60 year old ladies aren't racially profiled under for example, the stop and frisk policy. So it is racial profiling not to consider them as part of the category of criminals to be harassed, due to the exclusionary methods used for them to escape justice. So that is why it is racial profiling, because they are targeted by their race and youthful appearances instead of the content of their character.
And Zimmerman chose to follow a kid and kill him. He'll be paying for that for the rest of his life. Darwinism indeed.
George didn't decide to kill anyone. He shot to stop druggie Trayvon's attack. The more intelligent of the two prevailed. George will be just fine. The idiot liberals will find another "cause" to occupy their time and forget all about him. Meanwhile Trayvon will be worm food.
That doesn't even begin to make sense. How is it racial discrimination to exclude 60 year old ladies because they rarely commit crime? - - - Updated - - - Why are you so intent on inventing facts against Martin? You have no idea who attacked who.
I"m not inventing anything. THe evidence supports Trayvon being the attacker. NOthing supports him not being the attacker.
Complete nonsense. First off all, you stated he was the attacker as if it were fact when you have no idea what happened. Second, it is simply your opinion that the evidence supports Martin being the attacker. Finally, you claim that nothing supports him not being the attacker is nonsense as well. We know that Zimmerman left his truck to go after Martin. And we know that Zimmerman was at least annoyed about "these (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s always getting away." Those facts alone are evidence that it was Zimmerman who may have initiated the confrontation. Why are you so intent on inventing facts against Martin?
I think that the point he is making is that it is youths. It isn't based on race its based on a violent youth subculture that while more prevalent amongst the black community is also prevalent amongst the white community. Take a an example of white subculture. I use to bonce. If I see a juiced up guy, with a faux hawk, fake tribal tats, fake jewelry, and a fake tan, guess what? That is a likes to fight (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)bag and I'm going to watch him like a hawk.
Nothing you presented shows George was the aggressor. Again, I am not inventing anything. The facts are facts and they show Trayvon was the aggressor. That has been shown time and again and especially in the courtroom where a jury delivered a not guilty verdict. Thanks for playing but you lose.
Thanks for sharing your opinions. I'll call you out every time you falsely assert them as fact. Why are you so intent on inventing facts against Martin?
I'm talking about your assertion that Martin was the attacker when you don't know whether that is true or not. Why do you invent facts against Martin?
Racial discrimination is based on exceptions, whites commit lesser crimes than minorities so this rule just gives similar luxuries to senior citizens. All groups should be targeted equally, and shouldn't get passes since that is fair.
Look there go some foreign guys with backpacks full of pressure cookers. No we can go after them, we have not hit our quota on old ladies with knitting needles yet.
Bull(*)(*)(*)(*)! I've bounced you have not! That is how I supported myself in college. I see a juiced up white guy with a faux hauk and tribal tats I'm watching him like a hawk because he is going to start a fight. A black guy comes in wearing a nice suit or casual cloths I don't pay him a moments notice. Its the sub-culture you are representing with how you present yourself that gets profiled not your race. There are in fact black (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) bags and white gangstas. I actually would watch the white gangstas are usually more prone to start (*)(*)(*)(*). In their case I am in part racially profiling. Most gangstas are black but gangsta is a sub culture not a race. Most (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)bags are white but (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)bagery is a sub culture not a race. Both subcultures are prone to violence. If you act like a gangsta you get profiled as a gangsta white or black. If you act like a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)bag you get profiled as a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)bag white or black.
Hmmmm, so how does a teenager walking home from the store act like a gangsta? He is not paying any attention to you until you start (*)(*)(*)(*)ing with him.
SAys who? It is a fact that trayvon was a violent punk and if you look at the route he took he went out of his way to pursue George.
Asinine at best. I want even ask you to prove he was violent or prove that he was gay, because you haven't over the last year no reason to believe you could now. He pursued Zimmerman. This is probably the same type of thinking that was going on in that jury room, no wonder a black man can't get Justice.