[video=youtube;G6gtqAr241I]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6gtqAr241I[/video] I think this is well covered and within reason not disputable. Does anyone have a factual dispute?
I've been saying all along, there were NO hijackers & for a multitude of reasons that it simply could not have been as the official account tells it.
His very first falsehood: #10 The hijackers names do not appear on any passenger manifest. This is patently false. The names were listed on the manifests. Premise of the thread has now been proven false. Try again.
The original news releases of the passenger lists, did not include the hijackers names and the later correction to that included the lame excuse that it was out of compassion for the victims families that they didn't list the obviously middle-eastern sounding names.
Source this claim. What you are saying here is a falsehood started by 'truthers'. It has no basis in fact.
So based on your dismissal of one point in the presentation, you dismiss the whole thing... (?) or? what?
I was discussing the points one at a time. Do you agree that the first point (#10 since they are counting backward) was false? If so, we can move on to the next.
Given that the lame excuse for the list discrepancy is the difference between "victim list" & passenger list.... oh my! I am not going to give it the benefit of calling that one a journalistic mistake. there are bits that are pivotal to the argument such as the physical evidence that the airliners were actually crashed at the locations alleged by the mainstream media. this is the sort of thing that should be discussed in reference to proving the whole hijacker fiasco to be total fraud.
The OP's first point is James Fetzer saying that the hijacker were listed on none of the flight manifestos. This has been proven a lie. Will you agree then that the first point raised in the video is incorrect? If so, we can move on to point number two. Scientifically, rationally.
Since it is debatable about the "lie" vs "journalistic error" in the reporting of the flight manifests or victim lists or whatever, its a non-point here. Therefore let us simply consider this one unresolved.
Stop hedging.....it was FALSE,the airlines used the manifest to connect names to seat numbers provided by flight attendants
on the subject of wreckage, the argument has been raised that since everybody already knew exactly what happened, there was no need to examine the aircraft wreckage to note how much of it was recovered, however to then present the fact of there having been "wreckage" without any real data as to exactly how much of it there was, is completely BOGUS! because without a certified inventory of aircraft bits, it is a moot point as to the actual event that is did an airliner actually crash in the location where alleged?
The facts are that there isn't any physical proof that the alleged hijacked airliners existed at all, and that WTC1, 2 & 7 were destroyed by controlled demolition. The whole mainstream propaganda machine story is a CROCK!
Where is it documented that either "FLT11" "FLT175" "FLT77" or "FLT93" was actually accounted for in the recovered physical evidence?
So... thousands of people all imagined things at the exact same time, while cameras caught it all on film? Good lord. You can't have a rational conversation with somebody that attempts to blatantly re-write history to align with their agenda.