All he determined was that he was suspicious. That is not crime "rate" the is just the amount of crime. Which demographic has the highest crime RATE? And what percentage of crimes do blacks commit versus their percentage of the population? FOX showed the numbers today for murder. They represent 13% of the population yet commit over 50% of all murders. Here from one poster who did the research Racial Murder Statistics the Left and Others don't want you to know (Vanity) March 27,2012 | justanotherokie "Posted on 3/27/2012 6:47:25 PM by ImJustAnotherOkie I spent a little time browsing FBI Crime Stats for 2010(Last year that has been finalized) and made some interesting discoveries. Did you know that 90% of blacks are murdered by blacks, and 83% of whites are murdered by whites? Did you know that there are 14.82 murders per 100K by blacks versus 2.17 per 100K for whites? Per capita there are 7x more murders committed by blacks than whites." http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2864689/posts Want to focus on one city http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2011/06/15/the-color-of-crime-chicago/
Yes he was and lost Zimmerman and was back at the apartment when he decided to go an confront Zimmerman, then decided to assault him. Two bad decisions that cost him his life.
Did TM have any bruises on his body? Did Z have any concrete debris in his head wounds? Did he have any bruises on his hands, arms. torso, or legs? Did Z have scuff marks on the back of his shoes? Did Z have any grit, tears, or abrasions on his clothes? Were the toes of TM's shoes scuffed, was the knee area on his pants scuffed and filled with concrete grit? If none of those things happened then how can anyone conclude that there was a fight as Z described and that the "witnesses" lied about?
Being suspicious, he never said he saw him commit a crime did he. Did he say to the NEN dispatcher that the guy he was looking at is one of the guys committing crimes? Nope, just that he was acting suspicious. So what?
Z was setting the stage so that when the cops arrived they would immediately shoot TM for being a criminal. But he saw an opportunity to did it himself and he did and he got away with it. Isn't America great?
Nope, indicating he was not attacked. Have no idea if he did nor why he would, it was set concrete and had been raining washing off any debris concrete or otherwise. Don't know did anyone look over his hands arms torso of legs for bruising and why would he necessarily have to have such to indicate self defense? Do know but have no reason to expect he would, the ground was wet and therefore very soft and covered with grass. No and he wouldn't necessarily have any. No why would he, the fight never got to where they were entirely on the concrete, just Zimmerman's head. Non-sequitor, the witnesses support Zimmerman's statements of events and nothing you posted refutes it at all. - - - Updated - - - How was he setting the stage when he had no idea where Martin was and it was Martin who confronted him and the attacked him? But do post the evidence which supports you claim that Zimmerman had plotted this all out in the beginning.
Wow, seven statements and 6 wrong. The only non wrong answer was the dumb one about concrete in Z's head.
Nope. it's hard to get bloodstains out of clothing because it's a Protein stain. and Protein stains take some work to get out so short of using a washing machine, blood will always remain on the fibers of clothing. you have to really scrub to get blood stains out. and a washing machine is the only thing that can get them out.
....not true . But on par with your posting standards. I'd ask for you to present evidence , but at this point I don't think you understand what that is .
I could be wrong but I don't think the water was hot that night and they damn sure didn't have any soap.
Complete LIE. The picture was not taken "literally moments" after Martine was shot. It was taken more than a half an hour after Martin was shot. Make up some more bullcrap...speaking of "not passing the 'smell test' ".
Weren't there actual doctors in this case that already discussed this at length? Why are people here using webMD to try and explain whats already been decided? Sheeeesh people? Give it a rest with the cover up crap.
There was no blood smearing. Stevie Wonder can see that, and that's why he's convinving all Entertainers to boycott Florida, and they are doing it in mass. Florida will end up filing Bankruptcy like Detroit, because the majority of their econoomy hinges on Entertainment and Tourism dollars. And when that happens, Martial Law is not far behind.
There does not seem to be a competent pathologist on Florida, including that lying quack Di Maio. You do not reduce a fracture accidentally, and there would be bruising beyond the point of impact. Also, I expect a man with military experience to know about what causes a man to lose consciousness immediately on being shot in the heart. "Psychological" my ass! Don't tell me that fool never heard of "hydrostatic shock." He should, further, know that global edema of the brain does not occur after there is no blood pressure, but that hydrostatic shock could cause a massive spike in BP. Quacks, the lot of them.
You really think millions of people are going to stop visiting FL over Trayvon? Think again=) Intelligent people understand that the only places anyone is getting shot at random in any percentage worth noting, are places no one actually visits. Your fantasy is is just that....a dreamworld. Southbeach, Orlando, Tampa, will be perfectly fine. Please, don't visit my state. And no one will miss Stevie's concerts.
The photo was taken by the witness who Z asked to call his wife and it was so about 3 minutes after the shooting. When caught Zimm supporters, like their hero, fib and lie.
So people are aware, the mods decided all my analysis on GZ's different fibs should be combined into one single post. I disagree and therefore will not be posting any more research on this website.
Depends on the clothing and the time the blood has been on it. Blood is 80% water and very water soluble.