Noah's flood its reality

Science cannot prove it didnt happen, merely point to the common sense facts of the extraordinary improbability of it.

 

Is that supposed to be a historical fact?

 

Disregard my last post. I am playing catch up after being away from the computer yesterday.

 

Oh come on.....God can do anything, Mana from Heaven, turning rocks into water, pop-up shade trees....just name it.

 

This is easy. If a world wide flood happen (as described in the bible), we would see Population Bottlenecks in all sorts of animals, but we do not.

Science disproving the bible with evidence (DNA/Genetics).

 

He will now ignore your post, and come up with a new question or explain that the evidence must be "Empirical".

You should ask him to provide ANY evidence for ANY of the wonderfully imaginative claims he makes.

 

"improbability"? Are you indicating a usage of numerology--- the making of predictions based on numbers? At any rate, it is good to know that you are stating on the record what science 'cannot prove' in this scenario. Yet it is strange that scientists can say in a matter of fact manner (render an interpretation) what was supposed to have happened a few billion years ago (the big bang).

 

Do you have evidence that a 'big bang' did not happen? Do you have evidence that contracts scientific findings of a big bang? If you do, by all means, pleas present it.

 

Of course they are false.. Exodus never happened. Its a great yarn, but ridiculous on the scale of fairy tales.

Sinai belonged to Egypt and had no water or pasture.. Further... Egypt had troops garrisoned in Sinai and collected tribute from the Canaanite town there.

Plus.. all the plagues are quite natural occurrences .. including the .

 

You should quit being so presumptuous. As you see from my last post, you are WRONG.

 

That would depend on ones interpretation of 'big bang'.

 

Do you have evidence that a 'big bang' did not happen? Do you have evidence that contracts scientific findings of a big bang? If you do, by all means, please present it.

 

Ahem....

The bolded is the question....the rest is a muddled and roundabout way of asking for empirical evidence.

You then go on to ignore the post, and sidestep answering the questions asked of you......Perhaps my "Presumptions" were accurately based on observation.

 

Really? I walked across the bed of the Red Sea. The only difficulties were the weights and the 300' long snorkel.

 

You are still wrong. You said I would "ignore" his "post" followed by asking a question. I did not ignore his post, therefore you are wrong.

 

Golly....don't I look the fool.

 

You goose... you would have had the bends.

 

Nope. He would have found that he could not expand his lungs against the water pressure.

 

I don't believe anyone "looks the fool". People might do what is called 'foolish' things, but even in that the term 'foolish' is subjective. No one, IMHO, is insignificant or lacking in some worth.

 

For clarity could you say if you believe in a world wide flood and the 6 day poof?

 

Everywhere.

 

That is a little ambiguous. Could you please be a little more specific and provide explanation of why you believe that to be factual?

 

Your question requires more information on the variables. Such as what are you defining as a world wide flood? What are you using as a standard of measurement for the size of mountains? What are you using as a criteria for the time of such an event? Then there is the matter of the "6 day poof".. Please define a '6 day poof' and describe in detail the ingredients used in this '6 day poof'.

Indirect answer to your question: Yes! I could say that.

 

honestly, people in america!

 

Wine into water? Though it would be a waste.