Depending on the fabric there can be some bonding of the blood protein and other blood byproducts and after it has begun to coagulate there is a bonding. On a hard surface or even the skin fresh blood washes off quite easily with water.
It doesn't make any difference anyway. The site has determined it doesn't want independent thinkers who provide facts, evidence and links with their analysis and opinions, as evidenced by their decision to combine all of my "Smell test" threads into one. I'll post my research elsewhere. I'm sure Z supporters will rejoice.
People who favor reason over what ifs will rejoice over your leaving. But I doubt you are leaving. I will look foward to identifying your next sock puppet.
Conspiracy theories are fun but the bottom line is that the wounds are there and they are real. So the only possibilities are that Z did it to himself or they were inflicted during a fight with Martin. I haven't heard of a rational person accusing Z of hurting himself.
That is a red herring, racial profiling constitutes a variable probability that a crime will take place based on race rather than character references. There are no conclusory statements that could warrant a profiling of race, as based to a general preponderance of crime and therefore 60 year old ladies should have no exclusion or benefits to it.
How does that make what I said a "red herring"? 60 y.o. ladies are not excluded based on race. How is that racial profiling?
The other bottom line is that Zimmerman went after Martin in violation of the neighborhood watch rules and against the admonishment of the police, and apparently in an at least annoyed state of mind ("these (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s are always getting away").
How does someone go against something that hasn't occurred yet. NEN told him we dont need you to do after he had gotten out of his car and started following Martin not before. You have little to no evidence to suggest that he continued following after the NEN dispatchers instructions.
I didn't ask you if he immediately went back to his car. I asked you if you had any evidence that he continued following Martin. We know that Zimmerman testified that he continued east to retreat view circle to find an address. Had he gone south the confrontation would have occurred far further south. You have jack (*)(*)(*)(*).
Do you have a link to where Zimmerman testified as to that? If he was looking for an address, why would he continue walking away from his truck toward the back of the buildings where he had last seen Martin? - - - Updated - - - The point is he continued to walk away from his truck towards the back of the back building where the confrontation and shooting took place.
And the real bottom line is Zimm broke no laws while observing Tman....correct? He went to court and was found not guilty.....correct? Now, if you want to meet at the pub and BS about Z's judgement over a beer, I am down with that but mind you you will only hold my attention for a couple of minutes. Seems you could use some down time, grab the darts, playing for pints. Never understood how someone can stay on a forum for a greater part of the day....day in and day out with this subject. A whole world is out our front door.
While observing him, not that I know of. Correct. Fine if you're buying! It's an addiction. - - - Updated - - - Why would he have gone after Martin if he expected Martin wasn't there? Why would he have gotten out of his car, say he was following him and walk to the area behind the buildings?
This is circular reasoning. You said that "in their position, putting ones hands over anothers nose and mouth to keep them from shouting requires a fair amount of downward pressure. . .". What are you basing this on? Your whole argument depends that we treat your brazenly introduced opinion as a fact.
The Martin kid had four full minutes to go home, and Zimmerman had no clue where Martin was during that time. Martin didn't go home, however. He preferred to tryout his theory of hitting a guy in the nose to win a fight.... especially if the other guy was a "creepy-ass cracker". So, the god-like "black child" waits around for four minutes, confronts Zimmerman, cold-cocks Zimmerman, breaks his nose, jumps on him, and starts bashing Zimmerman's head into the concrete. Martin initiated the violence, and Zimmerman had every right to defend himself. Don't let left-wing dummies tell us that Zimmerman had to defend himself ONLY with his fists! If you're pinned on the ground, dazed from a punch to your nose, and having your head slammed on concrete, it doesn't matter if the other person is bigger than you, or if he's armed or not. If an unarmed man attacks a woman, the woman isn't restricted to using only her fists to defend herself. The same is true for an elderly person who's attacked by a younger and stronger opponent. The same is true of a person like Zimmerman who's been sucker-punched and semi-dazed, and who's continuing to be violently attacked. The ONLY crime committed, and the ONLY racism demonstrated during this incident was by Trayvon Martin!
What am I basing it on? How about Z's statements that the pressure was great enough to cut off his breathing.
Well, according to the shooter/killer. - - - Updated - - - Ya, duct tape. Tell us how much pressure you need when you're using hands.