Zimmerman Trial Day 5

That statement indicates that Martin was aware the Z was stalking him and feared for his life. When Z finally caught up with Martin Z pulled out his gun and shot Martin dead. So Martin was right in his opinion of Z. Therefore black people should be aware that if the notice a "creepy ass cracka'" stalking them that there's a very high probability that the "creepy ass cracka'" fully intends to kill them in cold blood.

 

Good said in his opinion it was Zimmerman screaming for help. BUT really >> http://www.politicalforum.com/member-casual-chat/307247-doesnt-matter-whose-voice.html

10 seconds is not enough time to slam the head repeatedly ? Huh ? It 's enough time to slam it 10 times.

What do I think ? I think you need to jump ship like those people on CNN and HLN who heard Good's and Smith's testimonies, and went from being a Trayvonite to a Georgite, in one day.

 

Since the cops failed to take any pictures at the crime scene there's no evidence that Z was injured there. It's pure speculation as to how he got his reputed wounds.

 

There were no pictures of the crime scene taken by the police?

Really?

 

If they say they still think that, it won't be "honestly".

 

Let's get some clarity. I'll say this in many different ways: Crakkker and racist White person are interchangeable in the Black community. Black people call racist White people crakkkers,rednecks,honkies,pink-toes,peckerwoods,skinheads and klansmen. We call nice White people who do not exhibit bigotry White. So to say White racist crakkker would be redundant. Zmans actions of watching and stalking Trayvon is what caused Trayvon to label him as a "creepy ass crakkker", again crakkker is interchangeable with racist White person in most African-American communities. It's the same phenomena that happens when Blacks go into department stores and are followed by White employees of said store. The Black person may instantly label that White person as racist thereby a crakkker simply because we perceive that the ONLY reason we're being followed by them is because we're Black. We may then assume that the behavior is a policy of said store and may then label the store in general as a racist/crakkker establishment. Now if we go to another White owned store and not be surveilled we will not consider that establishment as racist. If Trayvon had only seen Zman once or twice while walking home and Zman didn't appear to be following or spying on him then Trayvon would not have referred to him as a "creepy ass crakkker", because his actions wouldn't have necessarily supported the label. GDAY!!!

 

May 31st ? Pheeeeeww! (high-pitched whistle)

 

Racist post quota has been met for today.

 

That's cool how you did that... put kkk in a racial epithet. Irony fails are the best.

So... are we using racist terms now because the dead thug did? I don't think that is going to go your way... just sayin.

 

And imagine how "OFFENDED" this poster would be, if we were to throw the N word in. But he figures the C word is OK, since it's only Whites that it's offensive against. (in HIS mind)

 

I'm a person who ALWAYS said that Trayvon beat Zman up because he perceived Zman as a threat. Being followed first by car and then on foot by a "creepy ass crakkker" says it all. The boy was scared and whether he hit Zman first has ALWAYS been irrelevant in my theory, though I still believe Zman tried to hold him for the police. One can argue that Zman setup his intent to confront and shoot Trayvon by listening to the call he made saying he's "Black and approaching him", had "something in his hand", "something is wrong with him", and "his hand is near his waist". ALL of these things are typical of what the police say after they are found to have shot an unarmed Black man.Oh and they're usually found not guilty.

He should have stayed in his car and let the police whom he had just called do their job. Neighborhood Watch are supposed to be unarmed and just watch & report. He was going to Target, he should have just reported and went to Target.

 

Why would there be? They didn't regard the shooting as a crime.

Do you have any pictures taken by the cops at the time of the murder?

 

What if the guy following and confronting Trayvon was Black ? Would you have a name for him ? I would. I'd call him a security person doing his job correctly, to the definitions of the state of Florida. (Florida Dept. of Agriculture & Consumer Services, Division of Licensing) And this would be true, no matter what color he was.

 

I wouldn't be offended at all. It's just a word and it has no power over me I'm not RUMPELSTILTSKIN. Besides some posters here convey all of the classic signs of life long racists without ever using that word. GDAY!!!

 

Z would have made an excellent fugitive slave hunter. He thought that he was living in 1850 Florida and he initially got away with killing what he perceived of as an escaped slave. But then the bleeding hearts started a ruckus and now he's on trial. But I expect him to walk. It's Florida after all.

 

If you recall Jeantel said that Trayvon also called Zman a nicca as well. But if walking in the rain with a hoodie on makes one suspect then perhaps that neighborhood should adopt a dress code. IJS.
Again NWatch are supposed to be unarmed.

Stand Your Ground should apply to Trayvon since he perceived Zman as a threat.

 

With Trayvon moving about, how could Zimmerman "watch" (as you say) him, if he stayed in his car ? You're asking for Zimmerman to "watch" Trayvon, but you're telling him to stay in his car, where he can't watch him. You're contradicting yourself (along with 1000s of others).

 

well, if you're Black, you SHOULD be offended by being called that word, just as Whites should be offended by being called the C word. Or the H word.

 

I cosign 99% of your post, but I think they may get him with a lesser charge. I don't know what that charge would be though. That state isn't done, this case is far from over.

 

maybe littering?

 

The new word for whites is "'Nilla".

http://gawker.com/will-you-white-crackers-please-stop-whining-for-the-lov-599200777

 

I would be offended by someone I had to work with calling me that, but not a neighbor. I don't have to interact with the latter but my work environment should be a healthy one maintained by law.

 

1. A hoodie isn't what made Trayvon be suspicious. Walking around in the rain and looking at people's windows was.

2. NW are supposed to be unarmed by NW standards, maybe. But NW standards are generally a joke, and usually wrong due to their reliance on police ideas, instead of professional security standards (Florida Dept. of Agriculture & Consumer Services, Division of Licensing) I's say ALL security people should be licensed & armed.

3. Trayvon could stand his ground, but what was there for him to stand his ground from ? Zimmerman did not attack Trayvon, or even threaten him. I sense that you are racistly backing Trayvon (and smearing Zimmerman) just because Trayvon is Black, and so are you. That's dumb. I'm White & Hispanic. Would I back somebody just because they're White & Hispanic. Of course not. I'd back them if they deserved to be backed, and for no other reason.

 

You should be offended by ANYBODY calling you that (including another Black person).

 

If he was in the capacity of a NWatch he should have just reported what he saw, which was nothing and took his ass to Target. If he was not in the NWatch he could approach Trayvon and ask him questions, but then after being followed first by car and then on foot, in the dark by a stranger, what should a scared teenager do??? Keep in mind the defense agrees he wasn't committing a crime and that he was on the phone relaying that he perceived him as a "creepy ass crakkker". Jeantel suggested he run. He ran and Zman got out of his car and chased him for a time by his own admission. At some point they are face to face. I contend that Zman continued to chase Trayvon, confronted him, tried to hold him for the cops, Trayvon beat his ass and Zman shot the poor child dead.