210 Democrats Voted Against Providing Immediate Medical Assistance to Babies Who Survive Abortion

The one they got Gosnell under

 

You are if you are suggesting resuscitation on pre viable foetuses

 

If anyone is near DC tomorrow

 

Good! Now what are they doing for the born babies? America has an infant mortality rate that would make a third world country blush


https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/infantmortality.htm

 

It is not the basics of born, it is the civil liability where the person can sue the doctor "if they believe" it was an abortion or attempted abortion." it is not only the mother but anyone who can act on behalf of the mother. Hence why C Sections would be now legally risky because of the bill if the baby does not survive the C Section procedure.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
So you don't know what " foetal abnormality incompatible with life." means but yet you keep discussing it....how odd...






LOL, you sure like to start fights ...no, what I said was ( and NOTE: YOU COULD NOT ADDRESS IT)

""""So you don't know what " foetal abnormality incompatible with life." means but yet you keep discussing it....how odd..."""

Ya, I know you never have proof of what you alege...
Your desire to try to "win" by suggesting ignorance may make you feel better, but you really didn't prove anything.[/QUOTE]


It proves you don't know what "foetal abnormality" means

Uh, you can't have a point on foetal abnormality IF you don't know what it means !!! LOLOL

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
LOL, well , ya don't have to wait 1,000 years since abortion has been around a whole lot longer than that...and deformed babies have been allowed to die just as long...

Oh my! You got all of that out of """"LOL, well , ya don't have to wait 1,000 years since abortion has been around a whole lot longer than that...and deformed babies have been allowed to die just as long..."""


but I guess if you have NOTHING YOU have to make up something even if it's not there....it's a desperation move

 

If there wasn't several instances of malpractice and failure to provide life saving support proof, I might agree with you.

It happens.

 

Too much of a grey line.

Is allowing the baby to expire on the abortion table murder?

 

He was mutilating the babies. Chomping them up, which was obviously murder.

How many were left to simply expire in a bio-hazard bag?

 

Where is the data that you base this theory a redundant law would have an impact?

 

Based on what data is this occuring?

 

Please learn how to use the quote function. I am tired of fixing your posts every time I respond because you can't seem to figure out a seemingly easy function on the forum.

I know what it means, it is simply a whataboutism to avoid my point.

 

In typical FoxHastings fashion, every one of your responses is now about ME, and nothing to do with defending your position in the face of facts.

It's because your arguments are weak, and they don't stand on their own. This transition is normal when your defense is driven by an agenda rather than facts and logic.

Go play with somebody else Fox. I am all full of crazy today and don't need anymore.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
It proves you don't know what "foetal abnormality" means




Uh, you can't have a point on foetal abnormality IF you don't know what it means !!! LOLOL

LOL, you are right on schedule....we've been going back and forth for awhile and NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN for some Not-So-Mysterious reason you are having trouble responding !

It's simply a ploy to avoid answering those "inconvenient" posts

 

Uh, you didn't HAVE to reply...

FoxHastings said: ↑
Oh my! You got all of that out of """"LOL, well , ya don't have to wait 1,000 years since abortion has been around a whole lot longer than that...and deformed babies have been allowed to die just as long..."""


but I guess if you have NOTHING YOU have to make up something even if it's not there....it's a desperation move

 

That isn't a justification for having multiple laws that say the same thing.

What we're seeing is a faction in congress using their position for grandstanding with the hope of partisan political gain.

 

You just aren't presenting any information that would form a basis for prosecution.

There are already laws dealing with late term pregnancies and viable fetuses.

For example, abortion of a viable fetus is illegal - there would have to be some sort of extreme medical emergency for that to happen.

Your reference to an "abortion table" and a live birth tells the whole story about your lack of understanding of this issue.

I think you also have to remember that there are live births where the baby is not going to live. Prolonging the "life" of a newborn in agony and with no hope does not justify extreme medical measures to lengthen that period.

 

Over what time period and where?

 

Yes and he was operating outside the law. Make abortion illegal and you will have many many more Kermit Gosnells none of whom will be bothered about some stunt law passed by Republicans dog whistling

The only hope you have is to ensure abortion remains legal and monitored I.e. it is treated like any other medical procedure

 

Are you suggesting that each time you find a crime being committed we need to have the legislature make ANOTHER law against that same crime???

I just need a better understanding of what you think a rational congressional direction might look like.

 

Uh, ya....people break laws....do ya make a new law every time someone breaks a law ....or is that only what Repubs want to do to Grow Government Bigger ??

 

What posts?

The whataboutism you had about viability, as if that applied to every case?

Your last 4 posts have said nothing about the topic, and only about me. Am I to assume you have no more points?

 

We're done.

 

Haven't you said that before ?

I think you were done a while back