Z Never Had A Broken Nose

I can see to you that it is critical to you to promote race riots but you should remember that the best tactical shotguns are hard to find right now. Once you get the blacks burning and killing you might want to stand way to the side because a lot of people set their shotguns to create a pretty wide spread.

It is your expert opinion that Zimmerman could not have had a broken nose because when he went to the doctor he told the doctor that he might have a broken nose. I suppose that when you go to the doctor you just sit down and let her try to figure out why you are there?? I certainly had a broken nose and did not have a deviates septum. I had a lot of bleeding and just like Zimmerman I had black eyes for the next few days.

If you can bear it, watch some UFC fights and you will see that some of them get all cut and swollen while others look untouched after a pretty good beating.

But such evidence doesn't fit your race riot agenda, does it??

 

What's the difference if it's broken or not? The fact is he was punched in the nose and the police report said it looked like it could be broken. Doesn't add or take away anything from the case if it was broken or not.

 

So you with no medical background or up close examination is just complete fabrication on whether or not his nose is actually broken. There is no need for Xray or radiation exposure if the sceptum isnt deviated cause there is nothing they do for a broken nose.

Swelling of the eyes does NOT happen instantly on a broken nose, especially a slightly fractured on. Quite trying to use pictures you have seen with contridicting reports as your evidence.

 

From your source:

"A medical report compiled by the family physician of Trayvon Martin shooter George Zimmerman and obtained exclusively by ABC News found that Zimmerman was diagnosed with a "closed fracture" of his nose, a pair of black eyes, two lacerations to the back of his head and a minor back injury the day after he fatally shot Martin during an alleged altercation."

 

Well,it does not matter "what PEOPLE said or claimed". PEOPLE are not providing testimony at the trial.

So what are you saying? That Zimmerman was only "slightly hurt", and therefore should have only been "slightly" concerned for his life?

 

It isn't speculation. The medical report speculates it was broken which means there is no actual proof it was broken as many have repeatedly claimed.

Funny how you don't care people repeatedly said his nose was broken with no evidence at all and when it is proven it was not broken you only get upset with people who point out that fact.

 

That's not what your source reported. Stop lying.

_

 

I repeat, it doesn't make one bit of difference if it was broke or not. Police thought it could be. He was bleeding from the nose. Doesn't add or take away from the case at all.

 

The most important part for the case is Z claimed T punched him in the nose and it was so hard it knocked him down. The medical evidence disputes that because a punch in the nose hard enough to knock down a 185 pound has to be hard enough to break the nose.

It is just more evidence Z lied about what happened and even the EMTs Report only said his nose was "tender."

 

And his eyes were blue, consistant with a broken nose. NEXT

 

Come now!

You are clearly blowing smoke!

It doesn't matter in the least if GZ had a broken nose or not.

The important thing is TM was the aggressor in this incident, and GZ was merely defending himself from a viscous attack by this young brute.

We must conclude most of the liberals in this group do not practice the art of common sense. Here is the reason I say this.

The person doing the attacking would not call out for help. He does not want to call attention to the fact he is breaking the law. The person being attacked is the person who would call out for help.

The eyewitness accounts clearly say Trayvon was on top of George Zimmerman and beating him about the face with his fists.

Therefore we must logically conclude GZ was the one who was calling out for help.

These painful wounds were NOT self inflicted.

 

I have been hit directly on the nose by a 250 lb guy that knocked me on my butt, but it did not break my nose. You are creating your own facts. And "yes" my nose was "tender".

Also, you do not put a band-aid on a bloody nose.

 

Yes and with no septal deviation there was no need to go any further. As far as the doctor was concerned Zimmerman probably did have a broken nose but with no deviation it would heal without any further treatment so there was no need to do x-rays to confirm the break.

 

I think we need to remember here how stupid this argument is.

Because the doctor saw no need to do further tests to confirm the broken nose as without deviation it would heal fine on its own without treatment we are to conclude that Zimmerman did not have a broken nose.

The argument is beyond asinine.

 

The injuries show he was not in any mortal danger at all as he claimed. It's funny you don't care how many false claims are made by Z supporters.

 

Did you ever find the proof Reuters invented "white Hispanic" just for this case?

 

The doctor never CONCLUDED the nose was broken so it is asinine to claim it was broken. The medical report says "we discussed it was likely broken" That means there is no actual proof it was broken as many have claimed. What is asinine is to see Z supporters dance like hell when they are proven wrong because the medical report does not prove a broken nose.

 

...so if I smacked my wife in the same manner it wouldn't be a big deal then?...



Kabuki Joe

 

I thought Zimmerman was fighting for his life so he shot a kid to death ?

 

The injuries are consistent with Zimmerman's story. The severity of his injuries are irrelevant. It is YOUR OPINION that the injuries were not serious enough to warrant "mortal danger".

I could care less about claims made by people on a political forum, factual or false. This political forum is not a court, nor is it an official judge and jury. Zimmerman's fate does not rest with what is posted here.

 

Why don't you tell us again how repeatedly punching someone ALWAYS leaves marks on the hands?

Remember when you dismissed the funeral director's statement about no marks showing a fight on T's hands on the basis it was not the autopsy report? Well, the autopsy report stated there was only one abrasion on T's left ring finger below the knuckle.

Maybe you can claim the Martin family paid people off for that autopsy report?

 

All the medical evidence does not support Z's claim. Don't you think it is odd the EMT's didn't notice a broken nose if it was really broken?

 

And the medical report does not prove it WASN'T broken. If anything, the statement "we discussed it was likely broken" adds more credibility that it WAS broken then naught.

 

I never said you put a band aid on a broken nose. Next straw man.

No I don't believe you were in squarely in the nose hard enough to knock you down and it didn't break your nose.