Z Never Had A Broken Nose

Do you have a full transcript of what you call her first testimony?

 

Both experts states unequivocally it was not Z screaming. Period.

All of Z's injuries were very minor. They were so minor, the autopsy was done on T before Z even went to his doctor.

 

When you have evidence she claimed in the statement she released through her attorney post it, until it does not exist. That you wish it to does not make it so and your ad hominems only demonstrate you have nothing to prove it otherwise.

 

Likely broken and you have nothing to refute it, that you wish it so does not make it so.

 

Likely broken, waiting for your medical evidence that refutes it, not your wishes, evidence.

 

Yes he did as evidenced by the 911 tapes and his girl friend, unless of course you are going to try and engage in an inane argument over walking fast and running.

 

That you can't refute it with facts and evidence is noted again.

 

Likely broken and you have nothing to refute it, that you wish it so does not make it so.

 

The EMS report does not support the claim it was likely broken. Between the ems report and the pics of Z's face showing no broken nose, there is more evidence it was not broken.

Then again why should anyone care what you think? I've already proven you claimed T circled Z's car and you still deny it even after I posted the proof.......

 

The ems report and pics of Z refute it but I'm sure dishonest claims won't slow you down.....lol.....

 

You quote the post containing the facts that refute it then say it wasn't refuted......lol.........with people like you defending Z the Prosecution can go on vacation!!!

 

Dude. You are trying to tell us what a witness heard. Enough said...

 

And you have no evidence otherwise.

Moot point, the person being attacked doesn't have to wait for them to be "serious" which is a subjective use of the word on your part. The THREAT is all the law requires.

No you don't know and are once again engaged in pure conjecture. You do know your conjecture is not evidence or fact.

Moot point even it true but more of you pure and utter conjecture.

No it is not a proven fact, he apporached Zimmerman first and walked around, not necessarily in a circle, the vehicle he was sitting in for 42 seconds. Then after having run off and back to the apartment he was staying at returned to seek out Zimmerman and confront him.

Will have no bearing.

Pure and utter unqualified speculation on your part.

Pure and utter conjecture.

The FBI says nothing can be determined from the voice analysis

"ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - An FBI expert found crucial evidence in the Trayvon Martin case was inconclusive, saying it was impossible to tell if the voice screaming for help belonged to the black Florida teenager or his shooter George Zimmerman just before the neighborhood watch captain pulled the trigger.

That detail came from a mass of evidence made public on Thursday in the case that sparked civil rights protests across the United States and debates over guns, self-defense laws and race relations in America."
http://news.yahoo.com/trayvon-marti...-002214340.html;_ylt=A2KJ3CZGTb5PFmQAD_zQtDMD


and please post from the EMT report which says his nose was not likely broken.

 

Dude you are trying to make up what she said she heard in her statement released through her attorney.

 

Post where the EMT report says his nose is likely not broken, the pictures back up the injuries to the nose which according to the doctor was likely broken.

 

i never said it was or wasnt, its you stating your sorry ass opinion as fact, not me. im speculating it could possibly be broken because of THE DOCTOR that looked at Z's injuries and he said that its likely to be broken.

you on the other hand are the one with something to prove, in which you cant because you werent there, you didnt examine Z's nose and im pretty sure as hell you aint no doctor.

there is a difference between you and I, i dont go around posting my opinion or speculation as truth. you are the kind of person who spreads false rumors, or a drama queen/gossip girl type person who only wants to hear what you wanna hear.

like i said a many times, thanks to the liberals and their media morons this case is a hell of alot larger than it should have been and you guys have done way more harm than good by far.

so why dont you go edit some more video, find some audio you can cut up to fit your agenda and go try to start another race war ok? its obviously all a liberal is good for these days, spreading bull(*)(*)(*)(*) lies.

 

Post where it says his nose was likely not broken.

Oh you have an Xray? You can see below the skin? You are a trained medical expert?

More pure and utter conjecture on your part.

Grow up.

 

oh then please do tell, what race are mexicans since you know so much about us. gonna say us brown people are white boys?

 

more straw men and dishonesty......let me know when you can get on board with being honest. Starting with you claiming T circled Z's truck.

 

Mexicans are different races just like Americans are different races. You actually claimed Hispanic is a race which proved to everyone you don't have the first clue what you are talking about.

 

You are dishonest about your own claims, edit facts out of others' posts that you don't like, then say "grow up." Priceless.

 

so the witness you agree with is straight fact and not a doubt of being made up, but witnesses you dont agree with are all liars?

gotcha. once again proof liberals only accept what they wanna hear, everyone elses opinions or facts that do not agree with the progressive status quo are to be silenced and eliminated.

 

some dumb ass tells me mexicans are all muts and im the one who doesnt know what im talking about??? you are a racist.

 

and what the hell are you doing with this OP? totally dishonest thread about something nobody here can prove as truth, yet because you believe in your opinion so much its automatically true?

you tell us you know for a fact Z's nose isnt broken with really no eveidence of it either way at all, then when we question you you tell us to prove its broken? WTF are you 9?

 

I never said any of that at all. The only witness I questioned was the one who gave two different versions of what he saw and I was right to suspect what he said because he already retracted his claim be saw T punching on Z with "MMA" style punches.