1 dead and multiple injured in shooting following Chiefs Super Bowl parade

I bet Fentanyl killed over a hundred people on the very day and over a hundred more EVERY DAY since that shooting.. In fact I bet you Fentanyl kill over a hundred American ever day..

Where's all the outrage there? Clearly it's NEVER about death right? It's all about the guns

 

Ya, is it the gun, the deaths and are you really concerned with death at all?

 

You are “guessing”

 

I absolutely am diagnosing the issue. Your refusal to see that is not my fault.

 

Yes, that's my guess. What's your guess, another tranny gone wild?

 

The good guys with guns were probably not permitted to be there with their firearms because of laws designed to promote shootings. Also people like you can talk about how we need laws against guns to make more of this happen.

Have you ever stopped and wondered why 95% of mass shootings happen where you're not allowed to have a gun?

The problem isn't gun ownership the problem causing this is gun control.

You know where we never hear of mass shootings? Gun ranges gun clubs gun shows gun stores in artifact of guns and not the absence of them that would be where most of them would happen but it isn't.

I think people purposefully let this sort of thing happen but not fortifying schools or sporting events so that they can tell you how you need the government to protect you from the problem the government caused.

I think you should quit doing the bidding of the problem. I know you think those gun owners disagree with you on politics and they might, but that's no reason to simp for authoritarianism.

 

You didn't say it was okay....but you were offering it as an okay excuse, yes?

 

Thanks Steve - living up to expectations I see

 

No they can't wait. That's why they keep making gun free zones and shooting galleries and doing absolutely nothing to fortify them whatsoever that's so people can get shot and they can say it's not because of them but because of these people that had nothing to do with it owning guns.

If they want this to happen so that they can try and convince enough people to give up their rights they've done it before they got caught red-handed. Do you remember fast and furious? Eric Holder and the FBI when they got a call for background check they approved it knowing that the person wouldn't pass the background check and this was so that more people get murdered and they make sure not to do anything with the police in fact order them to stand down if you can also more people get killed and they can say it's because you own guns.

I don't know how many more people have to die before they give up on this stupid quest you know how the government is they don't like to accept when they're wrong.

 

where have women been imprisoned for that?

 

Aussies don't want rash actions of throwing away their rights to be pointed out as fool hearty as they were.

Instead of being angry at their government before ****ing them over they tried to get other places to vote for the same kind of ****ing over so that they're not the only ones.

 

Envy makes for an ugly soul

 

I was offering it as a possibility.

 

you probably understand my posts that constantly refer to Aesop's fox: the critter lost his beautiful tail and tries to convince other foxes to chop off their appendage. The moral of that fable is that misery craves company and it seems to be that many who are treated like subjects and children by their governmental masters, want us to be in the same boat.

 

And our mass shooting rate is what percentage below yours?

 

And those countries with rational gun laws - what is their firearm mortality rate per year?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate

 

An 'okay' excuse, yes?

Because it might be 'gang,' we can all just forget about guns and go to sleep relaxed that our kids are safe to go to parades after a Super Bowl..

Yes??

 

And I wonder how many here will take any notice whatsoever of that?

 

They didn’t read their own link…I’m shocked.

 

It would not matter how 'angry' we might have been or not been.

Fact is....the guns are "gone," and no-one has suffered as a result of there being gone.

 

It isn't their laws that are causing that.

 

you cannot measure freedom based on the crimes committed by people who would commit those crimes no matter what the laws are. You seem to think that we can undo 300 years of freedom vs a country that was started as a penal colony and has never really trusted individuals to be free. The fact that so many foreigners who cannot freely own firearms, complain about our freedom is not a sign that they want to impose their "safety" upon us

 

that's as silly as if I said if abortion is banned, I don't suffer at all. just think of all the rights the left cherishes that could be eliminated if the people who don't support abortion, homosexual relationships etc were to say no one suffers when rights that group doesn't care for are abolished. Do you pretend to speak for every australian who had to (assuming they complied with those silly laws) give up their firearms were happy to do so?

 

are rational gun laws ones that harass honest people or disarm criminals? Do you consider say North Korea having "rational gun laws" how about stalinist Russia or Maoist China or Nazi Germany?

 

100% agreed