Gun safe company hit with backlash for providing FBI with code to customer's safe

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Wild Bill Kelsoe, Sep 9, 2023.

  1. fmw

    fmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2009
    Messages:
    38,764
    Likes Received:
    14,906
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It isn't all that difficult to break into a gun safe. An abrasive wheel applied to the side of safe can get the job done in a few minutes. If they had valid court order then it is just a matter of asking the invetigatee to choose between unlocking the safe or standing clear of the sparks. I have a gun safe. The door is substantial. The rest of it is mild sheet steel.
     
    Wild Bill Kelsoe likes this.
  2. modernpaladin

    modernpaladin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    28,044
    Likes Received:
    21,334
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If the feds demanded you to open up your email for them because they had a search warrant for my house, would you comply?
     
    Wild Bill Kelsoe likes this.
  3. fmw

    fmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2009
    Messages:
    38,764
    Likes Received:
    14,906
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure, I doubt they would have time to dig through all the spam. I get about 500 spam emails per day. I sure don't have time to read them.
     
    Turtledude likes this.
  4. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,925
    Likes Received:
    21,121
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Here is the issue-the FBI warrant allowed them to search the premises. Maybe even force open the safe. The warrant did not apply to the safe company and did not give the FBI the power to make the safe company provide the codes.
     
  5. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Liberty Safe was not served with a warrant or subpoena.
    The owner of the safe was.
    Liberty is under no legal requirement to comply with that warrant.
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2023
    Turtledude likes this.
  6. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A warrant served in the owner of the safe.
    You are under no legal obligation to comply with a warrant served on someone else.
     
    Turtledude likes this.
  7. independentthinker

    independentthinker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2015
    Messages:
    8,342
    Likes Received:
    4,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    But there is no deep state.
     
    Wild Bill Kelsoe likes this.
  8. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,231
    Likes Received:
    63,416
    Trophy Points:
    113
    why would they protect someone that did what happened on jan 6th?

    Republicans are like.... snitches get stitches

    what I would take from this, is never buy a safe with a combination you can't change
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2023
  9. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,213
    Likes Received:
    33,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That doesn’t make any sense. Now if I had a package addressed to you and they had a warrant for the contents of said package — I would 100% give it to them.
     
  10. Wild Bill Kelsoe

    Wild Bill Kelsoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    22,902
    Likes Received:
    15,421
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They would have to have a warrant for your home, to search for the suspect package.

    They can't swear out a warrant for a single object, then search any property they want, looking for it.
     
    popscott likes this.
  11. Wild Bill Kelsoe

    Wild Bill Kelsoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    22,902
    Likes Received:
    15,421
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because he has rights...lol.
     
    popscott likes this.
  12. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,213
    Likes Received:
    33,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The poster asked what I would do.
    I responded with what I would do.
     
  13. Wild Bill Kelsoe

    Wild Bill Kelsoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    22,902
    Likes Received:
    15,421
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You would let the government break the law?

    Wait! Of course you would...lol
     
    Turtledude likes this.
  14. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,231
    Likes Received:
    63,416
    Trophy Points:
    113
    he does not have a right to control what the Gun safe company does with their information
     
  15. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,925
    Likes Received:
    21,121
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    let's examine that argument

    You buy safe. there is an implied contract that would be violated if the safe company broadcast publicly what the combination is.
     
  16. Joe knows

    Joe knows Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2021
    Messages:
    13,740
    Likes Received:
    10,102
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I 100% agree with giving the code when a search warrant is provided
     
  17. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,925
    Likes Received:
    21,121
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    on who?
     
  18. Wild Bill Kelsoe

    Wild Bill Kelsoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    22,902
    Likes Received:
    15,421
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Even if the company wasn't required to, by law?
     
  19. Wild Bill Kelsoe

    Wild Bill Kelsoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    22,902
    Likes Received:
    15,421
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He has a right to privacy and the safe company had an obligation to protect that right.
     
    Turtledude likes this.
  20. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,925
    Likes Received:
    21,121
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    it's an implied contractual duty
     
    Wild Bill Kelsoe likes this.
  21. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,231
    Likes Received:
    63,416
    Trophy Points:
    113
    sure, had he not stormed the Capital he would have, but the State got a warrant for the safe, it was now in possession of the State
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2023
  22. Joe knows

    Joe knows Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2021
    Messages:
    13,740
    Likes Received:
    10,102
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If there is warrant I totally agree. I will say it again if needed. I believe in due process and if they have a warrant I’m 100% okay with it. It’s not an infringement because at that point they had legal right to the search. I’m a staunch gun supporter because I believe in the constitution and if they went the constitutional path to search then yes I’m okay with it all day long.

    plus being there was a warrant I say give them the code just to save the safe.
     
    Last edited: Sep 12, 2023
  23. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,817
    Likes Received:
    18,296
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Just so you know, liberty safe doesn't manufacture the locking mechanism That is another company and liberty just installs them. digital locks also have a master code that you can have deleted. also you can call the company and have them removed.

    I think this really underscores the lack of privacy. companies have way too much access to way too much of our information. there needs to be legislation protecting privacy.
     
  24. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,817
    Likes Received:
    18,296
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Agreed but their compliance to sell out their customers should cost them.
    they first need to determine if the home owner had access to the safe before they can open it. if it is not his safe the contents are out of bounds. this is a fourth amendment issue. if they do determine he had access to it then they can cut it open. liberty told all of their customers they will voluntarily **** them in the ass if the FBI asks real nice. This should be a mortal wound to their business. it is called a safe.
    I will never understand why people want to brown nose the most incompetent of police.
     
  25. truth and justice

    truth and justice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2011
    Messages:
    25,930
    Likes Received:
    8,877
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If I had a room with a locked door and the police had a warrant to search my house, can I deny them access to that locked room?
     

Share This Page