 

If UN soldiers were to occupy the US and the UN declared one world government over the United States, it would be our duty to fight the UN and the New World Order. I have said it before, I would have no problem with killing the enemy on our soil if the time comes.

I Hope that was clear enough for you.




This is why the law abiding citizens of this country and the world need to be armed to protect our homes and if need be, or country(s).

 

Bump for good measure.

 

The President is liberal and the UN is liberal, if he makes an executive order to allow UN troops to occupy our soil for any reason, and anyone commits violence against them, it will be considered unlawful and they will be penetrated to the fullest extent of the law.

It is unlawful combat for citizens to rebel against the government of the United States, militias are considered domestic terrorists by this administration.

This is pertinant information, for anyone that belongs to an armed militia in the USA.

 

I presume you mean that it is morally neat-o for the "social betters" to employ the State to confiscate property from the proletariat for redistribution to themselves. Because that is the ONLY thing that has been goin' on in this country for the past 40 years.

 

What property would that be? Getting upand going to work and recieving a market value wage is not theft. It's free labor.

When you buy a product, you are voluntarily surrendering your money to the rich in exchange for a product. That is not theft, it is voluntary exchange.

So please tell me exactly what it is that the proletariat is having stolen from them? It seems to me the proletariat is busy giving their money away in exchange for products and then demands a partial refund through Government taxation.

 

The rich have leverage over us, like they give us food, we can't survive without food from their farms and stores, so we are forced to make an exchange of our money.

Its not a voluntary exchange when they coerce us to give up our money for their goods and services, and its not fair.

 

What? Are you really trying to say you shouldn't have to pay for products?

 

Of course not. Terrorism is stupid. It's a gigantic waste of time. If there's a One World Government then everyone will already know about it. It's kind of pointless blowing random things (and people) up if there isn't a heads-up that goes along with it.

What would be worse than a global government would be a corporate government here in the United States. And we're very close to that point. Our government is required by law to uphold your rights, but corporations are not. I really wouldn't want to have to shop at the corporate store. Nor end up in debtor's prison when the paycheck isn't big enough to pay for the food (like, say, if there's a holiday in the middle of the week).

I'm not too worried about the UN. They're largely pointless and ineffectual.

I'm much more worried about the bankers. They're real, and here today, and causing a lot of damage.

 

In family style dining, all dishes are shared. Ever heard of a communal society?

 

You're paranoid. We're never going back to the days of company stores and towns and bankers don't sit in boardrooms plotting how to take over your life.

They make loans and hold deposits and invest in society at large. That is not necessarily an evil thing.

 

No, it's worse than that. They plot how to make the volatility greater than the value of the underlying assets, thereby tanking the entire world's economy. They do this in the name of their own profits, nothing more. They don't give a rat's patootie about you or me. Patriots they're not. They have zero allegiance to the United States of America. This is reality friend. You can try to deny it, but everywhere you turn it'll whack you in your face till you're awake. Obviously you're a deep sleeper. Maybe there will still be coffee around when you wake up (if you do it quickly).

So what? I make loans and hold deposits and invest in society at large too. The only difference is, I'm not out there ripping anyone off. Whereas the bankers are ripping off every man, woman, and child in the United States, and have been doing so for at least 20 years. Ever since 1991 when Gramm-Leach-Bliley was passed into law. You do know what happened to Phil Gramm after he left Congress, right? You do know who Mel Watt is, right? You seem to be in denial about our present situation. It's bad, worse than anything you've heard in the lamestream media.

Would you like some details? Where would you like to start?

 

There hasn't been a voluntary exchange in this country since the beads/Manhattan transfer. There has been plenty of extortion, but if want to call that voluntary, I suppose you are correct.

 

If extortion is voluntary, then I suppose he's right, eh?

 

I'm saying we should be paying about $.25 on the $1.00 for products. The other $.75 has been extorted out of us through unfair trade practices, lobbies with their bought-and-paid-for congressmen, ridiculous patent laws, mergers where 95% market shares are legitimized, trade and professional associations where, of course, nobody would EVER rig prices, and presidents who sole purpose is to perpetuate and enhance the unfair trade practices.

 

World government could subdue the rogue states.

 

But not the insurgency.

 

In your dreams. Rebels in the US alone would be enough to take out the wimpy globalist thugs.

Molon Labe!

 

Any globalist army would be populated by wimpy European socialists anyway. They don't know how to fight. An American insurgency would reign terror on them.

 

I have basically two big reasons why I think that a single global government would be a bad thing.

1) Powerful civilizations have thus far always relied on human exploitation.

2) There always needs to be a rebel.

For these reasons, I don't think it'll work out. Maybe something will change in humanity and I'll be surprised. But a surprise it would be.

 

If our President allowed any foreign entity to occupy our soil for any reason, our President would be committing treason and would therefor be considered an enemy, no better than the occupying force. any we citizens would not be rebelling against the US Government because at that point the US government would be no more and would also be considered an enemy. If you or anyone else stood with the enemy, you would be considered no better than that enemy.

Are you sure you don't want to change your answer?

 

Wow.

Actually you should study more about the history of this country.

 

The basic premise of the OP question is moot.


If the Chinese Psuedo-Communists were able to pull together a World Government under their control, it might last long enough to be a problem.


If the United Nations were to be handed world control on a silver platter, it would collapse under U.N. internal power struggles long before any significant Terrorist plot could be set in motion.


The Only thing that has ever unified the various power players of the United Nations, is hatred of the United States.


If the U.S. were subsumed into the world government, the U.N. would fragment faster than the Democratic Party would if all the productive white people suddenly immigrated from the U.S. to the Planet Mars.

-

 

It's not moot. It's like asking someone what would you if you won $100,000,000. Everyone gives their answers except for people like you that say: "What a stupid question, cus it's not going to happen.

Just answer the question. Jeez!